ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes Get Paid

846 Words4 Pages

Jonah Sievert
Ms. Adelmann
World Lit & Comp
November 7th 2017
Should College Athletes Get Paid?
In the mid 1900s there was a Midwestern university that paid a town blacksmith, lawyer, and four railroad employees to play football. Because of this, the NCAA had to adopt a ‘Sanity Code’ which limits college players to only receive scholarships as a source of payment. This incident has caused an abuse of the system which obviously didn’t work, so why are asking the same questions? Why are we asking to pay college athletes?The payment of college athletes for their contributions on the field wouldn’t be beneficial because it would lead to colleges becoming less economically affordable not only for the college, but for the students as well.
College student-athletes shouldn’t get paid for their contributions on the field because academic institutions will then have to …show more content…

College athletes should get paid because even with scholarships, the cost of their basic needs outweighs the amount of money they have to pay. According to Krikor Meshefejian the author of the article “Pay to Play”, he states the some student-athletes have to leave school early because they don’t have enough money to continue their education, but by giving them a little extra money, they would remain in school and complete their education. Paying the athletes could benefit the institutions and students by giving them an education. According to a study done in 2015, “College graduates earn approximately 84% money than high school graduates” (Hsu 3). By paying college student-athletes just enough money to cover their basic needs, they are given the chance to earn almost double the amount of money of a high school graduate, which would help the school as well as the economy. Even though full scholarships don’t pay for everything, the athletes can still get loans which would cover the cost of their other

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

College Athletes Being Paid: An Annotated Bibliography Bouchrika, Imed. “Why Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Research. Com, 21 Apr. 2023, research.com/education/why-should-college-athletes-be-paid.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Athletes who receive a full scholarship do not have to worry about paying off student loans because they do not have

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

The reasons college athletes should be paid is because although they have their scholarship; it typically does not pay for everything. Secondly other people make money off of the college athletes. And lastly college athletes do not have the time to get a decent job, or even a job at all. The NCAA does not allow athletes to be paid which

Read More
2997 Words | 12 Pages

Building on the financial disparities, another significant issue with paying athletes is because it takes away from the main priority of college. Paying college athletes undermines the primary purpose of higher education: academics. Colleges are institutions of learning first, and sports should come as a complement to this educational mission. An article that supports this is “Should College Athletes Be Paid,” which was published under Junior Scholastic, where they state: College sports provide hundreds of thousands of student athletes the opportunity to play the sports they love while getting the education and skills they need to succeed after college.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

The argument about college athletes, to pay or to not pay, has been an ongoing debate for a long period of time. The NCAA, or National College Athletics Association, was founded by President Roosevelt in 1905, with the idea of paying salaries to the athletes who were a part of this organization in mind (Top 10). But, since 1905 the NCAA has made millions and millions of dollars off of their athletes, as well as other things such as TV marketing and advertising, but still continue not to pay them because it's “against their tradition”. It may be against the long running tradition of the NCAA, but something needs to change.

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

Tommy Wolf Ms. Rebekah Barton ENG 101 11 June 2018 Should College Athletes Be Paid Throughout my college years, I have seen many athletes that come from the high school level to college where the get paid to play. These certain people are getting an easier pathway to get to college for their sport. Not everyone gets the opportunity as the athletes do. The image of this is that the students are getting college free as in scholarships. Everything like their dorms and tuition are paid for.

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Many wonder if college athletes should be paid. The people who say no just do not realize the struggle a student athlete goes through. The athletes should be paid because being an athlete is a job (Edelman, “21 reasons why student-athletes are employees). Plus, the ncaa makes billions every year (Edelman, “Why the NCAA's 'No Pay' Rules Violate Section One of the Sherman Act”). Also, students have to often miss some classes for away games and tournaments (Martin, “Should college athletes be paid for performance?).

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Jared Welch and Blake Marshall said ‘’The athletes also bring in a lot of money and proponents tend to view the money as an excess, something that isn’t already planned’’. college players should get paid to support their self. People think college athletes should be paid because they are entertainers they bring people out to watch them play football basketball and other sports and that brings money to the schools coaches,athletic directors administrators. ESPN and colleges sports tv channels earn millions off of college athletes that could have a good chance to make it pros or hall of fame and breaked records in the future.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

With all the hours they put into practicing, they could be putting it into studying for classes. Many athletes are in debt from having to pay for book debts and giving the athletes money would help to solve that issue. All the money the college athletes get could also be spent in a bad way. Some argue that college athletes should not be paid. One reason college athletes should not be paid is because they will be irresponsible with their money.

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

Paying College Athletes College athletes work year round preparing to participate in contests that entertain viewers and earn the NCAA and many universities money. Some believe that universities make financial gains at the expense of the athletes; however, many of these athletes at large universities playing the more popular sports like football and basketball are on full scholarship and receive countless free benefits. This has led to the question: Should college athletes be paid? For years, there have been many differing ideas and opinions on this controversial subject. The nature of the problem is that universities bring in millions of dollars in revenue related to athletics, yet the athletes who put in countless hours practicing their

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes shouldn’t be paid. Colleges athletes shouldn’t be paid because of various reasons. The athletes will be left with very little money. Plus,the main reason they are there is to learn and get a degree,the athletic side is just a bonus. Once they’re in college you should focus on the education side of things because they can’t play sports forever.

Read More
1921 Words | 8 Pages

There have been a few questions that has been asked for a long time regarding why certain things don’t happen, but the main one is rather student-athletes should be paid or not. I believe that student- athletes should be paid for what they do for the school. Even though the student-athletes are given scholarships for their skill, there are some who wound up giving the college more money than the money that is equal to their scholarship. People may think then why should you give money to the lesser athletes who don’t contribute as much to the prestige of the school, but if you just paid certain individual it would be the same as it is now. By that it means it would basically be the same as athletes getting paid by others to go to the school or just to have money to walk around with while in college.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

Although college athletes bring in money for the school they attend, they should not be compensated by being paid. Athletes are already compensated by receiving a four year athletic scholarships which ranges $70,000 to to $200,000 over a period of 4 years. This is a large amount of money for one person to be given on a scholarship. Also with the scholarship their books, tuition, room and board are covered. Athletes getting paid will affect the value of their education and it’ll create problems: sports program and student body.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes Get Paid

Related Topics

Open Document