ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Missouri Compromise

198 Words1 Pages
Class,

The Missouri Compromise did not effectively deal with the sectional conflict over slavery. This is because the compromise did not result in a definite solution that left both sides pleased but instead left neither side content (Kennedy 235). If the sectional conflict was resolved, this could have helped to prevent the secession of the southern states in the American Civil War, or this could have caused the American Civil War to start sooner rather than later.

I believe that the North got the better side of the deal. At this time, the North and the South were worried about political and economic balances, and it seems like this compromise gave the North an advantage (Kennedy 234). This is because Congress gained the right to ban slavery
Show More
Related
119 Words | 1 Pages

It can be argued that the Missouri Compromise not only put off the start of the Civil War, but was also a cause. Many contributing factors led up to the Civil War in the years following the passing after the Missouri Compromise. Years after the Missouri Compromise went into effect, Congress passed the Tariff Act of 1833, sometimes called the Compromise Tariff. This was proposed by Henry Clay, and called for the gradual reduction of tariffs, ending the Nullification Crisis. In 1846, United States’ President James Polk requested 2 million dollars to purchase land from Mexico following the Mexican-American War.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.

Read More
1891 Words | 8 Pages

The Missouri Compromise however had effects larger than simply distributing the land. The Missouri Compromise would further prevent a larger conflict between the north, and south in the immediate future. This made both sides even more restless to fight for their respective causes. The compromise

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

Before the South‘s secession the Missouri compromise helped a lot in keeping balance. After Missouri requested to be a slave state to the Union, Congress knew that it would cause an uproar between states that were and weren‘t slave oriented. Due to this, the Congress created the Missouri compromise to keep balance between everybody. On May 3, 1920 the compromise was put in place which meant that it set Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state still creating perfect balance. As the Missouri compromise was in place it was condemned by plenty of Southerners but even with that it lasted and kept peace with everyone as well as help keep the Union together for more than thirty years.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

“But this momentous question, like a fireball in The night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union” (Jefferson). This is from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Holmes in 1820 talking about the issue of slavery and the Missouri Compromise, and Thomas Jefferson was afraid that the Congress may keep on compromising to satiate the south’s want for slavery. The people in the north and the south kept I arguing till the Civil War, whether slavery should be continued or if they should get rid of this abominable institution, but Henry Clay did not want there to be a civil war so he helped write a compromise to keep the peace between the feuding halves of America dreaming that peace would be achieved. Even though many people in the south of America through the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be beneficial, it ultimately failed, and it only postponed

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

The Missouri Compromise came as a two part solution to the admission problem. First, Missouri gained admission to the Union as a slave state, with a provision that portions of

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was an attempt by the United States government to diffuse the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery had arisen in the recent years due to the expansion of the country. The question of slavery in every new territory rocked the nation. The Missouri Compromise was one of the government’s last attempts to fix it diplomatically.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

The admission of Missouri to the Union was met with discontent because many believed it would disrupt the tranquility of having an even number of slave states and free states. The solution was raised to admit the newest northern state of Maine into the union as a free state, maintaining the balance. After this decision was made, they banned slavery in the new territories above the latitude of 36°30’. This solution was referred to as the Missouri Compromise. This may have been seen a victory because of its limitation on the spread of slavery, but the compromise also led to slavery also becoming more deep-seated in the southern way of

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The Congress on the other hand wanted to end slavery and allow them the vote right

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

This compromise stated every thing north of a specific longitude and latitude were never allowed to become slave states. The Missouri Compromise was violated by a Senator in a free state upsetting citizens in other states. This was seen as a slap in the face of those that viewed slavery as a vital part of their way of life. Many people of the time had very deeply rooted feelings and traditions that either supported or loathed slavery. Each group was trying to force their personal beliefs on each other which helped fuel a long building rift.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

The South did not like the Missouri Compromise, though. They did not like it due to the fact that Congress would now have the power to make or change any rules dealing with slavery if they felt that they needed to (Forbes

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Missouri Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document