ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The House Of Representives

829 Words4 Pages

After the war the United States was in debt that caused Hamilton to come up with the idea of a national bank. In call for the House of Representives, Hamilton wanted to be supported by them to obtain public credit. Hamilton wanted to reduce the national debt and stabilize the nations national currency even by increasing it .Hamilton’s report on the bank was seemed to be a financial prosperous administration to finance and help improve the publics credit .Hamilton seen this as a great idea and then began to acknowledge the advantages of the bank . Hamilton saw that the bank could potentially not only just help the government but could help the citizens in their personal lives as well. This bank could also help benefit the government to use it …show more content…

As agreed with Jefferson Madison believed that we should strictly follow the constitution .The creation of the bank was not in the 10th amendment which led him to believe that it should then be up to the citizens and the government’s decision .The main argument with Jefferson and Madison was that the ability to control commerce did not have the ability to create a national bank. Jefferson saw the bank as something that wasn’t fit for the nation. Jefferson stated “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies". With that being said he was just in fear of increasing future nation debt that would damage us even more .As Jefferson still arguing that congress did not have the right to create a bank it was overturned and he lost, because the bank was actually found …show more content…

As it all came together the bank seemed to be a great thing that would increase effectual aid and provide energy to trade. Shortly after the gentlemen of Virginia rejected the bill by saying it was a suffering to the country because it was not debated like all the other bills. Ames proceeded to say that all of the laws in the constriction should be supported and should be decided by congress not by men. Therefore it was believed that it was too much animosity with some people and the bank and that it needed to be overlooked and debated more carefully. This led him to wonder if the corporate powers could even stretch the constitution like that. After noticing the powers to lay and collect taxes he swept the clause. He wanted them to consider if the bank would actually help increase the nation. Because we adopted the constitution he stated congress could be the only ones to make the

Show More
Related
512 Words | 3 Pages

He promoted assumption of the states debt, which in turn, chained the states to the federal government and shifted the attachment of wealthy creditors. Though despite southern states protest, that it was unfair that some states received a free pass, since many of them had already paid their debt off, Hamilton’s plan was still approved. Hamilton went on to propose and create the Bank of the United Sates, The federal government ended up owning one-fifth of the bank, allowing them to control large sums of money, with little room for opposition on how and where it went. Despite Jefferson argument that there was no authorization in the constitution for such an economic octopus, Hamilton argued that the bank was not only necessary but also proper. This is turn evolved the theory of loose construction by invoking the elastic clause of the constitution- a model for enormous federal

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

James McCulloch v. State of Maryland 17 U.S. 316 Supreme Court of the United States Certiorari to the Maryland Court of Appeals Decided March 6, 1819 Facts and Procedural History: The facts of the case are as followed: The second bank of the United States was chartered by Congress in the year 1816, but because of that, two states prohibited the bank from operating inside of their boarders. Now that the state of Maryland made it known that it did not want that National Bank, in 1818, the Maryland legislature made a tax on loan operation of Baltimore Branch on the second bank of the U.S.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Hamilton's economic plan turning point was on the promotion of manufacturers and commerce. While Hamilton distrusted popular will and believed that the federal government should use considerable power in order to steer a successful course, Jefferson placed his trust in the people as governors (Holmes). Hamilton's plan was to establish a bank like the one in England to maintain public credit; strengthening the states' debts under the federal government, and enacting protective tariffs and governments subsidies to encourage American manufactures. All these measures strengthened the federal governments power at the expense of the states. Jefferson opposed these views from Hamilton he feared that the Bank of the United States represented too much English influence, and argued that the constitution did not give congress the power to establish a bank.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had different opinions on how the First National Bank of The United States should be set up and if it goes by what is stated in the Constitution, which led to an argument between federalist and antifederalist in 1791. Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, was a strong believer in the development of a strong central government and broad a interpretation of the Constitution. On the other hand anti-federalist, Thomas Jefferson, was convinced that the government should have to undergo a strict interpretation of the Constitution and that the government shouldn't interfere, more than needed to, in the lives of the American people. Hamilton recommended that the government should in fact make the Bank of the

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

The title of the book, Hamilton’s Blessing, is extracted from the action by Hamilton of creating the first bank in the United States which continues to stand even today. The creation of the bank created a critical political issue starting from 1791 and years that would follow. The big idea by Hamilton does still exist even in today’s economic environment. The proposal by Hamilton was met with widespread resistance from individuals such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. It was necessary to create a federal bank because of the benefits they oversaw would be achieved in the future.

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

Hamilton was a strong supporter of a national bank to boost the economic welfare of people. On the other hand, Jefferson thought a national bank was unconstitutional

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Hamilton and Federalists argued against Jefferson and Democratic-Republicans on the topic of the national bank by questioning the meaning of the word necessary. Hamilton supported the loose interpretation of the Constitution and claimed that since the bank would significantly improve the economy, it would progress public good, thus making it necessary. The Elastic Clause supported Hamilton’s interpretation because it allowed Congress to pass any laws necessary (Doc D). The decision to install a national bank created a lot of angry Democratic-Republicans and further damaged national unity. Although he argues against it, when Jefferson took over as president he allowed the charter to run out.

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

Hamilton took a more liberal perusing of the condition and said that Congress ought to do anything it felt was important to do national obligations. Jefferson held that the condition implied that Congress ought to just take activities that were completely fundamental, and no more. In 1791, Hamilton recommended that the United States contract a national bank to deal with Revolutionary War obligation, make a solitary national cash, and invigorate the economy. Jefferson contended that the formation of a national bank was not a force allowed under the identified forces, nor was

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

He successfully argued for the assumption of state debts by the federal government and the establishment of the first national bank – a private, but partially government-owned institution. He firmly established the principles of financial trading. Due to his efforts, the creditworthiness of the United States was restored. Hamilton’s accomplishments as Treasury Secretary were not achieved without a struggle. His congressional opponents tried to exhaust him by demanding detailed reports on the workings of the treasury department with incredibly short delivery dates.

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

Hamilton interpreted it loosely while Jefferson was strict. This led to an argument about whether the creation of a national bank was constitutional; Hamilton stated it was while Jefferson claimed it wasn’t. Another issue that they clashed

Read More
1449 Words | 6 Pages

Hamilton 's monetary course of action for the nation included working up a national bank like that in England to keep up open credit; cementing the states ' commitments under the focal government; and initiating guarded tolls and government enrichments to empower American makes. These measures fortified the administration 's vitality to the hindrance of the states. Jefferson and his political accomplices limited these progressions. Francophile Jefferson expected that the Bank of the United States addressed an inordinate measure of English effect, and he battled that the Constitution did not give Congress the capacity to set up a bank. He didn 't assume that propelling produces was as basic as supporting the authoritatively settled agrarian base.

Read More
1568 Words | 7 Pages

Hamilton wanted to create public credit with a treasury system, a national bank, a mint, and increase manufacturing which would help unify the country. On the other hand, there was Jefferson, who opposed a strong central government. He argued that the “wealthy would gain at the expense of ordinary Americans and that Hamilton’s political economy would corrupt the morality of citizens and undermine the social conditions essential to republican government”(Powerpoint). The country would opt for an approach closer to Hamilton’s views. One of the first acts was the National Banking Act.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

The need for a national bank was very much so necessary. Hamilton also convinced president Washington to sign the bank bill by his lengthy report that stated: “This criterion is the end, to which the measure relates as a mean. If the end be clearly comprehended withan any specified powers, collecting taxes and regulating the currency, and if the measure have an obvious relation to that end, and is not forbidden by any particular provision of the constitution, it may safely be deemed to come with the compass of national authority.”

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Another proposition he had, was to form a national bank; which would be known as the Bank of the United States. Hamilton based this idea off the Bank of England. This bank would be owned by the federal government and private investors. The purpose of the bank would be to use it as a financial and depository agent of the government. This would help the nation have a stable currency.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists who believed that if the Constitution didn’t allow something, it was forbidden. Hamilton and the Federalists were loose constructionists who believed that if the Constitution didn’t forbid it, it was allowed. He explained his loose constructionist views in “Hamilton’s Opinion as to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States,” saying, “If the end is clearly found within any of the specific powers, and if the law has an obvious relation to the end, and it is not forbidden by any particular provision of the Constitution, it may safely be deemed to come within the compass of the national authority.” The National Bank held money for the nation, funded the government, and put private and public money together for a capital pool. Hamilton liked the National Bank because it loaned money to

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The House Of Representives

Open Document