ipl-logo

Ratifying The Constitution: Patrick Henry And George Mason

1399 Words6 Pages

1.
The words are those of speeches given by Patrick Henry and George Mason, two influential critics of the Constitution, during the 1788 Virginia Convention in Richmond, but someone else, presumably a secretary, recorded the document. The Virginia Convention was one of 13 held in each state to ratify the new Constitution. This convention was seen as particularly important, for Virginia’s affirmative was expected to become the last needed to officially ratify the Constitution as well as help convince the rest of the states to ratify (Shi and Mayer, 151).
Patrick Henry and George Mason both, however, argued against ratification with the rest of the Anti-Federalists. Former Virginia governor Henry had always disapproved of the constitution out …show more content…

He believes that there is no need for a new constitution, explaining that “a general peace and tranquility” reined over the country until the idea of the Constitution (Shi and Mayer 152). In another point, Henry expresses how America’s alliances will other nations will be destroyed; while America’s treaties were formed by all thirteen states, only nine will be part of the nation if the constitution is ratified. This change, according to Henry, will nullify these alliances. Henry then touches upon a point he makes many times; a strong, central federal government will take away the rights of the people in a way that a confederation would not. State governments, he argues, are better at representing their own people (Shi and Mayer 152). He also declares that the focus of a government should not be on wealth or power but on liberty, something Henry believes should be “the direct end of your government” (Shi and Mayer, 154-155). One lost right Henry focuses on is the ability to change the government; no one, according to him, will be able to stand up to and change the government proposed, able to wield unlimited power. According to Henry, there are no checks or balances on the federal government’s power under this new doctrine, and rather than focus on the liberty and happiness of its citizens, the nation will focus on becoming an empire through conquest. Henry also touches upon the lack of a Bill of Rights; while the states were given explicit rights in the Articles of Confederation, the people are given none explicitly in the Constitution, leaving all power implicitly to the federal government. He believes that the inclusion of a Bill of Rights would stop a dispute from occurring (Shi and Mayer 155-157). Henry’s final subject is slavery. While he himself admits to disliking it, he insists upon its necessity, expressing how emancipation would end the “peace and

Show More
Related
598 Words | 3 Pages

Answer: Massachusetts farmers opposed the Constitution in light of the fact that they felt it ensured exchange more than horticulture, the Federalist Papers were distributed there to pick up backing for it. Virginia and New York would not ratify until the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. In light of the opposition, John Hancock at the Massachusetts ratifying tradition suggested that a bill of rights be included as the first gathering of amendments to the Constitution. Ratification in Massachusetts and pretty much all whatever remains of the uncommitted states relied on upon the comprehension that receiving a bill of rights would be the new government's first request of business. There were the opposition which was made out of assorted

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

In Patrick Henry’s, Virginia Convention, he talked about how the people needed to fight back against the British. And in Benjamin Franklin’s, the speech he gave at the Constitutional Convention, talked about how the Articles of Confederation had some problems, and if they were to fix them that the people would most likely have better lives. But there are always differences and similarities. And in these speeches there are differences and similarities. But Patrick and Ben both explained what the people could do and what they shouldn’t do.

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

If there be sufficient virtue and intelligence in the community, it will be exercised in the selection of these men. So that we do not depend on their virtue, or put confidence in our rulers, but in the people who are to choose them.” Among other prominent Federalists were John Marshall, William Overton Callis and George Wythe who also served in the Rules Committee at the Constitutional Convention. Delegates of the Virginia Ratifying Convention also relied on the opinions of George Washington who kept the conversation going through the letters as he was not at the

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

George Mason and Patrick Henry had valid arguments and provided multiple points to support their rejection of the U.S. Constitution. George Mason and Patrick Henry were Anti-Federalist, a political party at the time which argued against the formation of a strong central government. Both Mason and Henry opposed the Constitution because they felt the Constitution would be similar to the British monarchy which had a powerful leader which would enforce unfair laws as well as taxes amongst the state governments and the people in them. George Mason main argument against the Constitution was the creation of a National government which would be strong enough to destroy state governments which represented the people and their interest.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Henry continues by emotionally describing how he is ready to endure any pain that will come his way from finally learning the truth. He feels he is ready to stand up and be change that must come from the colonies, despite any despair he might face. 2. “There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged!

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

1. Short-response prompt (15 points) Read the following excerpt from Patrick Henry's speech to the Convention of Delegates in Virginia (1775): It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, peace, peace — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution had to be ratified by 9 states in order to become America’s official government. In the states were supporters of the Constitution and opposers. Federalists were people that wanted the Constitution to be ratified and those

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

1). Henry claims there is only two ways: it is either fighting or slavery/British rule. This is an appeal to pathos because he attempts to use it to create anger and purposely upset them with the idea of slavery. This idea is carried on further in the paragraph, "Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received?" (par. 3).

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

-George Mason was an influential American patriot and a framer of the Constituion. He attended the Constitution Convention and helped draft the final product, adding his strong opinions and ideas. He didn’t actually sign it but his participation was crucial. As well, he was one of the main supporters of the Bill of Rights. -This site is connected to what we have learned in class because it honors one of the framers of the Constituion, George Mason.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison, founding father and fourth president of United States wrote the federalists paper number 10 in favor of the constitution. He believes that constitution is the only way to keep balance and control any problem this country faces. He uses faction as an example and talks about how it can cause problems but most importantly how to deal with the problems. He defines faction as groups of people who came together to promote their own interests and opinions. He said that these groups take advantage of the public and violate their rights.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

For example, Henry says "I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery..." The thoughts and emotions connected with the word slavery bring many things to mind. Like do you want to be under "slavery" for Britain forever to never be free or fight to have

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Drawing upon his established ethos, Henry alludes to the Bible, implying that if the Convention ignored him they would face destruction. Henry develops this idea of destruction throughout his speech, creating an emotional sense of fear and urgency around his argument with words such as “snare,” “war and subjugation,” “chains,” and “tyrannical.” Despite this heavy pathos throughout his speech, Henry also incudes logic, speaking of how he must judge the future by the past, and for that reason can only find proof that Britain will continue to mistreat the Colonies. He additionally utilizes logos through recounting all the acts they have tried so far, which had all been in vain, as well as through a series of “if… then” statements, such as “if we wish to be free… [then] we must

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

Henry claims “Give me liberty or give me death!” In this statement Henry symbolizes such a great extent of passion towards the fight for independence through that quote. He also states “What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased and slavery?”

Read More

More about Ratifying The Constitution: Patrick Henry And George Mason

Related Topics

Open Document