Entry 1: What were the differences in the way Indians were treated between the different countries? In the Europeans eyes, Indians were known as inferior and the Europeans acted as if the Indians were actually the primitive species. Considering the Indians had a different lifestyle than the Europeans and the Europeans were more advanced in their technology and political structure, made the Indians inherently less than. Compared to the treatment of the Europeans toward the INdians, the Spanish were much more courteous.
The societies Timbuktu and Tenochtitlán, despite being located over 6,000 miles from each other, had very similar declines. The fall of Timbuktu was primarily attributed to a sudden decrease in trade, whereas Tenochtitlán’s was unfortunately the result of trusting and deifying the Conquistadors, whose main purpose in travel was to conquer land. But the reason that Timbuktu’s decrease in trade damaged their society so severely was that the inhabitants had become comfortable trusting merchants from other countries to provide them with the goods that they needed in their daily lives. Timbuktu and Tenochtitlán both owe their respective downfalls to their citizens putting their own fate in the hands of strangers. Timbuktu’s fatal flaw lay in their reliance on trade.
The Spaniards gave them gifts of beads and red caps.(Doc 1) They believed these gifts would encourage the Natives to show them where the gold and other wealth was. However, as Columbus became more and more frustrated with the lack of help from the Arawaks, his treatment of them became increasingly worse. Eventually, all of the Arawaks were in slavery and were being worked to death. They were treated as sub-human and had no freedom.
A: “I only have to say that I don’t understand what the point of stealing the home of people is. They take our homes and enslave us and kill us, personally I don’t understand it and I think it is unfair. We are being depicted as ignorant savages who are not as good as the Europeans, but how are we worse?” Overall, it seems like the natives disliked Juan Ponce de León and his soldiers as well as other explorers because of the stories that they heard. The natives were so threatened that when they saw Juan Ponce de León and his crew that they killed him.
The Spanish conquest on the Mayans was a significant event during the 1500’s. The Spanish conquest brought their military equipment’s that was no match for the Mayan Indians. As the conquest continued to expand throughout Central America there was little unity among other tribes beside the Mayan empire. The reason for this is because they believe that the Spanish were much inferior to their own beliefs and ancestry.
The British people treated the Native American’s with cruelty and harshness. An example of this harshness can be seen in the life of Christopher Columbus. Columbus mistakenly discovered the Americas in 1492. Columbus and his crew exploited the Indian tribes by making them search for gold and putting them to death if they did not meet his quota. When the British finally made peace with the Native Americans, the Indian tribes tried to stay as friendly with the Americans/ british as possible.
Start a Journey Being One Hobbit and End Another “No man steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man” -Heraclitus. So a person always starts a journey being one person, but throughout the journey they may face obstacles along the way, in this case a river. But they have to problem solve and persevere to get over the river and complete their goals and more. The outcome of the journey may be bad or it may be good, but they have completed their goals and learned a lot along the way. But they have to get back to where they started this journey.
They main concern was acquire more land without the treat that Native Americans made, for that reason, the only way to establish themselves was treating Amerindians as objects, not humans. Tituba is a clear example of the
The treatment of the native inhabitants varied among the three explorers. The worst treatment of the natives was seen in great detail through the perspective of De Las Casas. During his expedition in the Indies, he and his comrades killed millions of the natives to take everything and anything they wanted. He stated, “And thus they have deprived the Indians of their lives and souls, for the millions I mentioned have died without the Faith and without the benefit of the sacraments. This is a well-known and proven fact which even the tyrant Governors, themselves killers, know and admit.
(Huffington Post). Acknowledgement: Columbus’s actions were perhaps a form of self-defense in response to the violent and aggressive Taíno people. Response: Conflicts that occurred between Columbus and the Natives were a direct consequence of Columbus’ harsh treatment toward the Natives, who had no other options beside resistance. Warrant: Compared to the French and English responses toward the Natives, the Spanish responses were the least favorable.
On these islands I estimate there are 2,100 leagues of land that have been ruined and depopulated, empty of people.” (Las Casas) Nothing positive came from the people of Spain setting foot on the land of the Indians. Depopulation was just one of many hazardous effects that the Spaniards
A big part of our history is the challenges different races had to face when fighting for their rights. There are groups in today’s society that are still battling oppression, even though they were granted rights by our government. It seems like when one door opens, another closes right in their face. One race that had to deal with oppression, and is still dealing with it today, is African Americans. Africans Americans were brought over to the United States to be slaves for Caucasian people.
One time in a kingdom far, far away there lived a brave knight named Miguel. Miguel was the town bachelor and everyone including the animals were charmed by his stunning looks and defined muscles. But, unfortunately for the women, Miguel was not on the search of love in his town. He was caring, compassionate, and kind to all women that approached him but not once did he connect with a girl because he was in search of true love. None of the bachelorettes in the town could Miguel see himself marrying, so he decided to take a trip around the country in search of his soulmate.
In the 16th Century, Spain became one of the European forces to reckon with. To expand even further globally, Spanish conquistadors were sent abroad to discover lands, riches, and North America and its civilizations. When the Spanish and Native American groups met one another, they judged each other, as they were both unfamiliar with the people that stood before them. The Native American and Spanish views and opinions of one another are more similar than different because when meeting and getting to know each other, neither the Spaniards nor the Native Americans saw the other group of people as human. Both groups of people thought of one another as barbaric monsters and were confused and amazed by each other’s cultures.
This power imbalance and these payments are key in the subjugation of the natives. Furthermore, the paternalism of the Spanish toward the Indigenous peoples is obvious: “Captain [Cortes] stared at him [Cuauhtemoc]…then patted him on the head” (p.117). Post-conquest, and still today, “difficult relations” between the descendants of the Indigenous peoples and the “others” (p.117) still exist. The European view of the natives “as idolatrous savages” or, on the contrary, as “models of natural virtue” (p.175) demonstrate the versatile and often contradictory views held. Similarly, the Aztecs at times saw the Spaniards as gods, and other times as gold-hungry savages who “fingered it like monkeys” (p.51).