ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Reconstruction

609 Words3 Pages

What do you think of reconstruction? Do you think reconstruction was successful or unsuccessful? Why do you believe that? If you were to ask a group of 11th graders at NexGen Academy, they would agree that reconstruction was unsuccessful for many reasons. Of course, the era had pros however more cons appeared during this time. For one, Abraham Lincoln was killed, second, the Klu Klux Klan made lots of conflict during this time, and third all of the trouble brought about by the South. First of all, reconstruction was a time right after the Civil War, beginning in 1877. Essentially, the purpose of reconstruction was to rebuild the North and the South’s peace after the Civil War created conflict. On the bright side, slavery died with the war. …show more content…

Lincoln created the “Ten Percent Plan” also known as, “Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction” asking for peace. The North and South was split up into two groups, the free states, and the slave states; North being free, South being slave. Radicals wanted to take the land from the South, however Abraham Lincoln wanted peace and for the two sides to become one again. He gave a “free pass” and said anyone who wanted to come back to the North was welcomed back, no penalty for “betraying” America, voting rights were given as well. One night, Abraham Lincoln and his wife went to the theatre with some friends, without a guard, John Wilkes Booth snuck his way into the presidential box, shot Lincoln in the back of the head, and killed him. After this tragedy, Andrew Johnson becomes the 7th president of The United States. Not long after becoming president Johnson was given the nickname “Jackass” and that’s where the Democratic party flag came from. Jackson was no Lincoln, for the first time in history an individual tried to assassinate Johnson, however missed twice. This is because during “Presidential Reconstruction” Johnson did not want to free the

Show More
Related
225 Words | 1 Pages

In the article “The New View of Reconstruction,” Eric Foner writes about the difficult time that the United States go through the Reconstruction era. Also, discusses the different point of view or interpretation that Reconstruction era had over the years. The author Eric Foner describes the Reconstruction era as a difficult time after the Civil War. The Reconstruction was from the beginning and before 1960 as a time of exceptional debasement and control of the freedman.

Read More
118 Words | 1 Pages

The Reconstruction was unsuccessfull because of some important reasons. First, the South was still aracist part of the United States because they created the Jim Crow Laws, what means that the people who lived and administratedthe South were not intelligent. The second example is that Abraham Lincoln, who started and incentivated the Reconstruction, was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, so it made the Reconstruction process to be less efective. Finally, the last problem was the Solid South, it is a name that the South recieved because it was a solid white, solid racist and solid Democrat, what means that they were not able to support black people. Concluding, all of these examples shows why the Reconstruction was unsuccessfull

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

I’ve never done a research paper throughout high school so this task was definitely a “roadblock” for me. I started off looking for topics in my handy dandy history book; the Give Me Liberty!: An American History Seagull 4th edition by Eric Foner. What seemed to catch my eye was the Civil War Era. The Civil War has always been one of the most fascinating issue to me behind WWI and WWII since I was in middle school.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

After the civil war and with the assassination of President Lincoln the south was forced to go through the reconstruction. Reconstruction was a highly oppressive system, under the guise of readmitting states into the union that the north used to make the rebel states pay for the civil war. The south was lawless to a certain degree and those who had been part of the confederacy were punished severely. Even coming to a point of having to beg the president for their rights For all practical purposes the north made reconstruction as hard for the south as possible, and because of this reconstruction caused more harm than good to either side.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

A few days after the civil War ended, President Lincoln was assassinated and never had the chance to implement his Reconstruction plan.   The Reconstruction Era occurred in the period of 1865 to 1877 under the reign of President Andrew Johnson who was the predecessor of President Lincoln.  Congress was not scheduled to convene until December 1865, which gave Johnson eight months to pursue his own Reconstruction policies. Under his Reconstruction policies, the former Confederate states were required to join back into the Union and heal the wounds of the nation.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

During the period of Reconstruction, there were many positives and there were many negatives. Reconstruction was the North’s attempt to readmit the Southern states back into the Union through a set of steps or requirements. The act of Reconstruction was hotly debated on whether to treat the South with forgiveness or to punish them for starting the war. There were positives and negatives to the multiple Reconstruction plans set forth by the U.S. government, but many could agree that the positives outweighed the negatives.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

Although it was not realized at the time, determination was a prominent element that provoked success amongst our nation. The endless trial and error involved with the reconstruction shows our nation’s commitment. Reconstruction was a stressful new experience, but the courage to keep going generated motivation for our country. The Jim Crow laws were an example that went against the morals of reconstruction. These laws were considered an insulting reference to Blacks (TCI

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

The first plan, the Abraham Lincoln plan, took place in 1863, right before he was killed. He wanted to do nothing about the four million slaves that were set free. Even though he was considered the “Great Emancipator” for the slaves. He also did not want to punish the defeated confederates, which caused a bit of an uproar in the North. He even allowed the confederate states to return

Read More
137 Words | 1 Pages

i personally do not believe reconstruction would have succeeded even if president lincoln had not been assassinated. i dont think reconstruction would have necesarrily completely failed either, more so his death or survival would not have changed the end result. the reconstruction period was ultimately so long, we can now look back and see it would have required too much from one president to resolve all impending matters. Lincoln's ten percent plan was supported by Republicans, mostly because it was seen as a quick end to the war, not exactly a perfect plan for reconstruction. President Lincoln did not have a set blueprint for reconstruction.

Read More
150 Words | 1 Pages

No, I disagree with this proposition that Reconstruction was a missed opportunity. In the history of the United States, "Reconstruction" refers to the policies between 1863 and 1877 when the U.S. focused on ending the slavery, demolishing the Confederacy, and rebuilding the nation and the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln’s whole post war idea was to facilitate and reconciliation but he was assassinated and we left with Andrew Johnson. Although the slavery was banned, segregation created new social injustice, which lasted for another century. Economically speaking, the South was never recovered completely and there were specific problems left unsolved over state rights.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

The national debate over Reconstruction began during the Civil War. President Abraham Lincoln announced his comprehensive plan for Reconstruction, the Ten Percent Plan. Lincoln’s plan was known as the 10% Plan. It was simple. With a few exceptions, Lincoln offered pardons to any Confederate who swore allegiance to the Union and the Constitution.

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

Tensions were starting to get higher , many cities were from procrasination and were starting to get ruined , the Emancipation Proclamation had declarced force against the proclamation and abe lincoln said “forever free,” and the question of a national identity hung in the air. A plan for Reconstruction, the time period after the civil war that was marked by a sense of rebuilding, was desperately needed. Three different proposals for bringing the Southern states back into the Union were considered: President Lincoln’s, Vice president andrew johnsons ,and the Radical Republican Plan. President Lincoln began formulating a plan back in 1863 nearly 4 years before the war

Read More
1326 Words | 6 Pages

1. Many historians consider reconstruction to be a failure. Post Civil War, the Union had won and set to appease the southern ex-Confederacy through reconstruction. Abraham Lincoln had issued the Emancipation Proclamation and the amendments freeing the southern slaves and granting them citizenship. But after his assassination, Reconstruction plummeted.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

Reconstruction a Failure or Success? Throughout the years, America has gone through many different political changes. Many presidents selected with different plans for our future. Sadly, many of those objectives have failed or came to an end.

Read More
1848 Words | 8 Pages

He had proposed his blueprint for Reconstruction, which included his Ten Percent Plan in 1863. It stated that a southern state could be readmitted into the Union once ten percent of its voters swore an oath of allegiance to the Union. The South needed to be physically reintegrated back into the Union. So, the Ten Percent Plan was a notion of physical reconstruction of the South. And just as it was being debated in Congress, President Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth in 1865.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Reconstruction

Open Document