Pros And Cons Of The FED And The World Bank

804 Words4 Pages

The world's most powerful multi-billionaires were not willing to risk losing even a portion of their wealth to a democratic system of government with a capitalist economy.

The world's richest billionaires are socialist's. They prefer the economic system of communism or socialism because it allows them to distribute wealth as they see fit, while keeping more for themselves. Capitalism keeps the playing field competitive, taking away their advantage of stealing more from the people.

Don't get me wrong, American captitalism has had it fair share of crooked businessmen and corrupt politicans who have abused the weaknesses of capitalism as it was written with fairness in mind, but left itself vulnerable to those who would exploit it through its weakness. …show more content…

They tricked Wilson into believing that abolishing the gold standard was the only way the American economy would ever flourish.

Since that fateful day in American history, our economy has been held hostage, free-falling through a never-ending cycle of unpayable debt. Instead of gold backing every dollar in circulation, the value of the American economy became loans on government bonds, issued by the FED. Ultimately, the World Bank, controls the FED and the World Bank is controlled by the socialist elites.

Our fate was selaed when Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act, forever changing any intent the framers of the constitution had for American democracy and economic prosperity. You can read Wislons memoirs in any number of publications. The cost to do so is about 40 dollars but you also pay the price of trading your happiness in for