ipl-logo

Puerto Rico Vs Luiez Case Study

530 Words3 Pages

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico V.s Valle Sanchez

In the case of Puerto Rico V.s Valle Sanchez, the enforcement of a criminal procedure issue comes to question. On January 13Th 2016, It was argued before The Supreme Court that Luis Sánchez Valle was caught illegally selling firearms in the commonwealth of Puerto Rico by an undercover police officer. He was charged for the same offense and transaction, within the commonwealth and indicted by the federal grand jury (stateside). Valle-Sanchez plead guilty to federal charges and motioned to have the commonwealth charges eliminated in Puerto Rico. Questions were raised about the commonwealth being the same power as our federal government, and whether Valle Sanchez could/should be charged twice …show more content…

In Puerto Rico, (2000) gun trafficking from the (U.S and other sources), selling the selling of firearms of and ammunition had become such an extreme issue, consequently The Puerto Rican arms Act was set in place mandating laws for gun control.
It’s important to outline how large of an issue gun control is in Puerto Rico. With flourishing criminal activity and murder rates, Puerto Rican government is taking steps to knock down the criminal issues revolving around the misuse, and abuse of weapons. Let me also break down why this case is important…. Many people I’ve encountered are not aware that Puerto Rico is United States territory, therefore if you’re concerned about United States safety but say Puerto Rico is not an ‘us” problem, you’d be incorrect. I’d rather hear that our federal courts took the subject into their own hands, and we know the direct resolution to the issue. Cleaning up Puerto Rico is as important as cleaning up and aiding any state, per example Nebraska. Many beautiful things come out of the commonwealth that are not just tourist oriented. If weapons originated in the U.S are directly effecting that land, I feel like we also have an obligation to care about the issue of where our weapons end up. It is my opinion (as a country) that we should put just as much emphasis on caring for the things we the love, such as guns and tourism, rather than just choosing to utilize them. Regards to the subject of the convicted person(s) rights, I believe there was an exceptional justification in enforcing the double jeopardy violation, and charging him only one time for the crime he committed. If one doesn’t agree, how would they suggest he serves two sentences at the same time in two places if convicted in

Open Document