ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

579 Words3 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was written in the beginning, because the citizens of America feared the government. The people wanted a new system that was organized and protected its people from Wars, attacks, and most importantly a stronger and reliable economy. In my opinion, there were more weaknesses than strengthens: 1. Congress lacked the power to collect taxes. 2. There was no judicial branch. 3. Each state had their own currency so there was no stable national currency. 4. The government couldn’t pay its debts. 5. There was no executive leader to make sure laws are followed. Due to the absence of power, shown and given by Congress that blocked the central government of having its authority and power. The Articles of the Confederation had multiple issues that turned into weaknesses in which the creation of the Constitution was built in the first place. There were a good …show more content…

To resolve these issues the Constitution created the federal government and also with three different types of branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. As a result, without this, the government court framework would not have been able to have any real way to authorize these new laws. Do I think that the country we live in today is in need of a revolution? I would have to say no because a revolution would send this country right back into unemployed citizen and a depression. Why put a bigger burden on this country when this nation is finally going in the right direction. Besides our current president. I think the American Constitution is the at its best when it has as ever been written. This nation was built off of love, liberty, and freedom. For everyone to be equally looked at, no matter your color, race, culture, and ethnicity. People from other countries

Show More
Related
940 Words | 4 Pages

Some of the problems with the Articles of Confederation were each state had the power to collect is own taxes, no universal currency, had the power to provide for its own militia. Also the national government lacked the power to compel states to honor national obligations, collect taxes or regulate commerce, and there were no courts to resolve issues among the different states. The American citizens also could not identify with the central government. There was no executive branch, no president, no national court system, and no effective way to

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were not the ideal set of laws that the founding fathers intended. They had their flaws, but they also contain a few laws that fixed some current problems of the country. The problems that faced the new nation were, the need for unification and preservation of this unification of the states, the rules emplaced on expansion and settlement of western lands, and it set up a economy, that was vital to the country. The states had just won the revolutionary war by coming together to fight the British, and the Articles of Confederation made sure that this unification was official and permanent.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

After the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, thirteen American colonies desired a government to displace and overturn the rule of British. So, they attempted to establish a governance of the Article of Confederation. As the first written constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation was not faultless. The Articles formed a weak central government and a loose confederation of sovereign states, leaving most of the power and independence with the state governments. Although the document gave Congress authority to make treaties, coin money and maintain army force, the central government still lacked of ability to implement these rules (Foner, 1991).

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was made because America needed a government after the war. One of the flaws were that they had no national army. This led to to the constitutional convention because they were vulnerable to attacks and couldn’t defend themselves. Another flaw was was that they couldn’t tax so the government was broke. That led to the constitutional convention because the government needed money to pay back the debts that they had.

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

Behind ever great country there is a strong central government. To a country that just took its independence from an empire, there should be a document to allow a strong central government and rule of law. Powers should be divided equally among the branches of government. First, I summarize the main points of the Articles of Confederation. Then I will focus on the cons of the Article of Confederation and was it the right decision that America should have relied on this paper or should they have had a constitution?

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

As it applies to the Articles of Confederation there were many weaknesses in the way it went about governing the United States. For one, the loose federation of the states was too weak to act as a foundation to be considered or act as a central government. In addition the state legislatures had too much power and in turn had the ability to influence economic issues of all kinds. This strong legislature is the same one that allowed for mob ruling and actions by debtors. The Articles of confederation were also weak because the required congress to have all 13 colonies in agreement when a new tax was to be passed.

Read More
104 Words | 1 Pages

The Articles of Confederation created a confederation in the United States. A confederation is a government in which the state government, not national, has dominant power. The leaders of the new nation feared that a strong, centralized government would lead to tyrannical monarchy like the British government. So the Founding Fathers established a confederation where there was no president nor Supreme court, and a Congress with limited power. But the existence of a weak congress led to an ineffective national government.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

This resulted in more legislative laws and amendments being passed to create a strong economy and government. Another main weakness in the article of confederation was the lack of a strong central government or authority. This was made possible by the lack of an executive branch to enforce laws and coordinate policies, as well as a lack of a judiciary branch to resolve conflicts and disputes between colonies; this led to constant conflicts between colonies and a lack of authority and correction throughout the government and the United States. This was later corrected when the constitution put three branches of government into play: legislation, judicial, and executive. The legislative branch was primarily Congress's main job was to make the laws that were to be enforced.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

The primary weakness of the Articles of Confederation is that each state retained all sovereignty over itself. Sovereignty is defined as ultimate authority over someone, something, or someplace. Although the National Government had enough power, it gave too much to the states. This lead to a plethora of problems that harmed the government of the United States under the Articles of Confederation. One example of this was the states did not have to pay the government taxes.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

Read More
1997 Words | 8 Pages

(1) During the years 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation were created in order to provide a means for an effective government for the United States. Since they were a newly formed independent nation, they required in having a stable government that help keep the country organized. The eleven states would create a document that would become the Articles of Confederation. From the start it would only crash and burn for it had a weak central government that did not contain an executive or judicial branch that we do today, which would make the state governments handle their own affairs. The reason behind such a poorly implemented document was due to the fact that the colonists did not seek to have a government that would merely replace one

Read More
93 Words | 1 Pages

One of the major problems with the Articles of Confederation is that power was established state by state and limited power to a central government. The Constitution fixed this by balancing powers between the states and the Federal government. Also they created three branches of government: legislative, judiciary, and executive. Other solutions to the Articles of Confederation made by the Constitution were levying taxes by Congress, Congress having the right to control trade between states and countries, amendments became easier to ratify, and the executive branch had the power of checks and

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

Related Topics

Open Document