More handpicked essays just for you.
Why college student athletes should be paid
Probelms for the debate on should or shouldnt student athletes be paid
Should college athletes be paid pros and cons essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
College Athletes Being Paid: An Annotated Bibliography Bouchrika, Imed. “Why Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Research. Com, 21 Apr. 2023, research.com/education/why-should-college-athletes-be-paid.
Here Are Some Pros and Cons” is an informational essay it is written at a point to where you see both sides of the pros and cons of each side, of should college athletes get paid. The author shows the sides what African Americans think and what White Americans think on the topic. He shows that African American Athletes are the majority of athletes in the NCAA at the top levels. In it, he shows that 52% of black responders are in favor and for white responders only 15%. Then for white Americans, only 27% support the idea of college athletes getting paid.
The author centers around the system of how wages would actually be worth less than that of scholarship benefits and that the increase in wage demand for athletes would put universities under financial pressure. He mentions those who support paying college athletes for their hard-earned work and those who do not when he states that “On the surface it seems ideal and fair to pay college athletes for the hours of labor they put in each week; however, it’s important to analyze the trickle down of effects such a drastic change would cause.” (Marcus) By addressing both sides of the argument, Marcus lets his readers know that he is aware of athletes deserving a salary, but remains in his stance against the topic. He refers to sports fans in particular who disregard and ignore the actual complications that would be caused if the NCAA were to pay college athletes.
Tommy Stone Professor Weisman English 102 2 February 2023 Summary of “Paying College Athletes” Should college athletes be paid for their efforts and hard work while playing sports? Yes, they should be even though their schooling is paid for doesn’t mean there bills their food or car payments are handled, and college life is expensive, especially if you don’t have a job. “The National Collegiate Athletic Association and its corporate partners make billions of dollars from college athletes. Those players should be compensated for their hard work, sacrifice, and dedication, and they should be free to profit from the licensing of their names and likenesses”.
In our world today the media has twisted and changed all news and this causes confusion among people researching a topic. Many readers are uneducated on a topic and when they read anything with knowing the credibility of a source, this begins a wildfire of misinformation. There has been a lot of debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid or are their scholarships enough College athletes should be paid due to the fact that they are making lots of money for their schools. The main point of the article is that there is a lot of controversy as to whether or not college athletes should be paid and it offered the pros and cons of paying these athletes. People that are familiar with college sports, because the article mentions names and deals that have occurred in college sports.regularly.
The world of collegiate sports is not immune to controversy happening on and off its courts or playing fields when it comes to life of the players and the organization. A reoccurring controversy that goes on almost every season in every sport is the act of paying college athletes for their participation. The NCAA rules strictly prevent college athletes from accepting any forms of compensation for performance while under amateurism regulations.
Kayleb Barentt Chaplin/Howell English II 5th 10 February 2023 Controversial Topic The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines controversy as, “a discussion marked especially by the expression of opposing views” (“controversy”). There are a plethora of controversies affecting Americans today. Not all students learn the same and school hasn't changed at all in a lot of years. People are debating this all the time.
Zeke Wilson Chaplin/Zinck English II 3rd 24 February 2023 Controversial Topics The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines controversy as, “a discussion marked especially by the expression of opposing views” (“Controversy”). There are many controversies that affect society today. Controversy can destroy families, cause arguments, and initiate political strife. Some of the major controversies affecting America today are racism, abortion, and gun control.
Both sides of the argument have strong compelling arguments. As a college student and former athlete I feel, college athletes should not get any monetary compensation other than education, and living. I shall concern myself with the economic side of paying athletes, moreover I will argue the privilege of playing college sports as well as how paying college athletes will ruin what college sports are. With the help of several resources I will be able to clearly define both sides of the argument and prove why my point of view makes the most sense. The sources I will use will give authority to my argument as well as prevent me from creating logical fallacies.
College is all about getting an education, and it should remain the most important thing when attending college. When an athlete attends it is often their goal to showcase their talents and take easy classes. Is it right to pay college athletes, if the public were to allow college athletes to be paid, then we could run into some problems. With paying college athletes, we have the possibility of running into the idea of paying all athletes including high school. College is where one should gain the education to succeed in life.
"[Student] Athletes are little more than indentured servants," according to Nancy Armour, USA Today sports columnist ("Paying"). Major issues get overlooked by Armour and others who support paying college athletes. The National College Athletic Association (NCAA) must push back against increasing pressure to pay student-athletes to preserve the principles of college sports, the college experience and uphold the teamwork of a school. In 1987, Southern Methodist University received the death penalty (Dobbs).
One of the most heated debates in the modern sports industry regards the issue of whether the work of collegiate athletes warrants monetary compensation. The classic position of sports academia has been that the athletes’ scholarships and received training were enough recompense, especially considering their “amateurism.” However, personages both in and out of the sports industry have started challenging this opinion. Those well-versed in the language of the law have brought these regulations up as potentially illegal. Economists have raised ethical concerns regarding the skewed distribution of the profits made from sports events.
Throughout the years, there have been constant debates as to whether college athletes should be paid. But since students are already being covered by their scholarships and the scholarships cover the student’s necessities such as medical needs and food, colleges fail to see that those young adults need a lot more than basic necessities such as clothing, hygiene materials, or even video games, new phones and much more. Student-athletes definitely deserve to get paid since they put all of their free time and all of their attempt to play for their school and receive somewhat of an education while colleges and the NCCA are rolling around in their money that those students earned but did not receive. Utmost people believe that the NCCA and colleges should be paying their sports players since “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million” ( Text 1 line 1-2).
If colleges were to pay athletes there would be no fair way to distribute the money. Athletes perform their sport at different levels and for various lengths of time. In addition, not every player is able to compete or participate in a competition or game. Problems would arise about the athlete not having any playing time which would not allow him/her to receive the money he/she deserves. The first issue about this problem is that some people believe that athletes should be paid based on an open market system.
Article Critique Paper Taylor Thissen Minnesota State University, Mankato After reading this peer reviewed journal article, I got a great understanding on what pay for play actually is. In this short article, the research that is being addressed is determining whether National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes should be getting paid to play their respected sport. It is clear that there is really no simple way in to clearing this problem up. It is a question that seems to arise twice a year. Every March when the NCAA’s March Madness arrives, and as well when the NCAA football season starts.
