ipl-logo

Pros And Cons To Get Rid Of Animals Essay

483 Words2 Pages

Should animals be used for entertainment ? Some people think world would be more safer without animals because they think animals mean to hurt use and that’s why some people agree to get rid of animals. This controversy was discussed in an video “Mox News” the people think animals increase the deaths of lives. For example an whale trainer was killed by an killer whale and this isn’t the first time this whale killed a whale trainer so the trainer went to the killer whale to calm he or she down when a man hopped out of the whale’s tank and got away that’s when the whale killed the trainer. That’s why some people agree to get rid of animals. Others say why get rid of animals when make people happy. While the authors Present their argument to the audience, they used different rhetorical devices to persuade the audience to support their side of the argument. …show more content…

To begin with the video there trying to persuade the people to stop liking animals and don’t go to shows with animals in them. Another similarity is they both used the same reason in the argument. The other side the people who like animals said we need to come up with solution so we wouldn’t have to get rid of animals like we can go step by step with the animals to train them to not hurt use. The other side of the argument said we should just get rid of animals permidelty. The final similarity is they both give a biased argument. “The people who like animals are saying it’s not time to get rid of animals forever.” “The people who like animals are also saying the people who don’t like animals are overreacting.” “Although the people are on different sides they state their opinions and

Show More
Related
159 Words | 1 Pages

The Rhetorical Precise I chose was one of the first ones that we have done. It was the Rehtorical Precies that was a response to Jeremy Rifkins Editorial “A change of heart about Animals”, This specific assingment perfectly demonstrates a rhetorical analysis. The Rhetorical Analysis also demonstrates my ability to analyze the text effectively. It shows that I can explain what an author’s claim is. I wrote that Rifkin was arguing that the Animals’ have the same feelings that humans have, which explains why animals in the world express the way they do.

Read More
123 Words | 1 Pages

In her work “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights,” Vicki Hearne challenges common beliefs of animal rights, arguing that animal rights groups do very little to actually benefit animals. She argues that natural selection should be allowed to take place for wild animals, and animals such as cats and dogs should not be seen as property. To persuade the audience to support her position, she uses ethos, pathos, and logos. Her credibility as a trainer makes the logic behind her views reliable, her logic reinforces the examples she uses, and she appeals to emotion using her relationship with her Airedale, Drummer, to support everything her argument is saying. Through these strategies, Vicki Hearne effectively counters the current, popular views of the

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

The objective of the film was to influence viewers to switch to a plant-based diet while avoiding animal consumption. Anderson and Kuhn utilize various visual techniques and rhetorical appeals to ethos and logos to support their argument that the causes of many diseases can be linked back to diet. While the film uses clear rhetorical techniques to present its argument, the overall argument is ineffective due to its broad claim and distorted presentation of positions. The first rhetorical strategy used by the film that will be analyzed is the appeal to pathos. An example of this would be the woman crying because she has to take medicine for the rest of her life.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

This essay targets conservatives whose job is to preserve and uphold the value of society. Scully is encouraging conservatives to get up and do something about how unfair animals

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

The book Uprising by Margaret Peterson Haddix is about a 1911 New York fire at the Triangle shirtwaist factory that killed 146 immigrant workers, which followed a citywide strike led by the workers. In this writing piece, you will learn about three key elements to support labor, women’s rights and the importance of standing up for what you believe in from the three main characters: Bella, Yetta and Jane which all come from different social situations. Bella is an immigrant from Italy who is desperate to make money to send back to her family. Yetta is a Jewish refugee from Russia and Jane is from a very wealthy family but unhappy with her life because of the many restrictions her father imposes on her due to her support of the Triangle strike.

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

George Orwell and David Foster Wallace both utilize human understanding and relationship to animals in order to appeal to readers’ emotions. Orwell appeals to readers emotions in “Shooting an Elephant” by descriptively describing the death of an elephant while Wallace does so by discusses the suffering a lobster experiences when boiled alive in “Consider the Lobster”. Although Orwell’s essay is metaphorical and depicts a larger political message, both pieces present arguments for animal rights. In “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell creates a situation in which morality is questioned and uses the elephant as a metaphor in order to present the message of how a majority can influence an individual. Wallace’s “Consider the Lobster” uses modes of

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

First and foremost, it is crucial to write clearly and concisely, steering clear of technical jargon and using language that a broad readership can readily understand. In doing so, members of the wildlife protection community can more likely engage their audience and convey a message effectively. In addition, presenting intriguing stories and examples can help make wildlife protection issues more relatable and compelling, generating empathy and concern among readers. For example, a personal story about how a particular animal or ecosystem has been affected by human activities can encourage readers to express compassion and worry. Moreover, wildlife protection messages should be based on accurate scientific information.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

This illustrates how the author uses simple appeals to convey ethos and provided facts and statistics, as well as emotional appeals to support his claim. He tried to use personal examples, but referred to in the beginning of his article, “As a non-hunter, I cannot say anything about what it feels like to shoot or trap an animal” (Is Hunting Moral?). This shows that he has not had a first-hand experiment with the issue and makes the reader believe that this is misrepresentation of his

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

For instance, the text’s portrayal of the debate between Myers and Simon rebuts the notion that a human ingenuity can stem the extinction. It’s hard for the audience to believe in Simon’s bullish claim “that human resourcefulness would solve all problems worth solving” when the text later calls Simon’s argument as a “worst disservice to logic” and “pooh-poohing the concern over extinction” (60). As said earlier, Simon is also an economist debating against a scientist on the issue of extinction. The framing of the Simon’s argument makes the readers side against Simon and the notion that human is able to save the

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

I will be arguing that kill shelters shouldn’t exist. I will first give you the statistics of how many animals are killed a year. Secondly, I will argue that some animals shouldn’t always be in the situation, In addition, I will argue that there is things people can do so there isn’t pet overpopulation.

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

People should be more involved with animals. Humans should be more involved with animals much more than they already are. In the story “Are Zooz Bad News” one particul tiger had enough, this tiger attacked some humans, because they were taunting her. The tiger was obviously not in a mentally good condition. This was probably because they had not had much human interaction for a while.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

That hunting is cruel and that they shouldn 't just be killed because their older animals. But these will be people that don’t really get how much their helping out wildlife. Would they rather have just one animal put down by a human, or have three or more animals of the same species killed by the one animal that a human could of put down. The hunters will also not try make the animal suffer that 's not human nature. They will do their best to make sure the animal goes down as quickly as possible for it not to suffer.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Thousands of animals across the United States are being beaten, starved, abandoned, and left to defend for themselves. Animal cruelty has become a nationwide problem in today's society. In the Public Service Announcement (PSA), "Sarah McLachlan Animal Cruelty", produced by the ASPCA, this commercial persuades the audience through pathos appeals, but the PSA's representation of the appeals of ethos and logos are showing animals in America suffering from cruelty and neglect every day. The ASPCA and spokesperson, Sarah McLachlan are trying to convey a message to the public that there is an urgent need to donate money to save the lives of animals being abused and neglected. This appeal to the ethical(ethos), emotional(pathos), and logical(logos) senses of the audience to expose the evils of animal cruelty and convey to the audience that animals are in need of help.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

There should not be zoos. Thousand of animals every year struggle with the same problem, being locked up. Although this may seem like a questionable argument, this is a major problem in this world and it needs to be fixed now. In this essay there should not be zoos because they make animals unhealthy, they treat animals badly, and animals are better off in the wild.

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

The use of animals for gaming and entertainment purposes constitute animal cruelty because it is heartbreaking, unnecessary and dangerous. Initially many would argue that the use of animals for entertainment does not constitute as animal cruelty because they aren't tortured. For example, some people say that zoos are essential because it is safer

Read More

More about Pros And Cons To Get Rid Of Animals Essay

Related Topics

Open Document