Pros And Cons Of Tanning Beds

With a simple phrase in any search engine, you will find countless articles showing definitive proof that tanning of any kind can be harmful. Artificial UV exposure such as tanning beds tend to be the argument of the decade waging war on those who care about other's health way too much vs people who want to appear darker for looks only to be seen 30 years later as a wrinkled, and leathery sun spot attraction. There tends to be little ground on the people in the middle. To those who maybe go tanning for a week straight for a wedding or a comparable large occasion, a tanning bed may not be life threatening. Many who carry a genotype of melanoma will not be aware due to it staying dormant; however, very little UV ray exposure could act as a catalyst to that same carrier.

Because of the population that bears little risk, I believe it is arbitrary to restrict artificial UV exposure such as tanning beds to all. The manufacturers are very upfront with the warnings and risks posted directly on the machines themselves and all salons will require you to sign before use. It may not be the best option to utilize a tanning bed with no many alternatives such as a spray tan, but we cannot ban them for everyone due to a small percentage having a possible reaction. I would compare this to a very common condition, peanut allergies. We simply do not ban all peanut products even though the number of children in the U.S. with a peanut allergy more than tripled between 1997 and 2010. I believe that a mandatory screening or physical should be conducted by your primary care physician before a tanning bed could be available to use at a salon. This would allow the person to be fully aware of their particular risks. No matter the outcome of the screening, the person should still be allowed to utilize a tanning bed but not so unless they have proof of a completed screening by a health care