ipl-logo

Protagoras Agnostic Argument

930 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast christianity and judiasm

Protagoras

Protagoras took on an agnostic approach to answering the question about the existence of God, affirming that one does not have enough evidence to verify or refute the existence of God. This statement is true, considering we don’t know in fact if the nature of said evidence is communicable to humankind. This explains why many religions are faith based, where their plane or reasoning does not follow a rational argument to its resolution. Rather unchallenged trust is placed in the religion and its doctrines, and this serves as the only necessary source of validity. Differences arise in the scepticism held by agnostics, while the Judaeo- Christian belief systems renounce doubt as a sin.

Gorgias

Gorgias believes that knowledge doesn’t exist due to the fact that the one’s own personal senses cannot provide the perceiver with universal access to objects. Since we only understand the world through our own sensual channels we cannot …show more content…

Alberto Knox in Sophie’s world distinguished the difference between a sophist and true philosopher, saying that the sophist believe that the knowledge they do have is justified though they contain little knowledge, while the true philosopher’s have established that they know nothing. I personally believe there are degrees of reality. While one’s experiential reality may not be the absolute objective reality, it still contains elements of true reality within it and furthermore, embodied experience. In this context we can use our senses to obtain knowledge in this degree of reality. In regards to the purest form of reality we are limited in our capacity to determine what information is derived from there. We are so limited that we do not know the reason why we cannot make that distinguished. As elements within the greater purest reality we cannot objectively stand outside of it and denote it as ‘pure

Show More
Related
1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

There is much belief to suggest that we can depend on our senses unless there is just cause or evidence suggested to question their reliability. Therefore, the belief of reality may be subjected to interpretation or skepticism, but without solid evidence to discard what we believe to be true, we should be confident in what we hold to be true. Skepticism or Justified True Belief

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

There is no way to know everything there is to know. This means that knowledge will always be inherently limited by numerous different factors. According to DesCartes, knowing can only be applied to what one has clearly observed to be true (111). Observable knowledge can be limited by things such as background and sex. However, the greatest limitation may be lack of skepticism, whether it be questioning oneself or an authority.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.

Read More
1153 Words | 5 Pages

It was heard in every sound, and seen in every thing. It was ever present to torment me with a sense of my wretched condition. I saw nothing without seeing it, I heard nothing without hearing it, and felt nothing without feeling it. It looked from every star, it smiled in every calm, breathed in every wind, and moved in every storm.” He explained that the thought of having knowledge and literacy

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

The author Paul Coehlo once wrote in his book “Veronica decides to die,” “People never learn anything from being told, they have to find out for themselves.” (Coehlo). This idea has been the singular focus of writers and philosophers over many generations. From the stories of Buddha’s enlightenment to arguments in today 's’ political sphere, the contrast of thought on knowledge and wisdom has been a source of argument in the “thinking man’s world.” Knowledge is widely understood to be what one can look at or examine.

Read More
2059 Words | 9 Pages

The human concept of reality primarily focuses on what a person sees around them and what they believe they understand. The three concepts that attach themselves to this belief system is thinking, knowing, and finally being. As I journeyed through these concepts I began to see that it is not a simple idea to truly understand reality and my place within it, rather it flows more from the interconnectedness of these three concepts. Once I grasped the individual concepts and began the path towards the full realization of potentiality that these represented I started understanding A. Square in Flatland when he proclaimed “I looked below, and saw with my physical eye all that domestic individuality which I hitherto merely inferred with the understanding.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

Truth is often a term that is taken into consideration when one is verbally speaking, but most find it rather difficult to truly define truth. While every person can attempt to uniquely give their own interpretation to what the world regards as truth, the realm of philosophy presents several brilliants ideas about the concept. In general, the study of philosophy recognizes two truths: objective and subjective. Objective truth can be described as truth that has always existed whether one knows it or not, while subjective truth is dependent on the person’s ideas and feelings towards a reality. Influential and well-known philosophers such as Mortimer J. Adler and Plato have contributed thoughts that often present similar ideas about the definition

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

A neutral location for the theological disputation

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Graham interpreted the idea that no one will know absolute truth, by saying that a “mortal being” would never achieve it based on their experiences with a certain situation. This was due to mortals believing that they had knowledge due to their experiences but the “totality” of events differed between gods and people .Michael Patzia also agreed with Oppy’s statements seeing Xenophanes views of knowledge as a “charge against arrogance and dogatsim” (Patzia). Xenophanes explained that human observations are very limited as the senses cannot explain the world of the gods which holds true knowledge. I would also agree with these interpretations as it seems to connect with Plato, who once said

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

It embodies the insight that there is a serious muddle at the centre of the whole of Descartes theory of knowledge. He says that we do not hold a clear idea of the mind to make out much. ‘He thinks that although we have knowledge through the idea of body, we know the mind “only through consciousness, and because of this, our knowledge of it is imperfect” (3–2.7, OCM 1:451; LO 237). Knowledge through ideas is superior because it involves direct access to the “blueprints” for creation in the divine understanding, whereas in consciousness we are employing our own weak cognitive resources that

Read More
1361 Words | 6 Pages

Whilst the knower’s perspective is always essential in the pursuit of knowledge, it’s essence is greater in some areas of knowledge than others. Perspective shapes both what we pursue in knowledge and it affects how we interpret pursued knowledge. Whilst the latter has greater influence over subjective areas such as the arts and history, the former affects even the pursuit of knowledge in more objective areas such as the natural sciences and maths. What’s more, for knowledge to be knowledge, there must be a knower. Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Truth is a vast subject which has encountered several definitions through times, no matter if we rather take an interest in philosophy or in literature. In fact, those definitions always meet at some point and find their oppositions which are interesting and open to more questions and so, definitions. Freud, for example, says that the love that we have for the truth is our way to recognize the existence of truth . It underlines the link between truth and reality. We could wonder if one can go without the other.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay I will write about the strengths and weaknesses of perception as a way of knowing. Perception is the way we perceive the world through our senses. We use all five of our senses, which are sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch to understand the world and interpret it. We can then say it’s a Primary way of knowledge. We can also say that, because the senses is the way our body communicates, we have at least three more senses: kinesthetic sense, which is our awareness of our body’s dimensions and movement; vestibular sense, which is the awareness of the human’s balance and spacial orientation; and organic sense, which is the manifest of the internal organs (for example, hunger or thirst).

Read More

More about Protagoras Agnostic Argument

Related Topics

Open Document