The late 17th century was a time of radical transformations and floods of independence. As the United States developed, a government that suited the needs of its citizens was imperative for the success and flourish of the new nation. The Constitution surfaced as a document to placate those dissatisfied by the distasteful Articles of Confederation. The numerous conciliations and adaptations composing the document have led to the term “bundle of compromises.” The ever-changing nature of the Constitution has resulted in it being considered a “living document” in the present day.
a) The Preamble to the Constitution was written by Gouverneur Morris with the intent of setting goals for the newly formed nation- goals that are continued to be accomplished
…show more content…
Each branch is “checked” or restrained by the other two in several different ways. For example, the president can veto a law passed by Congress. However, Congress is able to override this veto if there is a vote of two-thirds in both houses. Even if the President and Congress agree on a law, the Supreme Court has the power to declare a law unconstitutional. President Andrew Jackson utilized his veto power when he vetoed the Bill for Re-chartering the Second Bank of the United …show more content…
Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalists, they believed in the loose construction of the Constitution and were pro- Great Britain and industry. They believed that the wealthy and educated should lead and favored a strong-central government. The Antifederalists, on the other hand, were led by Thomas Jefferson and believed in the strict construction of the Constitution. They were pro- France and farming and favored a strong-state government in which the people were to lead. The two opposing parties were forced to compromise in order for New York to ratify the