More handpicked essays just for you.
Persuasive arguments for lowering the voting age
Pros and cons of raising voting age to 21
The Importance Of Voting In Elections
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Persuasive arguments for lowering the voting age
Letting a new age group vote will help show the diversity that is among them. In the article Shin writes about how “some opponents said that young people barely old enough to drive a car don’t have enough perspective to vote.” This argument is valid because it is true that many young voters don’t have the experience to vote. It can still be undone by the fact that only informed individuals are willing to vote at such a young age. This is done through the fact that many young voters were prompted by this new right, to go out and seek the information needed to be well informed
Nowadays, the young generations are not aware of how important it is to go out to a poll and vote. Without the votes, voter turnout will continue to decline. The citizens should be more aware of what is going on, fight for their beliefs and issues, and make a
Drinking Age The drinking age should be eighteen instead of twenty-one. When you are eighteen years old, you are legally considered an adult. If you are considered an adult then you should be allowed to drink alcoholic products. Age does not define maturity and the eighteen to twenty year old age group should not have prejudice against them that makes them feel categorized into a particular group.
16 to 17 year olds know less informed decisions than voters in their 20’s. Frontal lobes of adolescents may not be fully developed, their judgement may not be as mature as it will be when they are older. I think an amendment should be able added to the constitution that would change the minimum voting age from 18 to 16. 15 to 17 year olds performed better than 24 to 25 year olds on a variety of political questions. Thirty seven percent of 15 to 17 year olds got the question correct, while twenty eight percent of 24 to 25 year olds got it
Every 15 minutes a teenager will die due to drunk driving. In the world, on average, 96 teens will die every day. The number of deaths would increase if the drinking age was lowered. The drinking age should not be changed. The age should stay the same.
Now they teach politics in schools so that the students can understand how politics work. We may never know, those younger votes can make a difference in society. Younger children deserve to vote too. They understand politics because they teach in their schools now. They age to vote should be sixteen and above.
I dont think lowering the voting age would benifit the govornmen or posotivly effect the voting percentage. Most likely i think it would discourage the older population from voting. Older people dont tend to think highly of the younger generations opinions. The two arguments I have seen focuse alot on the turnouts of the voting population and not on the mind of the younger voting population.
These are heavy obligations with their own challenges that adults have no problem taking on, so why shouldn’t the younger citizens that are undertaking these responsibilities be able to vote? If they are thought to be responsible enough
When the voting age stays the same while the legal age goes up, it gives the soon to be adult some gradual freedom. Not only that, but it helps him or her learn some politics first hand, while letting their voice be heard. It gives them a first taste of adulthood. “Like all lines that divide legal childhood from adulthood, the voting age is essentially arbitrary. Indeed, in modern America 18-year-old voting has become unmoored from one of its more important original justifications, which was matching the minimum age for draft eligibility (itself also an arbitrary line).”
Today, I read intertesting articles on different views on as to why the voting age should stay 18 years old and also why it shouldn't. I found some very valuable perspectives from each opposite arguement. After analyzing both opinions I have came to a conclusion of what I believe is best from my point of view. The conclusion I have came to is that the voting age should not be lowered. I have this opinion due to multiple reasons that were I pulled from the text.
Many have argued about whether or not the voting age of 18 should be maintained or lowered. To be fair, some of the people opposing to the change in the voting age are concerned about how mature and interested a 16 year old can be to take such a responsibility like voting and thats understandable. However, in my opinion lowering the voting age to 16 wouldn't cause a drastic change in the amount of people not voting. If anything it can actually help bring up the percentage of younger individuals who vote when having the influence to do so. Allowing voters in the age group of 16-18 a right to vote will cause a positive influence in young voters.
Lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 the pros and cons. Some would agrue that lowering the voting age would increase participation of young voters some say it would have no real effect. The national voteing age is a debate that has mainy devided, mainy say it only distracts from more serious issues while highlighting the "lack of civic responsibilty'' among today's young people. We should explore other solutions in order to fix the voters turnout rate in our country like voting booths or allowing people to vote from home, research shows that "america ranks at the bottom of the developed nations in turnouts"not just based on our national voting age but because we fail to explore other solutions.
We need votes from people that understand everything about the election. There is no contest in voting ranks with other countries. I feel there is no trust in letting 16 year olds vote when they have no interest or knowledge to make a smart
If some citizens who are qualified to vote are denied the right to cast votes, it is considered as a severe abuse of political equality. The debate about the age of electoral majority has taken place for a long period; however, there has been moderately slight attention in the debate given to the exclusion of young people from the vote (Tremmel, 2015). Some of the critics of lowering the voting age to sixteen claim that the young people do not possess the capability and motivation of appropriately taking part in the elections. Some studies have shown that the turnout of the voters ages 18 years is relatively low, however, this cannot specifically attribute to the motivation to take part in the election (Wagner, Johann, & Kritzinger, 2012). This shows that this the issue of the age to the electoral majority is of significance and should be discussed.
Yet, to avoid this, we can teach them how not to be swayed at school. According to the Electoral Reform Society, they support young citizens at the age of 16 in how to vote and what decision making they should do. If teenagers get the support from authorized adults who can lead young adults to the right path through society, I believe we can trust their opinions. The Fulcrum exclaims that the Ontario Government already recognizes that 16 year olds can understand the issues and independent judges on them. From this, we can say that adults keep full eye on young adults and what kind of thinking they have towards politics so it is safe for teenagers to start voting.
