ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

521 Words3 Pages

Currently, me and other Americans are undergoing a change in government. Because there are numerous major flaws in the Articles of Confederation, Congress thought it would be best to draft a new Constitution. Hopefully, the people behind the ratification of the new Constitution are making the right choice. Apparently Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay are helping out. They are calling James Madison the “Father of the Constitution.” 9 out of the 13 states are needed to approve the new document. Several states highly favored the Constitution and ratified it instantly. Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey were the first to jump on board. Georgia and Connecticut soon followed. There is controversy within Massachusetts, Maryland, …show more content…

Federalists favored an efficient government that could improve and protect their economic status. The Constitution promises a strong centralized government with a checks and balances system to even out …show more content…

Anti-Federalists are those who are against the ratification of the Constitution because, they fear having a strong national government that would overpower the states. They are mainly state’s rights advocates as they remain loyal to their state governments. Additionally, they are generally poorer than the Federalists. Anti-Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation was a good enough plan that did not need any modification. They believed the Constitution lacked the protection of basic political rights, and did not give any significant power to the states. Massachusetts and three other states strongly opposed the new Constitution. To convince these states, a compromise was created to assure the creation of amendments as soon as possible. Finally, the states agreed to the ratification of the Constitution. By this point, Congress had enough states to approve the document. However, they wanted all the states to ratify it because, they believed that without New York and Virginia, who had a big population, the Constitution wouldn’t survive too

Show More
Related
305 Words | 2 Pages

During the revolutionary war congress felt that it needed a document to unite the states and set forth the principles and laws of the nation. Benjamin Franklin wrote the first draft of the articles to congress although it was never formally considered. It wasn’t until the 4th version of a draft was presented by John Dickinson, which congress began to feel closer to what they were looking for. After being revised three times, the document was approved to be submitted to the states in November 1777. All but one state, Maryland, agreed to the articles.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

The constitution was a large process and is the “Supreme Law of the Land.” There was a separation of powers when the constitution was being created which resulted in the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of government. During this time there was a meeting called the constitutional convention, where twelve of the thirteen colonies showed up. Two plans were debated during this process of creating the constitution, the New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan. Also happening as the constitution was being created and affect the outcome was the Connecticut compromise, where the two house legislature was made, the senate and house of representatives.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

Many of the state conventions ratified the Constitution, but called for amendments specifically protecting individual rights from abridgement by the federal government. The debate raged for months. By June of 1788, 9 states had ratified the Constitution, ensuring it would go into effect for those 9 states. However, key states including Virginia and New York had not ratified. James Madison, the principal author of the Constitution, knew that grave doubts would be cast on the Constitution if those states (the home states of several of its chief architects, including Madison himself) did not adopt it.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Everyone who had any sense knew that the Articles of Confederation were weak and unsuccessful, and they knew that they had to fix it. So delegates from all of the states decided to meet in the Pennsylvania. However, Rhode Island did not send any delegates over to make suggestions for the Articles of Confederation. Over the course of a few months, the delegates worked on adding and strengthening the government that they spoke about in the Articles. At the end, thirty-nine of the fifty-five present delegates signed the Constitution.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

When the United States first gained their independence from Britain they needed to create a strong government for their colonies. The United States created their first government called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles came with many problems like no power to tax, no power to enforce the law, or regulate commerce. 10 years after having a weak government, they believed that a new type of government need to be created in order to become a strong government. They came up with the Constitution.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Before the famous Constitution became published on September 17, 1787, there was a huge democracy over it since some people supported it (federalists), while others opposed it (anti-federalists). Basically the main arguments used by the Anti-Federalists in the discussion of the U.S. Constitution was the fact that the Constitution offered too much power to the federal government and that the rights of the people were not promised through a Bill of Rights. In order to get their words out, they had ratified convections for the thirteen states. They choose to go to Pennsylvania first because of its size, influence, and wealth.

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

 The federalists support the Constitution as presented by the convention delegates where as anti-federalists opposed the constitution and claimed that it gave the national government too much power, which erode states authority and endangered individual

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

I am Arthur Washington of Virginia and I believe that we should fully back this new constitution that has been created in Philadelphia. The current system we use the Articles of Confederation is too weak and broken for us to ever be able to correctly ratify it. We can not be a nation that is weakly connected together as it is slowing down the progress of this great nation. We need to remember that “Independent America was not composed of detached and distant territories, but of one connected, fertile, wide spreading country”(Jay 55).

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

The ratification of the constitution first needed to be approve of two thirds of the thirteen state governments before it became accepted as the law of the land. While there certainly were people who were happy with the constitution there are also many who were suspicious of it. Those people who were afraid was because of a strong powerful federal government. To kind of ease people’s fears and to state what it was all about they wrote a series of essays that are known as the Federalist papers.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

The constitution was the collective child of (9 of 13) STATES. Some of those states, like Virginia, only ratified this document by 53% a small majority, by representatives, not the people directly voting. 9:13 is 69% if that requirement of 69% was imposed on each state to ratify, this constitution would not exist. Not overwhelming popular at the time, but pushed hard by the likes of Hamilton; creator of, the bank of New York, a global bank. Some of those, reluctant and suspicious of this new Centralized Power wanted more protections for the people that had fought and won their independence from another Central Power, the King; thus the Bill of Rights, after the ratification, "We must pass it first" Sound familiar?

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document