Pros And Cons Of Let It Burn

212 Words1 Pages
The lecture discusses that the 'Let it burn' policy was not destructive but creative which refutes the main idea in the reading that this policy was harmful. Firstly, the professor thinks that scorched areas were covered by nu plants. Actually, the diversity of plants enhanced because the fire gave a chance for some kinds of plants which could not grow in the park in the past to grow. Therefore, the tremendous damage to the vegetation cannot be the reason that the policy was harmful. Secondly, the professor contends that fire also created new opportunities for some new animals to live. New types of plants attracted new types of animals such as rabbits. The animals' predators would also come to the park. This strengthened certain and stronger