ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

526 Words3 Pages

¨The death penalty issue is obviously a divisive one. But whether one is for or against, you can not deny the basic illogic - if we know the system is flawed, if we know there are innocent people on Death Row...¨Richard LaGravenese. The death penalty is a example of a cruel and unusual punishment and life in prison is a much better option.
The death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, is more expensive than life in prison, and people are frequently falsely convicted and murdered because of it. ¨Death penalty in specific cases has caused more murders¨ (Rob Warden). This shows that the death penalty is not effective and does not help with punishing people who murder. ¨A couple was being robbed and they recognized the person robbing them (someone that escaped the death penalty) and he shot the couple for knowing that¨ (Rob Warden). This proves that the death penalty does not help but in fact causes more deaths. …show more content…

¨Death penalty is only legal for about 2/3 of the states¨ (Kenneth Shirley). The death penalty is still legal in most states but it still is not ok and that proves that this is a problem. ¨There is so many cases that prove that the death penalty goes to fast¨ (Rob Warden). This shows that they wrongly convict people frequently and that is a unfair punishment.

Innocent People are killed by a cruel and unusual punishment every year. ¨1 and 25 death row convicts are wrongly convicted¨ (John Wihbey). This shows innocent people are killed because of death row being to fast. Innocent people's lives could have been saved if the death penalty had not existed or at least if it had a slower moving death row. ¨More Americans support life sentences then the death penalty¨ (Rob Warden). This shows that Americans are not comfortable with the frequency of false

Show More
Related
321 Words | 2 Pages

The most essential argument against the death penalty is that it is immoral. Regardless of how you look at it, the death penalty is slaughtering, and murder is never right! A further take a gander at the profound quality of the death penalty is required, on the grounds that albeit homicide is considered an ethical total, this is not generally the situation. This can be discussed through the virtue ethics theory. Virtue Ethics is the main non-defective theory of morals and was established by Aristotle.

Read More
125 Words | 1 Pages

Although Texas is the state with the greatest number of death row sentences and executions, it has one of the highest crime rates in the entire nation. Therefore, the death penalty is ineffective because it does not diminish the incidence of crimes, take the life of innocent people, is racially unequal, costly, and alternative measure can be implemented

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

Jet, vol. 103, no. 9, 24 Feb. 2003, p. 4. EBSCOhost, 2.Cushing, Renny and Adrianne Haslet-Davis. " Should the Death Penalty Live?. " Time, vol. 185, no. 21, 08 June 3.Von Drehle, David. " Bungled Executions.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

There has been much controversy over capital punishment over the years. Few people in the United States see capital punishment as being wrong. It is said that Canada is way too easy on their criminals because they do not punish the convicts by the death penalty. Canada says that the United States is way to strict on their criminals because they execute their convicts by the death penalty. Should murderers be murdered for their crimes or should they spend the rest of their lives perishing in prison, that question may soon some day be correctly answered but for now it is strictly your own belief, possibly this essay may change your mind if you are for the death penalty.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

The Death Penalty Information Center has discovered that the states with the death penalty still have higher murder rates that those without, some years even up to a forty percent difference. Additionally, the south accounts for eighty percent of all executions, yet it still has the highest crime rates. Therefore, it is statistically proven that the death penalty is not doing what it was created to do, lower crime rates. There is also the belief that the death penalty is the “easy way out” for the criminals because then they don’t have to face the hardships of prison. The criminal also wouldn’t have to live with what they had done and think about their life choices.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

The death penalty is a form of justice and has been implemented on persons who commit certain crimes, in order to maintain balance in the justice system. In support of this, the death penalty would prevent and deter other persons from committing these certain crimes. As a result, these certain crimes may decrease in quantity and happen a lot less frequently, which could be beneficial to the public and possibly for the long term. Along with this, the death penalty would allow anyone who may have been affected by the crimes committed, to feel closure and allow them to feel like justice has been served. For that reason, the death penalty may be considered necessary, and prove to be somewhat

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

The Death Penalty The argument for criminals to receive the death penalty, also known as Capital Punishment, has been an on-going debate for years. This issue has been very hasty in the United States because people have their own opinion on this topic. A majority of people believes that the death penalty should be passed as a law in the states, but others think that criminals should just have life in prison. If a criminal was to commit a murder(s), the person should receive the same treatment as a person they killed, death.

Read More
2035 Words | 9 Pages

By keeping the tax low that work keep the gas prices low and keep all the people happy. The death penalty saves people from serial killer from getting out of jail even at an old age having an influence on any other person to commit a murder. This study goes with this case because Christopher Simmons was bragging to people about what he had done. If he would have been put to death there would never be a chance of him getting out and hurting anyone ever again.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

This is technically proven since states with a death penalty have a higher murder rate then ones without one. Executions might have worked as a deterrent when people were hung publicly, had their heads removed, shot down by firing squad, and even when done using the electric chair. The big problem with all of these is also what made them genuinely effective, the brutality. Now we administer a humane drug cocktail. Nobody cares, sure most people don 't want to die, but most people on death row actually do, because

Read More
131 Words | 1 Pages

Throughout the years death penalty has become less popular. The public opinion asserts that incarceration is far worse punishment than the death penalty. Death penalty is unconstitutional, everyone has the right to live. The death penalty was created as a punishment to the extreme of extreme cases, but now states are using it constantly and randomly. The death penalty has many flaws.

Read More
1394 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty has been a system of punishment since its establishment in 1608 when Captain George Kendall became the first recorded execution in the new colonies. As the deaths caused by the death penalty per year began to lower, the levels of controversy surrounding its use began to rise. Today the death penalty has become more of a burden than a boon to society. I believe that in its current form the death penalty is a costly, discriminatory, and cruel system that needs to be reformed. One reason the current death penalty needs to be reformed is it costly system..

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Over the last decades there has been a lot of controversy about rather the death penalty should be supported. The biggest controversy revolved around society questioning if the government should reserve the right to execute murders. Many argued that murder was murder regardless of who's committing it. They believed that allowing the government to execute murders was a conflict of interest because the government suggest that murder is a cruel crime so they also shouldn't be allowed to commit it because they make the rules regardless of the circumstances. Individual thats support the death penalty believe in the “eye for eye” theory which basically suggest if someone takes a life there life should also be taken from them for the crime the committed.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion the idea that the death penalty should be abolished can be supported by many reasons that include extensive evidence. With the death penalty still established we are putting innocent people's lives at risk, spending millions, and continue with racial segregation. The idea that someone's opinion in court can decide the fate of another person is

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Many believe that executing criminals is a way to protect them from future crimes. Although it may seem to be a logical reason, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty decreases crime. In my opinion the death penalty is an outdated ancient form of punishment. It is also considered to be immoral to some religions, for example in the Bible it says: “Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death.” (Exodus 21:12).

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document