ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

1648 Words7 Pages

Plea bargaining is the process by which the prosecution and defense reach an agreement resulting in a guilty plea from the defendant that results in a reduced charge, reduced sentence, or some other concession favorable to the defendant is the definition from chapter twelve “Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas” of the book Courts of Criminal Justice in America (Siegel). In criminal cases, this is an agreement to avoid the trial to be long; instead of taking the lawsuit to a jury, the prosecutor and the defendant work together to find something in which they can agree. It usually includes pleading for a smaller charge and pleading guilty in return for a lesser sentence. Most cases in the United States are settled through plea bargain rather than …show more content…

There are various arguments in support of plea bargaining; for example, it is beneficial because it helps the state and the court contribute with caseloads. This process allows the prosecutor’s work load decrease; this lets them prepare for more dangerous trials and leaving the easy charges to settle through. “A quickly reached plea bargaining may give victims the satisfaction of having the case closed quickly; in addition, victims may not want to testify or risk the possibility that the prosecution will not succeed in obtaining conviction(Seigel).” Because trial cases are congested to schedule, plea bargaining helps the scheduling process less jammed. The main advantage for someone accepting a plea bargaining is that a judge can ease the need to schedule and hold a trial on an agenda that may already be overloaded. The website, Connect Us, also states, “judges are also aware of overcrowding in jails, so they might be receptive to process out offenders who are unlikely to do much jail time anyway. This means cases will be closed much quicker, which is good for the society as the method de-clogs court systems for more serious cases.” Plea bargaining also rushes the course of cases. They are an important influence in rearranging offenders by allowing them to agree to the responsibility for their case. Also, it lets them willingly surrender before the law without having costly and inefficient cases. Defensive attorney is advantageous of plea bargaining. The book states, “public defenders face resources constraints like those of prosecutors, and plea-bargaining benefits them both by allowing quick disposition of cases and by allowing them to focus on cases that they perceive as being worthy of trial (Seigel).” The court also welfares from plea bargaining because this takes less time than a long trial. The process of plea bargaining

Show More
Related
588 Words | 3 Pages

Plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and defendant where the prosecutor offers the accused to plead guilty to a lesser sentence or to only one of several charges without going to court. What percentage of cases in Harris County are the result of a plea bargain?

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

For the defendant, the most significant benefit to plea bargaining is to take away the uncertainty of a criminal trial and to avoid the maximum sentence. Society also benefits from plea bargaining since the agreements lessen court congestion and free up prosecutors to handle more cases. The Cons of Plea

Read More
1804 Words | 8 Pages

In our country, the judicial system, being fair and powerful is still very slow. It has always been very crowded. Since the courts are over crowded, prosecutor’s case-loads are over loaded and defendants wants to save time and money, as the result of which an informal and easy way of pre-trail bargaining came into play. Its is known as Plea-Bargaining. Plea Bargaining is defined as the agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant, whereby the defendant agrees to his or her guilt of crime that has been committed in return for some concession from the prosecutor.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

When a person enters into a plea bargain agreement after coviented of a crime, that person who is being prosecuted have to make importants decisions. One of the most key decisions is how that person plead (Guilty or Not).“A plea is formal statement made on behalf of an accused person or made by the accused in court in response to the charge made against him” (Martin, 2003). Before a defendant plea Guilty or Not he/she have to enters into a plea bargains. A plea bargains are an agreement in a criminal case between the accuse person (defendant) and prosecutor usually involves the defendant pleading guilt in order to get reduced sentence, in stead of the case going before a jury. When a defendant accept a plea bargain he/she is giving up their Sixth Amendment to the United State Constituation.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

A “Plea bargain” is an agreement between the prosecutor, the defendant’s attorney and the defendant. In return for the defendant entering a plea of guilty to a criminal charge, the prosecutor agrees to recommend to the judge a particular penalty. Plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to obtain guilty pleas in cases that might otherwise go to trial. The prosecution is relieved of the burden of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt at trial and the defendant receives a specific resolution of the charges against him.

Read More
244 Words | 1 Pages

A plea bargain is an optional agreement that occurs during a criminal case between a prosecutor and defendant. These agreements are options for the defendant to take rather than taking their case to trial. Ninety-seven percent of all federal cases and ninety-four of all state cases are all settled by plea bargains() Plea bargaining has become a normal process when it comes to court cases. Although every individual has their own beliefs, plea bargaining helps out our criminal justice system but in contrast it is taking away from the value of the criminal justice system. Just like in every story we are faced with two different sides a positive and a negative.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

Read More
101 Words | 1 Pages

Plea bargaining should be allowed in the court system. This is because the plea bargains are quick which saves time in court. It also saves the expenses of the state. It is easier to just admit to the case to receive the lesser sentence. There also might be some added information that could lead to locating missing people, remains of a victim or kidnapping victims.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Plea bargaining has multiple impacts on the criminal justice system, positive and negative. In this paper I am going to be explaining to you why I think it has a positive impact and how it aids with the efficiency of the criminal justice system. There are a lot of ways plea bargaining affects the criminal justice system in positive ways such as allows the courts to go through cases a lot faster than if there was no plea bargaining. In 2004, for defendants 96% were convicted of felonies in federal courts.

Read More
146 Words | 1 Pages

A plethora of children in the United States is being tried as an adult consequently, 3000 children nationwide are sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Children under the age of eighteen should not be tried as an adult in the interest of the physical and mental well-being of the child. Many questions should be asked by the court before considering trying a child as an adult. What was the nature and nurture of the accused child? Was the child being abused?

Read More
73 Words | 1 Pages

The positive of the guilty plea is a controversial aspect of the criminal justice systems. He helps to solves the cases faster, speed up legal procedures, eliminate the number of cases in the court. Save time and money to the government. In addition, reduce the number of people in prisons. People who accepted plea bargaining, some of them get a probation, and can go home.

Read More
132 Words | 1 Pages

A District Attorney plea bargain, files a lawsuit against people.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

For those in prison, those who snitch saying the defendant confessed, testifying can be a bargaining chip; the state will often reduce sentence time or

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the courts are backlogged and many public defenders and judges being overworked, this causes plea bargaining to be used repeatedly. According to Walker et al. (2018), plea bargaining leaves many people no option but to plea guilty even when this is not their best option. This is due to a multitude of reasons but mainly to receive a lesser charge. For example, a felony and little time in jail may be better than risking multiple felonies and an excessive amount of time in jail.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Open Document