ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

1104 Words5 Pages

Nuclear weapons, do they provide peace or war? Well first off lets talk about them. October 1939, after the outbreak of World War II in Europe, the president of the United States of America, Franklin D. Roosevelt received a letter from a physicist named Albert Einstein and his colleague, Leo Szilard telling news of a bomb with unprecendented power that could be made by tapping the forces of nuclear fission. They also feared that Hitler of Germany was already working on the problem and solution. If the Germans were to be the first to develop such a devastating weapon Hitler would have access to a weapon that could destroy his enemies and rule the world. To avoid such a nightmare, Einstein and Szilard urged the goverment to join the race for nuclear weapons. Roosevelt agreed, for the next four and half years a vast top secret effort was launched in cooperation with the United Kingdom, code-named "the manhattan project" the effort eventually employed 200,000 …show more content…

The potential threat of the Nazi nuclear weapons no longer existed. But the War in the Pacific was still raging with fire, the President of the United States, Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb in order to force the Japanese leadership to surrender as quickly as possible. August 6, an atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima instantly killing 70,000 people, with another 70,000 deaths registered by the end of 1945, the bomb had an explosive force of 12.5 kilotons of TNT... August 9, a second bomb was dropped on Nagaski. This explosion produced a higher yield of 22 kilotons of TNT but caused fewer instant deaths, however many of the survivors suffered from heavy burns, radiation sickness, etc..., and the deaths continued to rise. By the end of the year more then 70,000 Nagaski's citizens lost their lives. Five years later, as many as 340,000 people, or 54 percent of the original population, had been wiped out from the two

Show More
Related
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

In 1945, Japan was losing World War Two, but was split between surrendering or fighting till the end. As they chose to fight instead of surrender, that is when Harry Truman was notified about the successful test of the “most terrible bomb in history”. Multiple hours were spent doing research, and billions of dollars were used for its production. Since an atomic bomb is serious the heat released in a nuclear explosion creates a sphere of burning gas that can range from hundreds of feet. Since Harry Truman was president at the time it was his decision whether or not he was going to use the bomb to end the war.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Envision having to make a decision that could end 220,000 lives. President Truman had to make a decision of this magnitude. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. When Japan did not surrender, the United States dropped another atomic bomb three days later. President Truman made this decision because he believed it would end World War II, which it did.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

ATOMIC BOMB: HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI The end of world war II brought the extensive discussion to the world. On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped by an American B29 bomber over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later a second B-29 dropped the second atomic bomb over Nagasaki. On August 15, Japan's emperor announced Japan's unconditional surrender, which led to the end of the war. After several years, doubt about the use of these atomic bombs has appeared, and the debate about if the dropping of the atomic bomb was the right and necessary decision.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6,1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki were attacked by atomic bombs that were dropped by the U.S Military. Over 200,000 people were killed. The United States used the bomb to end the war with Japan, which began in 1941 when Japan launched an unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. Many people believe that dropping the atomic bombs was the right thing to do because if they did not use it, there would be four more years of fighting and hundreds of thousands more US soldiers would have died because the Japanese refused to surrender.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

President Truman was right to use the atomic bomb on Japan because it ended World War II in the pacific, saved more lives in the long run, and strategically, caused destruction to Japan that was enough to draw the Japanese to surrender. To begin, the atomic bomb was seen as a way to shock the Japanese into surrender, according to the short film about the bombing on Hiroshima shown in class. Prior to the large atomic bombing in Hiroshima, there were

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

To make a great protagonist that flows well with other characters, authors tend to use themes of great leadership in their stories. Homer’s, The Odyssey, is an epic poem about the journey home of Odysseus, the king of Ithaca, after the Trojan War. Along the way, he faces many challenges, including the wrath of the sea-god Poseidon. In the story, Odysseus shows examples of leadership through instances of human flaw and great warriorship throughout the epic poem.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

World War II was the bloodiest war in world history that led to reorientation of both economic and social axiomatic patterns such as new conserving methods and contributing to the war effort. The violence between the United States and Japan, beginning with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, led to hundreds of thousands of casualties for both countries. To ensure a rapid victory for the United States, atomic bombs were dropped at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These nuclear bombs were authorized, to be used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, by President Harry Truman. The decision to deploy atomic bombs in Japan was the wrong decision, due to the dwindling Japanese military power already leading to a surrender, the massive amounts of destruction brought upon Japan

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

During the time President Truman authorized the use of the most devastating weapon ever used against Japan in World War II, the United States was making preparations to seize the Japanese motherland. The defenses that the Japanese military were preparing had shown American strategists that there was still some fight left in a supposedly doomed enemy. High-ranking members of the military and civilians brought forth President Truman a variety of choices on how to force Japan to surrender. These choices included invading Japan, negotiating a peace settlement, bombing Japan through aerial warfare, and compressing the naval blockade. The atomic bomb would become an alternative once the bomb itself became operational.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

If you were president Truman, would you drop the bomb? The Manhattan project had been in the works for 3 years, and finally, on August 6th and 9th, 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. History on the net provides many reasons as to why the atomic bomb was the best option possible. While some people believe the bomb was unnecessary and there was no need for it to have been dropped, others believed that it had to have been dropped as it saved lives. The US should have dropped the bomb, because it was dropped after careful consideration from experienced military officials, it shortened the war, and the Japanese committed many atrocities and war crimes.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

JFK once said, " Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind." In 1939 Albert Einstein had written the US president of the potential to build a nuclear weapon. The US entrance into the war on December 7th of 1941 led to the president creating the Manhattan Project in 1942 where the atomic bomb was developed. On August 6th of 1945 US president Truman ordered the bombing of Hiroshima using the atomic bomb, 3 days later he ordered a second bomb to be dropped in Nagasaki. The US was justified in using the atomic bomb to end WWII because, America's technology was their greatest achievement, during the time of war death is inevitable, and Japan ignored all warnings given by America.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Adolf Hitler used censorship to control how the Jewish people were perceived. Along with spreading propaganda, Nazis also burned books (Lewy). Markus Zusak’s novel The Book Thief explores the idea of censorship and the power of words during Nazi Germany. The censored material the protagonist Liesel Meminger read is perhaps one of the books that influenced her the most.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

On the morning of April 6th, 1945, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, America dropped a bomb developed to destroy homes on Hiroshima, Japan. Instantly, 18,000 people were killed, and around 400,000 more died from radiation effects afterward. Nine days later, on April 15th, Japan surrendered and the war between Japan and America ended. With many American people questioning if the bomb was needed to end the war, America released an article stating that the bomb was a necessary evil. But, many still wonder whether or not America should have dropped the atomic bomb.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Seventy-two years after we dropped the first one, the atomic bomb and the choice to drop two of them on Japan is still debated today. Was it a just decision? Could it have been avoided? Was the decision rushed? Was the dropping of the bombs necessary?

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

As all the world has known, the biggest atomic bomb in warfare history by the end of World War 2 is the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima that hit on August 9th, 1945 by the direct order of our 33rd president of The United States Of America; Harry S. Truman. He thought this bomb would bring a close ending of the war (World War 2) and it definitely did but it was too much to handle afterwards when it hit. There was no choice for Truman because there was no other way to bring the war into a close. It was the last call, but they didn’t realize that after they released the bomb, it was hard to decide whether it was a mistake or the right decision. The bomb killed innocent people of 199,000 (plus more).

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

Related Topics

Open Document