The rape cases have been considered and approached differently in different counties. Most of the country judge these assaults depending to their cultural believe and the national laws. Although it is true to say that the prosecutors are handling this offences according to the law, but it is also true to say that there cultural believe also take part in decision-making. Different countries have different ethnic communities, the religion and the law. These religions have different takes in these matters; this is from the biblical, Quran and the constitutional law point of view, they all have different opinions of the right punishments that the offenders should be subjected to. Various surveys have been done across the world, of these surveys, …show more content…
With this kind of notion in case of the acquaintance rape, the victim finds it difficult to report. This lowers the bar of reported cases of rape offences in countries, showing a reduction in rape case when in actual sense it’s the other way round. The second myth states that in case the victim showed or invited the sexual relationship to the offender like a woman dressing provocative too much drinking and wrong signals, these are considered minor offence sand the victim will be considered as partially responsible for the offence. The last myth is the delay to report the assault, which the juries consider that as a false accusation due to some reason like fantasy and boredom. With these kinds of perspectives, the judge and the juries execute their judgment based in not only the law but also the myths and the in that country. This is where the justice to the victim lies to the hands of the expert of sexual offence. The way the experts present their findings determine the decision made by the jury. Most country uses these means to pin out the truth and assist in verdict to the