ipl-logo

Pros And Cons On The Colony Of Boston

540 Words3 Pages

Self Defence, or Murder? On March 5, 1770, on the main road of the colony of Boston, the soldiers of Captain Preston fired their guns towards the colonist who were violating their personal space. What is unknown is to weather Captain Preston said the order to fire the guns or not. Of those who were there to presence the act, few who are brave enough have come to speak for those in trial. First we have Jane Whitehouse, who claims that Captain Preston is NOT guilty. She says to have been enough meters away to witness the act but not talk with anyone. Jane insists that Preston did not order fire, but that he clearly said “Don’t fire”. “The mob was very violent and was distinctly violating their personal space, so why not defend themselves?” Next we …show more content…

He finds him innocent because at the end of the day, his soldiers fired, not him. Then, Daniela Calef asserts that Captain Preston is guilty, because he had one simple responsibility, his soldiers! “They breached the fundamental human right of living! Even if someone fired without order, there was enough time to stop them from the first shot, to the second. The question is, why didn’t he stop it?” Finally, we have the most important witness of them all. Captain Preston. He declares he didn’t say fire, but clearly, I state, “Don’t Fire”. “My soldiers are young and inexperienced, they acted out of self defence for they were just simply, very scared. It’s like this, would you blame a baby for crying if it’s was scared? After all, we were simply serving our rightful king. If we have all ready created a “massacre”, why would we want to spread it by killing me and my soldiers? They and myself have families to take care of that will probably be burned or be mistreated after we’re killed. Let’s not waste more innocent lives, and stop this once in for all”. After such a speech from each of the witnesses, who are we to believe? All it’s left to do is to see how the Prosecution and the Defence bring their

Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

A shot was fired and several men were killed. Although it was never proven, accounts from a few witnesses say that the Colonial Militia shot the first bullet, but the British were indeed the ones who fired first. “The shot heard around the world”. An analysis on the multiple first hand accounts proves that the British were indeed the ones who fired first because of the fact that they were marching upon Lexington to destroy colonial militia stores, and because

Read More
236 Words | 1 Pages

Boston 1777 during the revolutionary war there was three sides the patriots,loyalists, and the neutrals. If I was in 1777 during the war I would have been on the patriots side. They believed in complete independence, inspired by locke and paine, and they provided the troops. During the revolutionary war the patriots believed in complete independence from england.

Read More
267 Words | 2 Pages

The evidence, from the 7 eyewitnesses, support that the colonists were the aggressors during the fateful evening of March 5, 1770, the Boston Massacre. Some cited evidence proves it. Number one, “I saw the people throw snowballs at the soldiers and saw a stick 3 feet long strike a soldier upon the right” (Theodore Bliss). In other terms they were assaulting the soldiers with pieces of snow or ice at them, afterward they hit one of them with a 3 foot club. This shows that the soldiers didn’t shoot to murder, they shot in self-defense.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

In the early 1760’s, the tension between the people in Boston and the British soldiers started to grow until in early 1770, when the two groups reached their breaking point. On March 5, 1770, a group of men started intimidating a British soldier; he soon called for assistance but eventually the crowd had grown to practically one hundred people. Captain Thomas Preston and seven other soldiers arrived, trying to calm the situation down, but to no avail. A soldier fired into the crowd followed by the other soldiers firing soon after, resulting in five people being killed. Captain Thomas Preston happened to be arrested and charged with murder.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

This makes sense because if he did give the command to fire the gun, he would have been killed since he was standing in front of them. Another supporting fact is that there was a man standing next to Preston, in FRONT of the soldiers, who witnessed what happened. The evidence was on his jacket where it showed the scorched cloth from the

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

1, Which account is a primary source? Both the The Boston Gazette and Country Journal and Captain Preston's account are primary sources, though the second is more reliable. Because they both appeal to people who were primary observers, but there are degrees of confidence in the given source. Newspaper are writing from a third person about what different people told them in their accounts, instead Captain is telling the situation he lived himself. 2.Where is the bias in the Newspaper Account?

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The First Shots The American Revolution commenced with an explosive start in 1775, in Lexington, Massachusetts. Gunfire was exchanged between British soldiers and American militiamen, leaving men from both sides wounded, and for an unlucky few, dead. This event has been remembered throughout history, preserved in personal accounts and history texts, but what we have always been uncertain of is this: who fired the first shots? Accounts differ; some insist the British fired first, some say the Americans did, and some say they couldn’t really tell. However, because of personal bias in the accounts, pressure to argue for one side of the story due to who the accounts are being presented to, and how long after the event the account is being given, we can never figure out which side fired first.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

On March 5, 1770 a street fight occurred between a mob of Boston citizens and British soldiers. The soldiers were increasingly unwelcome in Boston so the citizens threw snowballs, stones, and sticks at the group of soldiers who had been stationed here- the soldiers retaliated. The citizens were very outnumbered and the fight resulted in five deaths and six injuries from Boston. Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty named this event the Boston Massacre. The morning after, John Adams was sitting in his law office when Paul Revere revealed an engraving that showed Thomas Preston (captain of the British soldiers) ordering troops to fire at point blank range on the citizens.

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

Even if those claims made by Calley about the massacre were incorrect, since international law and the military code of conduct expressly forbade the killing of civilians, it was still the responsibility of the chain of command to ensure that Calley knew those policies. (Bodenner) It said that by covering up the deaths of all but 20 civilians, but the officers hid a much greater war crime. The commissioner did not learn what Seymour Hersh discovered later; U.S. officers in South Vietnam destroyed papers describing the massacre.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

All through history, wars have dependably been battled about the oppression of rulers, for example, the English common war. When they initially began, American provinces had what's coming to its of wars, for example, the French and Indian War, and the War of 1812. The revolutionary war was most striking in American history as it was the first occasion when somebody conflicted with their homeland, and roused different nations to do the same later on in time. The Patriots activities were legitimized amid American Revolution as the British were exhausting them without their assent, they abused the homesteaders without giving any regard, and they likewise gave brutal penalizing to the nationalists for their activities.

Read More
238 Words | 1 Pages

Something that had one of the biggest impacts on the world as it is today is colonization. There’s no way that the world we live in would be the same without it. From colonization, a multitude of good things came out of it, such as wealth for many nations, new land discovered, and colonies established. However, all of those things came at a price to others. The negatives of colonization affected the Native Americans (North, South, and Central America) and the Africans.

Read More
1305 Words | 6 Pages

It’s been over 200 years since the original thirteen colonies of America fought their revolutionary war against Great Britain, in hopes of achieving their independence. We shall be going through a few areas of the Revolution, such as the military, social hierarchy, the role of men and women during the war, the colonists’ values of equality and their social contract response to the British government’s abuses, and we’ll compare these areas to the present day. The American Revolution started around April of 1775, when British redcoats and American militiamen exchanged gunshots in Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. However, that was only the beginning of the fighting; the reasons for the war date from years prior, when resistance from the

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

Plymouth Colony was founded in 1620, at Plymouth, Massachusetts, by Pilgrims who arrived on the Mayflower, a ship carrying settlers. The Massachusetts Bay Colony wasn't settled for another 11 years. History When the Pilgrims first arrived in 1620 it was the local Wampanoag Indians who taught them how to grow or plant crops. The Indians and the Pilgrims went on to celebrate the first Thanksgiving in the New World together.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

William Shakespeare lived in England in the 1500s, living to witness the reign of Queen Elizabeth I and her successor King James I. His famous play Macbeth was written for the King in his early years of reign. King James I was a descendant of the real Banquo; an accomplice of Macbeth who aided in the murderous deeds, which led to speculation that Shakespeare had altered the facts about Macbeth 's reign and Banquo to please the King, as he was a patron of Shakespeare 's acting company. Macbeth himself was based on a real Scottish king of the same name that ruled in the 11th century, centuries before the development of the play.

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

Towards the end of the Middle Ages, the monarchy began to expand their power and influence, eventually becoming absolute rulers. Having support from the merchant class, the monarchy attempted to unify and stabilize the nation states. In the late seventeenth, early eighteenth centuries, with hopes of expanding English trade and acquiring a broader market for English manufactured goods, the nation states were wealthy enough to fund voyages of discovery and exploration. Over time, ten colonies were established along the Atlantic coast of North America. The first permanent English settlement was established in Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607 and in 1620 a ship landed in Plymouth, Massachusetts, marking it as the second permanent English settlement.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons On The Colony Of Boston

Related Topics

Open Document