Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of animal testing
Controversy of animal testing
Controversy of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of animal testing
Controversy of animal testing
Controversy of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After Sun reassures readers that the animals are completely safe and pain-free, she is able to reinforce how animal testing is beneficial through sound research. “The truth behind animal testing,” explains how specific discoveries such as insulin, blood transfusions, penicillin, so on and so forth have been unearthed because of animal testing. Today, many people can relate to these medical advances because they are so commonly used in hospitals and the medical field. Sun’s research even introduces multiple cases where animal testing was successful. One such case included Charles Chamberland who was able to find a vaccine for both cholera and anthrax through animal experimentation with little harm to the chickens he was testing.
“Hey mom can you make some chicken tonight? No, son remember our government enacted the new animal bill of rights.¨ this is a conversation that one would not want to partake in because of how absurd soundsWell we are not far from a day where one would be participating in such a conversation due to the fact that people are trying to approve an Animal Bill of Rights. The Animal Bill of Rights would cause a lot of controversy and problems in the future. Animals do not deserve an Animal Bill of Rights due to the fact that: animals are a large source of our food, animals are needed to apply research based tests on, and lastly the Animal Bill of Rights should not dictate how we treat the pets that we own Humans have interacted with animals for years, but this Animal Bill of Rights will change the way we interact with them.. A common
It does not make sense to use animals for medicine that will be taken by humans, simply because we are different. We do not have the same genetic makeup, and therefore, we should not be trusting these results. We need to discontinue the use of animals in research and introduce safer alternatives that generate more accurate results. First I will explain what type of trials these animals go through, and for what reasons.
Unfortunately, the best way to test potentially new medicines is through animal testing, and if initially successful, then by human testing too”(Jadhav). There are many benefits to animal testing, they can be used for research in medicine and for new cosmetic Scientist use animals to test how effective a medicine is and to see what the side effects might be caused. When done correctly and safely animal experimentation can be beneficial to advancement in medicine. Some researchers say that by doing these experiments they can help to save the lives of children, adults, and even animals from deadly diseases. One author that goes by the name Phil for Humanity says this: “It is considered more humane to do medical testing on animals first, then on humans first, for the obvious reason that human life is considered more precious than animals.
There are about 25 million animals that get tested on for commercial and medical developments each year. New medical treatments get tested on animals to make sure they aren’t toxic to humans and are sure they won’t cause harm. These beliefs aren’t new, and have been carried out for many centuries and have helped the medical community develop many medications that are important still today such as pacemakers, artificial joints, organ transplants, rabies, distemper, parvovirus (infectious diarrhea), infectious hepatitis, anthrax, and tetanus. Scientists should be able to test on animals because the animals we use are similar in body structure as humans, it is morally wrong to test on humans, and animals have the same diseases as humans Humans and the animals we test on have similar structures as us and shorter life spans so it is a better controlled experiment to see if the product we are testing is safe and available to use on humans.
Animal testing has become increasingly controversial since its advent, dating back 150 years (Understanding Animal Research 1). While testing vaccines and drugs on animals has been a successful technique for scientists for decades, it may be seen as cruel and immoral by some because it involves harming and even killing over 100 million animals every year (Collins 1). However, this technique has prevented many dangerous drugs from reaching the public and proved to successfully change the lives of many struggling with diseases that were once thought to be incurable. Animal testing seems inhumane at times, but it has contributed to the development of many life saving treatments.
Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.
Introduction Testing on animals has been a hotly contested issue for hundreds of years. Every year a colossal number of animals are used for testing and most of them die due to ill treatment and stressful conditions. On that account, experimenting on animals used to develop new medicine should be reduced or prohibited, because it is ethically wrong and unreliable. On top of that there are methods that substitute the testing on animals Body History of animals experiments in brief The animal testing has a long history.
Iza Iglesias and Lorna Collier both discuss their viewpoints on animal testing and provides evidence to support their argument. In the article, “ 8 million signatures needed in fight against animal testing”, Iglesias argues against animal testing while Collier defends it in her article titled, “Defending animal
There is empirical evidence showing that animal “models” are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research, therefore medical experimentation on humans is more effective in clinical trials toward the discovery of cures for human diseases the medical experimentation on animals. When talking about testing on animals and not humans, the reality stands in the way of realizing that regulatory authorities are demanding to test on at least two different animal species before a drug is entered human trials. Even with today's testing standards, the scientists who found the morning sickness drug, would not likely have detected its crippling effects when they tested on rats and mice because humans are not two-pound
There have been numerous recorded examples of drugs that have worked on animals, but then proceeded to not work on humans. Animal testing is misleading, “94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials” (Nine). Not only does this prove that animal testing is ultimately ineffective, but it also shows how the deceiving results could potentially cause harm to humans. For example, in the 1950s a sleeping pill called thalidomide was commercially released as it was proved to be effective on animals. However, the pill went on to cause more than 10,000 babies to be born with birth defects (Science).
A very good example of why we need to test on animals is the Thalidomide Disaster. In the 1950s-60s The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ran tests to determine if it was safe to use. The Thalidomide drug was given out to pregnant women to help cure morning sickness. Instead of helping, it killed many babies, and approximately 15,000 babies were born with limb defects. This drug was tested on animals, but all the necessary test were not ran to insure the safety of consumer.
According to crueltyfreeinternational.org, “90% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests - whether on safety grounds or because they do not work.” This means that the majority of the results that scientists get are useless. These results only work on animals and not humans, in which the tests were meant for. It is completely and utterly useless to test animals for the benefit of humans, if the conclusions that scientists get do not benefit humans.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.