Although the cultures of the Mesopotamians and the Indians differ greatly, both Gilgamesh and Rama resemble each other significantly as well as overcome similar difficulties in order to be deemed heroic, which makes it seem that, even though these two civilizations were separated geographically, the concept of heroism seemed to be ubiquitous. Firstly, in both epics, the hero’s journeys were heavily influenced by their religions. In Rama’s case, his journey is based entirely upon the divine belief of Dharma, and after he defeats Ravana, it is stated that his Dharma is “fulfilled” (Valmiki 94). Additionally, Gilgamesh’s journey was based upon the actions of God against his friend Enkidu. When Shamash, Enlil, and Anu caused Enkidu to be “stricken with sickness” (Gilgamesh 19) and ultimately killed him, this inspired Gilgamesh to start his journey to find immortality. …show more content…
For example, in The Ramayana, Rama’s experience, self-control, and kindness characterize him as wise; the fact that he overcomes all odds to become the king of Ayodhya, which makes him powerful; and his constant trust in the Gods and reverence to religious ceremonies makes him very respectful to the Gods from the perspective of Indian culture. Furthermore, in The Epic of Gilgamesh, Gilgamesh’s experiences from his journey as well as the positive character traits he learned make him “wise” (Gilgamesh 2); he became the greatest king that Uruk ever knew, which makes him powerful; and he continually prayed to the Gods, especially Shamash, which means that he respects the Gods. On the contrary, the Indian culture seems to portray their hero, Rama, as much more perfect, in character traits, than the Mesopotamians. For example, while Gilgamesh’s “lust leaves no virgin to her lover” (Gilgamesh 2), Rama resembles perfect loyalty to his wife, Sita, even though they are separated for the majority of the