Pros And Cons Of The Crucible

1561 Words7 Pages
The Director’s Notebook:
The Salem witch trials of the spring of 1692 began after a group of young girls in Salem Village, Massachusetts, started having symptoms of being possessed by the devil which then led to the accusations of several local women of witchcraft. Hysteria broke out in Salem; a special court convened in Salem to hear the cases. 19 people were hanged, and 150 more men, women and children were accused over the next several months. By September 1692, the hysteria began abate and public opinion turned against the trials. (http://www.history.com/topics/salem-witch-trials)

Why did I choose this play?
After reading several quotes from The Crucible by Arthur Miller, I became intrigued on finding out more about this wonderfully horrid play that is based on the infamous Salem Witch Trials of 1692.
The pros:
The Crucible is a very famous play, which caught my attention that the analysis of such a play might be more complex than those of other plays. Also the idea that it is based on true events and true people made the play more appealing, for the history would be accurate. Arthur Miller dramatized the events of the Witch Trials and made the story even more interesting, where he showed manipulation and power more clearly. Miller showed the devil within people in a different way than other play writes would have. He made sure that the characters that were power hungry and manipulative were shown clearly. He showed the corruption in Salem and how many innocent people