ipl-logo

Pros And Cons To Get Rid Of Animals Essay

483 Words2 Pages

Should animals be used for entertainment ? Some people think world would be more safer without animals because they think animals mean to hurt use and that’s why some people agree to get rid of animals. This controversy was discussed in an video “Mox News” the people think animals increase the deaths of lives. For example an whale trainer was killed by an killer whale and this isn’t the first time this whale killed a whale trainer so the trainer went to the killer whale to calm he or she down when a man hopped out of the whale’s tank and got away that’s when the whale killed the trainer. That’s why some people agree to get rid of animals. Others say why get rid of animals when make people happy. While the authors Present their argument to the audience, they used different rhetorical devices to persuade the audience to support their side of the argument. …show more content…

To begin with the video there trying to persuade the people to stop liking animals and don’t go to shows with animals in them. Another similarity is they both used the same reason in the argument. The other side the people who like animals said we need to come up with solution so we wouldn’t have to get rid of animals like we can go step by step with the animals to train them to not hurt use. The other side of the argument said we should just get rid of animals permidelty. The final similarity is they both give a biased argument. “The people who like animals are saying it’s not time to get rid of animals forever.” “The people who like animals are also saying the people who don’t like animals are overreacting.” “Although the people are on different sides they state their opinions and

Show More
Related

Jeremy Rifkin The Rhetorical Exercise

159 Words | 1 Pages

The Rhetorical Precise I chose was one of the first ones that we have done. It was the Rehtorical Precies that was a response to Jeremy Rifkins Editorial “A change of heart about Animals”, This specific assingment perfectly demonstrates a rhetorical analysis. The Rhetorical Analysis also demonstrates my ability to analyze the text effectively. It shows that I can explain what an author’s claim is. I wrote that Rifkin was arguing that the Animals’ have the same feelings that humans have, which explains why animals in the world express the way they do.

Read More

The Rhetorical Analysis Of Sarah Mclachlan Animal Cruelty

869 Words | 4 Pages

Thousands of animals across the United States are being beaten, starved, abandoned, and left to defend for themselves. Animal cruelty has become a nationwide problem in today's society. In the Public Service Announcement (PSA), "Sarah McLachlan Animal Cruelty", produced by the ASPCA, this commercial persuades the audience through pathos appeals, but the PSA's representation of the appeals of ethos and logos are showing animals in America suffering from cruelty and neglect every day. The ASPCA and spokesperson, Sarah McLachlan are trying to convey a message to the public that there is an urgent need to donate money to save the lives of animals being abused and neglected. This appeal to the ethical(ethos), emotional(pathos), and logical(logos) senses of the audience to expose the evils of animal cruelty and convey to the audience that animals are in need of help.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of What's Wrong With Animal Rights By Vicki Hearne

123 Words | 1 Pages

In her work “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights,” Vicki Hearne challenges common beliefs of animal rights, arguing that animal rights groups do very little to actually benefit animals. She argues that natural selection should be allowed to take place for wild animals, and animals such as cats and dogs should not be seen as property. To persuade the audience to support her position, she uses ethos, pathos, and logos. Her credibility as a trainer makes the logic behind her views reliable, her logic reinforces the examples she uses, and she appeals to emotion using her relationship with her Airedale, Drummer, to support everything her argument is saying. Through these strategies, Vicki Hearne effectively counters the current, popular views of the

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Film 'Plant-Based Diet'

1249 Words | 5 Pages

The objective of the film was to influence viewers to switch to a plant-based diet while avoiding animal consumption. Anderson and Kuhn utilize various visual techniques and rhetorical appeals to ethos and logos to support their argument that the causes of many diseases can be linked back to diet. While the film uses clear rhetorical techniques to present its argument, the overall argument is ineffective due to its broad claim and distorted presentation of positions. The first rhetorical strategy used by the film that will be analyzed is the appeal to pathos. An example of this would be the woman crying because she has to take medicine for the rest of her life.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Factory Farming By Matthew Scully

1104 Words | 5 Pages

This essay targets conservatives whose job is to preserve and uphold the value of society. Scully is encouraging conservatives to get up and do something about how unfair animals

Read More

Comparison Between 'Shooting An Elephant And Consider The Lobster'

156 Words | 1 Pages

George Orwell and David Foster Wallace both utilize human understanding and relationship to animals in order to appeal to readers’ emotions. Orwell appeals to readers emotions in “Shooting an Elephant” by descriptively describing the death of an elephant while Wallace does so by discusses the suffering a lobster experiences when boiled alive in “Consider the Lobster”. Although Orwell’s essay is metaphorical and depicts a larger political message, both pieces present arguments for animal rights. In “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell creates a situation in which morality is questioned and uses the elephant as a metaphor in order to present the message of how a majority can influence an individual. Wallace’s “Consider the Lobster” uses modes of

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Dialectical Writing And The Wildlife Protection Community

1835 Words | 8 Pages

First and foremost, it is crucial to write clearly and concisely, steering clear of technical jargon and using language that a broad readership can readily understand. In doing so, members of the wildlife protection community can more likely engage their audience and convey a message effectively. In addition, presenting intriguing stories and examples can help make wildlife protection issues more relatable and compelling, generating empathy and concern among readers. For example, a personal story about how a particular animal or ecosystem has been affected by human activities can encourage readers to express compassion and worry. Moreover, wildlife protection messages should be based on accurate scientific information.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Is Hunting Moral?'

813 Words | 4 Pages

This illustrates how the author uses simple appeals to convey ethos and provided facts and statistics, as well as emotional appeals to support his claim. He tried to use personal examples, but referred to in the beginning of his article, “As a non-hunter, I cannot say anything about what it feels like to shoot or trap an animal” (Is Hunting Moral?). This shows that he has not had a first-hand experiment with the issue and makes the reader believe that this is misrepresentation of his

Read More

Extinction In David Quammen's 'Planet Of Weeds'

845 Words | 4 Pages

For instance, the text’s portrayal of the debate between Myers and Simon rebuts the notion that a human ingenuity can stem the extinction. It’s hard for the audience to believe in Simon’s bullish claim “that human resourcefulness would solve all problems worth solving” when the text later calls Simon’s argument as a “worst disservice to logic” and “pooh-poohing the concern over extinction” (60). As said earlier, Simon is also an economist debating against a scientist on the issue of extinction. The framing of the Simon’s argument makes the readers side against Simon and the notion that human is able to save the

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Animal Shelter

530 Words | 3 Pages

I will be arguing that kill shelters shouldn’t exist. I will first give you the statistics of how many animals are killed a year. Secondly, I will argue that some animals shouldn’t always be in the situation, In addition, I will argue that there is things people can do so there isn’t pet overpopulation.

Read More

Are Zooz Bad News Report

273 Words | 2 Pages

People should be more involved with animals. Humans should be more involved with animals much more than they already are. In the story “Are Zooz Bad News” one particul tiger had enough, this tiger attacked some humans, because they were taunting her. The tiger was obviously not in a mentally good condition. This was probably because they had not had much human interaction for a while.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Pro-Hunting

520 Words | 3 Pages

That hunting is cruel and that they shouldn 't just be killed because their older animals. But these will be people that don’t really get how much their helping out wildlife. Would they rather have just one animal put down by a human, or have three or more animals of the same species killed by the one animal that a human could of put down. The hunters will also not try make the animal suffer that 's not human nature. They will do their best to make sure the animal goes down as quickly as possible for it not to suffer.

Read More

There Should Not Be Zoos Essay

773 Words | 4 Pages

There should not be zoos. Thousand of animals every year struggle with the same problem, being locked up. Although this may seem like a questionable argument, this is a major problem in this world and it needs to be fixed now. In this essay there should not be zoos because they make animals unhealthy, they treat animals badly, and animals are better off in the wild.

Read More

Controversy: The Use Of Animals In Entertainment

445 Words | 2 Pages

Should anmals be used for entertainment all around the world? Some peple say no animals should not be used for entertainment because it can damage thier wildlife. Other people say animals should be used for entertainment because of the awards and prizes they get. This controversy was discused in a video,” Should Animals Be Used As Entertainment” an article,” The Use Of Animals In Entertainment” another article,” Jump To It”. While the authors presented their arguments to the same people, they used different sources to persuade the people to support their claim.

Read More

Research Paper On Animal Cruelty

993 Words | 4 Pages

“The simple truth is that animals should not be used for human amusement. The process is often unnatural and cruel from start to finish” (DeRose 2). Obviously, the use of animals for entertainment purposes is unnecessary. There are many other ways to be entertained, people who want to entertain by choice. As a result, if there are people willing to perform by choice, why should society allow animals to perform by

Read More

More about Pros And Cons To Get Rid Of Animals Essay

Related Topics

Open Document