ipl-logo

Prosecution In The Philippines

1181 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Role of prosecutors

INTRODUCTION

Prosecution can be defined as the process of trying to prove that the accused is guilty of a crime before the court of law. Prior to the now repealed Attorney-General Act 92 of 1992 (the AGA), which commenced on 31 December 1992, the CPA provided for prosecutions (s 2-5) and the Attorney-General was the prosecuting authority on behalf of the State. Section 4 of the CPA used to provide that an Attorney-General may, in writing:
‘(a) delegate to any person, subject to the control and directions of the attorney-general, authority to conduct on behalf of the State any prosecution in criminal proceedings in any court within the area of jurisdiction of such attorney-general, or to prosecute in any court …show more content…

It is very paramount to know how a person is appointed and how he or she is supposed to carry the deliberations of the state, and the section provides that any person to be appointed as NDPP or DNDPP must possess qualifications that would entitle him or her to practice in all courts in the Republic and, furthermore, must be fit and proper person, with due regard to his or her experience, conscientiousness and integrity, to be entrusted with the responsibility of the office concerned. The case of NDPP V Similane addresses the issue of presidential appointment in terms of section 38 of the NPA Act which some of the requirements are given on the …show more content…

Sylla Moussa, who is a Guinean national who, during June 2006, was charged with 16 counts of fraud, alternatively, three counts of theft and three counts of money laundering in terms of the provisions of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (the POCA).
Because of the nature of the commercial transactions in relation to which the appellant was charged, the National Prosecuting Authority (the NPA) took the view that it required the skills of a specialised prosecutor and thus engaged the services of Mr Zirk Pansegrouw (Pansegrouw), an advocate in private practice and member of the Pretoria Bar and a former prosecutor. In doing so, the NPA purported to act in terms of s 38 of the NPA Act
The section that is under the raider regarding the assignment is section 38 of the NPA Act, which provides certain guide lines that caters for the engagement of persons to perform services in specific

Show More
Related

Mr. Lazarus Flaws Of The Legal System

673 Words | 3 Pages

This case also shows the effectiveness of the legal system in protecting individuals rights to not be tried or punished more than once under section 26. This is shown as the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions had urged that it would be oppressive as he already served 11 months of his sentence therefore the acquittal remained the

Read More

Summary Of The Controversial Court Case Of Ogden Vs. Gibbons

576 Words | 3 Pages

Ogden vs. Gibbons was a controversial court case that was debated in 1824 after Aaron Ogden filed a restraint against Thomas Gibbons. Ogden and Gibbons were former business partners in the steamboat industry and for three years they successfully worked together throughout waterways in New York. Unfortunately Gibbons decided to operate another steamboat that came in conflict with Ogden’s steamboat and this is when Ogden filed a restraint against Gibbons. Ogden’s complaint was that he no longer wanted Gibbons to operate steamboats in New York waters. This was an important court case because the court had to figure out who had the power to control navigation in interstate waterways.

Read More

R V. Francis: The Attempted Murder Of Timothy Udris

1586 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction In the matter of R v Francis , the defendant (Glen Reginald Francis) was being tried for the attempted murder of Timothy Udris. On 8th June 2014, Glenn Francis (‘Francis’) attacked Timothy Udris (‘Udris’), who was hit at least two times with a claw hammer to the skull. The Crown submitted that Francis had attempted to murder Udris, under s306 Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld).

Read More

The Case Of Lindy Chamberlain

2102 Words | 9 Pages

The source examines the impact of victims being wrongfully convicted and imprisoned, and the international approach to the issue. Australia has signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) signed by the Australian government in 1972, which states once a person has been wrongfully convicted and they have received a punishment, by law they are entitled to compensation unless its proved there is an unknown fact which has arisen. However, this was never adopted into Australian law, as a result any individual wrongfully convicted and imprisoned isn’t entitled to any compensation under Australian law. Australia’s commitments to signing this is that all states and territories must meet their obligations under article 14 (6) which are incorporation of the domestic article into domestic legislation to ensure a legal right to compensation. Though a state or territory government does have the ability to make an ex gratia payment to a wrongfully convicted individual through a request or their own doing.

Read More

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Connick V. Thompson

1331 Words | 6 Pages

The American legal system hears many cases relating to liability, but surprisingly, most of these cases concern the prosecutors within their own legal system. In the Supreme Court case Connick v. Thompson, a district attorney’s office denied liability for the extreme misconduct of its prosecutors. The Supreme Court decided that the D.A. office was not liable for the actions of their prosecutors because they did not have a pattern of Brady violations. Contrary to the decision in Connick v. Thompson, the D.A. office should have been held liable for the misconduct of its prosecutors. Brady violations appeared throughout the case, other cases of Brady violations in that D.A. office, and the office’s blatant neglect to properly train its prosecutors.

Read More

Tara Brown Murder Case Summary

334 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Tara Brown’s murder, various groups of individuals are affected. As well as maintaining principles of fair punishment and deterrence, the criminal justice system has to consider perceptions of the victim’s family (secondary victim), the community’s demand for crime prevention, and the offender’s rights to a fair court hearing. The most likely outcome is imprisonment for Lionel John Patea due to committing an indictable offence. It is important to note that if this was only a case of domestic abuse without murder, it would utilise more time, effort and expenses to come to a resolution. This is due to the different circumstances and degree of abuse that the judge has to assess.

Read More

Removal Power Pros And Cons

363 Words | 2 Pages

1. When the Constitution was drafted “Article II, Section 2, clause 2 grants the President the power to ‘appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States [except those whose positions are not otherwise already provided for in the Constitution. And] Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers…in the President alone” (Presidential Powers). However, the issue of removal powers of the president where not addressed within the Constitution, therefore this issue is one that has been debated. The issue with removal power is if the president is given too much power and many member of Congress opposed this power.

Read More

RV Stinchcombe's Case: Precedent Set For Canada

880 Words | 4 Pages

Firstly, this case set precedent that when a criminal proceeding is initiated against an accused

Read More

Essay On Duke Lacrosse

680 Words | 3 Pages

Nifong and the Duke Lacrosse case highlight several key institutional failures of the justice system in regards to prosecutorial discretion, prosecutor accountability, and the prosecutors dilemma. Prosecutors are considered by many to be the most powerful actors in the courtroom proceedings as they follow the case from the time of arrest to the sentencing. Prosecutors have a lot of discretion in the justice process as they are the ones who decide: Do I prosecute? Who do I prosecute?

Read More

Mcclesky V. Kemp Case

914 Words | 4 Pages

The decision to charge or drop charges, what type of charge (such as felony or misdemeanor), or whether to offer a plea, are just a sample of the many powers that prosecutors hold. The greatest form of accountability currently on prosecutorial power are elections. However, despite this, there is still a gap between the powers of a prosecutor and the amount of accountability they hold to the people they serve. This often is a result of many prosecutors across the country running in unopposed elections or elections hinging on the outcomes of individual, high profile cases. Given the vast amounts of power prosecutors hold and how this power is exercised at various stages of the justice system, data-driven prosecution has the potential to provide more accountability for prosecutors.

Read More

Causes Of Wrongful Convictions In Australia

119 Words | 1 Pages

Wrongful convictions are a problem that most government officials won’t admit. The United States and other countries such as Australia have been susceptible to these miscarriages of justice. This can arise from a snowball effect of scenarios such as witness misidentification, perjured testimonies, coercive methods of interrogation, prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective counsel. These are some of the reasons that can potentially lead innocent people to be convicted of crimes they did not commit. The thousands of exonerations in the United States has caused concern for other nations to reevaluate their criminal justice system.

Read More

Essay On The Texas Executive

865 Words | 4 Pages

However, as noted above, the governors power to issue executive orders and appoint thousands of committee member, allows him to have an impact on the implementation of policies. Informal powers of the governor depend on the individual’s leadership style, personality and ability to effectively voice their concerns and issues. The governor chooses his staff and how it should be structured. He usually chooses people who share his views and that will be loyal.

Read More

Criminal Cases: The O. J. Simpson Case

169 Words | 1 Pages

Since the stakes are so high in these cases, there is a high burden of proof on the prosecution. The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond

Read More

Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay

390 Words | 2 Pages

The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

Read More

Essay On My Cousin Vinny

1972 Words | 8 Pages

The role that the prosecution played in the movie is the same role that the prosecution plays in the Criminal Justice

Read More

More about Prosecution In The Philippines

Related Topics

Open Document