ipl-logo

Pros And Cons To Blame For The Boston Massacre

646 Words3 Pages

In recent discussions pertaining to Thomas Preston, a controversial issue discussed has been whether he was innocent or guilty in the events of the Boston Massacre. On one hand, some people dispute that Preston was faultless. From this perspective, it is believed that he was not to blame for the actions of his troops when they opened fire into the crowd. They believe the bitter actions of the troops should not reflect onto Captain Preston. On the other hand; however, others argue that Preston was undeniably at fault as he gave the commanding orders to fire. According to this view Preston should be held responsible for the massacre in which he was supposedly at fault. My own view is that Thomas Preston did not give the command to his troops to open fire into the crowd of protesters and the verdict of innocent at his trial was very well justified. On March 5, 1770 a totality of five colonists was shot fatally while six others suffered from non-fatal …show more content…

Some individuals falsely accused the captain, Thomas Preston, of giving his soldiers the command to open fire into the crowd. However, there is no direct evidence pertaining to this crucial accusation. The person who shouted out the order to fire remains a mystery. Several key witnesses who were present during the massacre and saw clearly the face of Thomas Preston was standing right with, or near him, makes it obvious that he does not order his troops to fire into the crowd of protesters. Ebenezer Hinkley, a lady who stood close in proximity of the Boston Massacre, verified that she never heard the word to fire coming from the Captain Thomas Preston. Another witness, Peter Cunningham, stood approximately four feet from the captain also witnesses that he never once heard the

Show More
Related

Captain Thomas Preston: Necessary Or Justified?

1400 Words | 6 Pages

The reality of what truly happened that night are ambiguous; some witnesses claim that Captain Thomas Preston ordered the soldiers to fire into the crowd while others say that he did not. After reviewing the testimonies given by witnesses, it is unquestionable that Captain Thomas Preston was innocent since witnesses place the Captain in the front of the soldiers, one of the soldiers is observed being hit by an object resulting in his firing of the first shot and

Read More

How Is Thomas Prestons Guilty

672 Words | 3 Pages

Preston is indeed guilty. Mr. Preston was seen yelling the words fire. We have a witness saying that he saw Preston’s mouth when he said it. Gentlemen of the Jury, please take into consideration that many of the other depositions, especially the depositions for Preston, are not fully descriptive as the depositions of the witnesses for the king. Many of the depositions for Preston are only a few sentences, however, the depositions of the witnesses for the king have a full story as to what actually happened.

Read More

Thomas Preston: Innocent Or Guilty In The Events Of The Boston Massacre

1366 Words | 6 Pages

In recent discussions pertaining to Thomas Preston, a controversial issue that has been recognized is whether he was innocent or guilty in the events of the Boston Massacre. On one hand, some people dispute that Preston was faultless. From this perspective, it is believed that he was not to blame for the actions of his troops when they opened fire into the crowd. They believe the bitter actions of the troops should not reflect onto Captain Preston. On the other hand; however, others argue that Preston was undeniably at fault as he gave the commanding orders to fire into the crowd.

Read More

Boston Customs House Breaking Riot

757 Words | 4 Pages

Another British Soldier who was Matte Kilroy was pointing his musket at two other attackers. “At one point they were saying ‘you can’t kill us all, fire! You dare no fire’” says Captain Thomas Preston. In

Read More

Boston Massacre Dbq

505 Words | 3 Pages

So overall I believe that the Soldiers were innocent and did not want to kill colonists, that makes the Boston Massacre not a massacre at all just a act of self

Read More

Whose Fault Was The Boston Massacre

949 Words | 4 Pages

The historical question was who’s fault was it the colonist or the soldiers. Some people disagree with this event because some of them were against the soldiers and some of them were against the colonists. The disagreement or debate about this this event was whether who believe the colonists or the soldiers. My answer to the historical question is that

Read More

Pros And Cons On The Boston Massacre

260 Words | 2 Pages

Preston was standing behind his men when in reality he was indeed standing in front of them which really doesn't seem to fit. From the primary source from Captain Preston's recollection from the Boston Massacre stated that the colonist were throwing snowballs and attacking the soldiers with heavy clubs. In the miniseries

Read More

The Crucible Dbq Analysis

1039 Words | 5 Pages

And died.” (Doc F) In doing this both men had consequences, some worse than others, and instead of lying and saying the names of people that truly didn’t do anything they refused to in a sense testify. All of these points both relate to McCarthyism and The Crucible. People became selfish and only saw their benefit, neither had evidence to prove anything that they were saying, and people say what effect it was having and started to figure out what was going on so they refused to testify and accepted the consequences.

Read More

The Boston Massacre: Self-Defense Or Self Defense?

158 Words | 1 Pages

he infamous street fight that took place in Boston, Massachusetts is referred to as The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. The riot started when a few young boys began to throw stones and rocks at British soldiers who were guarding the Customs House. The crowd around the boys started to grow larger and larger, and then people from the crowd begun to join the boys, throwing ice at the soldiers and taunting them. The soldiers then fired, killing five colonists.

Read More

What Did We Learn About The Boston Massacre

536 Words | 3 Pages

This lesson was effective because it showed you what different people thought of the same event. In many people 's accounts it was biased, but others close to what we believe is the truth. An example of a biased depiction of the Massacre is Paul Revere 's engraving, which he actually copied from Henry Pelham. It depicts a line of British soldiers firing on unarmed colonists, and the British commander giving them an order to fire, while in real life the colonists were taunting the British and has weapons such as sticks, snowballs and small knives. Also, only one British soldier fired after a colonist hit him with a stick, which proves that while Revere 's engraving is famous, it is not even close to accurate.

Read More

Reasons For The Boston Massacre

232 Words | 1 Pages

According to the article, Preston has tried to avoid unnessesary conflict between the colonist and his troops. He wanted everyone to leave in peace. However, one of Preston’s soldier did not obey his command and started to fire at the mobs. As the result, Preston is responsible for death in the Boston Massacre. Preston’s indecisive actions have indirectly led to the uprising of Colonies.

Read More

The Boston Massacre: The Incident On King Street

735 Words | 3 Pages

The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.

Read More

John Adams Biography Essay

974 Words | 4 Pages

Defending that the first solider only started shooting upon the crowd because it 's a normal response for anyone who 's facing a life or death situation. The jury acquitted six soldiers while two other soldiers was charged with Manslaughter. Many reacted to Adams defense for the soldiers hostile and his law practice suffered greatly. But later his actions built him a reputation by others who taught he was courageous, generous,

Read More

Essay On The Boston Massacre

558 Words | 3 Pages

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops

Read More

The Boston Massacre: The Cause Of The American Revolution

764 Words | 4 Pages

There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons To Blame For The Boston Massacre

Related Topics

Open Document