ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Procedural Justice System

1473 Words6 Pages

Procedural justice emphasizes the fairness of methods used to achieve outcomes (Thibaut & Walker, 1975). In interactions with authorities, the fairness of the process by which outcomes are achieved may be more important than the favorability of the outcomes themselves (Lind & Tyler, 1988). A relational model of authority (Tyler & Lind, 1992) attributes these effects of procedural justice to individuals' perceptions of fair treatment as an indication of their value and status in society. A substantial body of empirical research has supported many predictions based on a relational model of authority (Hinds & Murphy, 2007; Murphy, 2009; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003a; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003b; Tyler, 2001, 2005, 2006; Tyler & Huo, 2002; Tyler & Wakslak, 2004). For example, research suggests that public support for and satisfaction with the police are based more on how the police exercise their authority than whether the police are effective in controlling crime (Tyler, 2001). Higher perceived procedural justice in contacts with the police has been also linked to increased legitimacy (internally motivated obligation to obey the law), arguably a primary factor in shaping law-abiding behavior (Tyler & Darley, 2000).

Despite the impressive findings, …show more content…

They used the concept of procedural justice to describe the fairness of the process by which decisions are made by authorities as opposed to distributive justice which is the fairness of the decisions themselves. Since then an impressive body of research in social, legal, and organizational settings has demonstrated that people place a significant value on the fairness of the process by which outcomes are achieved (MacCoun, 2005). Two explanations have been offered for this phenomenon: an instrumental perspective and a noninstrumental

Open Document