ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act

1131 Words5 Pages

The USA Patriot Act is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The USA Patriot Act was passed by Congress as a reaction to the fear based oppressor assaults of September 11, 2001. The Act permits government authorities more prominent expert in following and blocking interchanges, both for motivations behind law authorization and remote insight gathering. It gives the Secretary of the Treasury administrative forces to battle debasement of US budgetary foundations for outside tax evasion purposes; it all the more effectively attempts to close our outskirts to remote fear mongers and to confine and evacuate those inside our fringes; it builds up new violations, …show more content…

budgetary framework for individual pick up by degenerate outside authorities and encourage repatriation of stolen advantages for the nationals of nations to whom such resources have a place. • Allows law authorization to utilize reconnaissance against more violations of fear. Under the watchful eye of the Patriot Act, courts could allow law implementation to lead electronic observation to explore numerous normal, non-psychological warfare violations, for example, sedate wrongdoings, mail misrepresentation, and international ID extortion. Operators additionally could get wiretaps to research a few, yet not all, of the violations that fear based oppressors regularly confer. The Act empowered specialists to accumulate data when investigating the full scope of psychological warfare related violations, including: substance weapons offenses, the utilization of weapons of mass devastation, murdering Americans abroad, and fear mongering …show more content…

This revision was largely in response to Edward Snowden’s exposure in 2013 of the government’s bulk collection of phone and Internet records. The USA Freedom Act stipulated that the government can access such data only after submitting public requests to the FISA Court. (House Judiciary Committee, 2017) Title VIII – Strengthening the Criminal Laws Against Terrorism Section 808: Defines numerous existing crimes as a “federal crime of terrorism” if “calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct.” Section 814: Prohibits damaging through hacking a government computer "used by or for a government entity in furtherance of the administration of justice, national defense,

Show More
Related
174 Words | 1 Pages

This act increased the federal powers imposed on the citizens in order to help their efforts towards investigating terrorists. These powers included telephone taps, internet taps, voice mail, grand jury information, immigration, money laundering, and crime. While these powers made it easier for the government to track down possible suspects of terrorism, it interfered with the people’s right to privacy. All the provisions under the Patriot Act can be used on the citizens with the approval of a court order. Furthermore, it interfered with the Fourth Amendment.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction Signed into law on 26 October 2001, the US Patriot Act was meant to strengthen security controls and provide Americans with an opportunity to act in the defense of their freedom. Caused by the September 11 terrorist attacks, this rule was intended to help Americans protect themselves from future similar strikes. However, since its enactment 16 years ago, this legislation has provided a veil with which impunity and civil rights violators can hide behind as they perpetrate crime in the name of national security. The act augmented safety and intelligence agencies' powers to acquire confidential information.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The Patriot Act is one of today’s most controversial laws. The law’s official name is the USA PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. The law was passed in 2001 after the September Eleventh terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. The act greatly increased the power of the government in preventing terrorism, but it also increased the amount of surveillance that the government performs on citizens.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The moment that the Twin Towers fell in New York, America became destined for change. In the wake of these attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was quickly passed through congress, and signed by then-president, George W. Bush. The act itself gives the FBI and other government agencies the ability to do and use certain methods, many of which are already used by other law enforcement organizations, to help prevent future terrorist attacks. Since then, this piece of legislation has been the center of much debate and controversy. But, there is ample reason to believe that the Patriot Act is needed and effective.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

Recently the right to privacy has been severely threatened by the Patriot Act. The USA PATRIOT ACT, which was made a law on October 26, 2001 by president George W. Bush, let criminal investigators use whatever tools necessary to find terrorist attacks before they happened; USA PATRIOT ACT is short for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001". This was made a law in response to the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center in NYC on September 11, 2001. Law enforcement officials were given better resources to fight financial counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering schemes that funded terrorists. The Patriot Act’s definition of terrorism also gave

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

The USA PATRIOT Act passed in the days following the September 11 attacks was passed to give law enforcement agencies more power to track and prosecute suspected terrorists. While stopping terrorism is a noble goal, eroding the constitutional rights of Americans is not. The Patriot act denies Americans their

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

On September 11, 2001 the world came to a stand still as a terroristic attack targeting our country killed 2,977 people. As fear ran high in every American house hold, the government quickly acted and on October 26 President George W. Bush passed the USA PATRIOT Act. The full title, "Uniting and Strenghtening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act", suggest how the government quickly acted in response to the new threat that we were experianceing. Although some may argue that it violates our civil liberties, the Patriot Act serves as an asset to help protect U.S. citizens by stopping terrorist attacks, giving the law enforcement tools to make investigations easier, and increases national security.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

The US Patriot Act, passed in 2001 due to the events on September 11th, specifically Section 215 of the U.S. Patriot Act, allows the government to gather “foreign intelligence information” from anyone in the US (citizen or not) without a warrant. The government should not be allowed to obtain information from companies/people without going through the law, because it violates the Constitution, it takes unnecessary info, and fosters government control.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

In 2001 after the tragedy of 9/11 President George W. Bush passed the PATRIOT Act. The act is supposed to protect Americans from future terrorist attacks, but what it's actually doing is defying most principles this country was founded upon. Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act enables the FBI and the NSA to listen to the phone records of millions of Americans. Not only is the government invading the privacy of millions, but the way it's being done is illegal. The government is invading on the personal lives of people who have never been suspected of being a terrorist.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

The first clear usage for the Patriot Act is that the world is still a dangerous place and that we need this form of protection to stop all types of terrorist attacks, including that of domestic ones. Less than a month ago, tragedy struck at a Florida High School when a former student took guns into the school and killed 17 people. As the days go

Read More
1482 Words | 6 Pages

This book explains how the NSA was able to detect the two terrorists, and how this led to breaking the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Which only limited them to spying on enemies outside the country, but after 9/11 they had abandoned this policy and began spying within the United States. Bamford illustrates that after 9/11, the NSA had access to an infinite amount of data, and they used this access without obtaining any legal documentation from courts. This process, as Bamford termed it, “warrantless wiretapping”. Meaning the NSA would “wiretap” without consent from the government or anything, violating American laws and even American

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

The war on terror – prompted by the 9/11 terrorist attacks – has resulted in the change in law enforcement in concern for nation’s safety and privacy. The USA Patriot Act was the first legislation in the awake of 9/11. Forty-five days after the September 11, terrorist attacks on the United States, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.” The purpose of this act is found in its full name. It was created with the decent intention of finding and prosecuting international terrorists operating on the land of America and secure our nation from future terrorist attacks.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

It is argued by the opponents of the act that it delays issuance of search warrants notifications so law enforcement agencies may delay giving appropriate notice for conducting a search. The act has been renewed to limit the governmental powers in obtaining information from those people who are being the focus of investigations for terrorism. I believe the governent shouldn't have been limited. If the individuals are getting investigated, the government has reasoning for doing so, therefore, it's

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

"Internet privacy has recently been a hotly debated issue. If the government does not have probable cause or a warrant to monitor internet activity, then they are not permitted to do so. I base this off of the Fourth Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ” Making this claim, I believe that the Patriot Act, the National Security Agency’s surveillance, and practices like these are illegal.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

The USA Patriot Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 was created after the events of 9/11 to help the government strengthen domestic security by expanding the power of government institutions to allow them the necessary tools to better track down threats to public safety. It gives them the authority to monitor citizen communications, collect bank statements and credit reports, and track suspicious internet activity. The Patriot Act should be supported as it is for the safety of the American public to help in the fight against terrorism. First and foremost, Patriot Act was created in the best interest of the safety of US citizens. Since the Patriot Act is controversial for

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act

Related Topics

Open Document