Reaction: The Singer Solution To World Poverty
302 Words2 Pages
Instructor: Laurie Loveland
Seminar in Education Inquiry (HUM-2010-VU04)
February 20, 2017
Reaction: The Singer Solution to World Poverty
In the essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Peter Singer attempt to address the weakness in society efforts toward world hunger and poverty. Peter singer argue that people should donate 100% of their non-essential income to overseas aid organization. I agree with him and his way of writing essay help me to be there with him, also convince me to donate.
This was a particularly interesting essay to read and get the ideas about poverty and alo the solution to it. While reading I felt like what if that homeless boy was me and there was Dora around me. But, “donated to one of a number
Related
1471 Words | 6 Pages
Please help the children of this third world country by donating just one dollar a day. You can’t turn on the television without seeing a commercial asking you to donate to help feed the impoverished or to supply much needed medicine. In the article, “What Should a Billionaire Give – and What Should You?” the author attempts to make a point of giving money to charitable organizations, much like these commercials. Peter Singer’s article dives into the realm of philanthropy in order to aid the impoverished by appealing to logic through reasoning and statistics, and emotion by using examples throughout the writing.
925 Words | 4 Pages
By just reading the title, readers are able to think differently. Then while reading her essay, readers are able to see why she tilted it that, and can begin to see the subject in a whole new perspective. When one hears that a person is homeless, they may think it is that persons fault. Many people feel that people are homeless because they are alcoholics, druggies,
302 Words | 2 Pages
The Singer Solution to World Poverty” written by Peter Singer. In the essay that Peter Singer wrote has a main point which is to give solution to the world poverty and how to deal with with the situation to end it. The article narrates that the philosophy Peter Singer demonstrate about the world poverty.
557 Words | 3 Pages
Peter Singer argues that prosperous people should donate their excess money to the overseas aid groups. When saying this, he believes Americans should stop spending their money on luxuries such as a TV, a computer, a car, and videogames. Instead of spending money on items such as that, he thought we should start sending money to those who are starving in other countries and need our help. There are pros and cons to Singer’s argument and both can be greatly supported.
1234 Words | 5 Pages
Millions of people are hungry and thousands of individuals die of starvation each day. Meanwhile, the average American spends a portion of their income on luxuries, such as televisions to imported cars. In the article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer stresses that Americans should donate all of their income that is not needed for necessities to overseas charities and aid organizations in order to resolve world poverty. However, his straightforward proposition to end world poverty lays on a controversial topic that questions one’s morals and rights.
283 Words | 2 Pages
The philosophical issue that we have considered since the Mid-Term that has interested me the most was Global Poverty. Singer’s moral principle “If is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. I agree with this fully because everybody should be willing to help others when they are suffering without having to thinking about it. I just really understood where Peter Singer was coming from. The example he made about the toddler flailing in the pond and if I would get out of my car to help the child I will be late for work.
1292 Words | 6 Pages
Singer is no stranger to writing moral arguments, having written many different books and articles in the past on a wide range of ethical debates. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” originally printed in the New York Times in the fall of 1999 just before Singer began to work at Princeton University, is intended for the common man, a middle-class citizen who makes average wages and reads popular newspapers. As Singer is a professor of ethics, the article is structured around the
1805 Words | 8 Pages
In this paper I will be arguing against Peter Singer’s views on poverty, which he expresses in his paper “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Singer argues that all people with wealth surplus to their essential needs are morally obligated to prevent the suffering of those in dire situations. I will argue that you can not hold people morally obligated to prevent the suffering of others, and that people can only be held morally obligated to prevent suffering that they themselves caused. To begin, we will look at Singers beliefs and arguments regarding poverty and the responsibility of people to help those in need. Singer’s first arguments revolves around a girl named Dora, who is a retired schoolteacher, who is barely making a living writing
2133 Words | 9 Pages
Ethics Paper Today there are multiple countries struggling with lack of food due to various reasons such as natural disasters, manmade disasters, government policies and individuals actions. In Peter Singer’s article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” we see him focusing on all these aspects and the negative impacts they portray on those in desperate need (Singer, 1972, 229). Singer does this with a utilitarian approach which means he looks at situations as either right or wrong solely on the outcome of choosing one thing over another(Schweickart, 2008, 473). This, therefore, takes into account the interests of others.
576 Words | 3 Pages
“The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is too drastic to be implemented, economically speaking, however another solution to world poverty would prove to be more
3128 Words | 13 Pages
Philip Manning 12504697 Q) Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. There can be no doubt that Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ is unrealistic, unfair and not sustainable. Singer’s arguments are valid arguments but not sound. In order to get a clear and balanced view of my arguments which disprove the Singer article, it is first necessary to examine and lay out the main aspects of Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My arguments against Singer’s claims shall then be detailed and examined in depth.
665 Words | 3 Pages
His essay comes with a lot of realizations and really puts into perspective the necessary changes within us and our community that need to be
820 Words | 4 Pages
In one circumstance, we may feel the need to give to those who are poor to keep them from getting in our personal space; and in other circumstances we feel that we give to others out of the kindness of our heart. I completely agree with Ascher and her views on compassion, because I have been in similar situation where I have questioned why people give money, and whether they give with a whole heart or out of necessity. Furthermore, this essay can teach us plenty of lessons that can be utilized throughout our lives so we can teach others and make them aware of the need to be more
705 Words | 3 Pages
In Peter Singer’s article entitled ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, he discusses the topic of poverty in Bangladesh and goes on to talk about its causes and the ways in which it can be somewhat eliminated in Bangladesh. Singer puts forth a statement stating that if there is a way in which we can avoid a negative outcome in a situation, without sacrificing anything of similar moral value, then we are obligated to do just that. Another point he mentions is that people would feel less obligated to give money to a person in need if they were living in an area far away from that individual as opposed to being within the proximity of that person. In addition, Singer also believes that with the transportation methods at one’s disposal in this
772 Words | 4 Pages
Your book also shows that the idioms we never payed attention to as children really is the foundation and is the fundamental truth about life. Living in New York I see many homeless people begging for money. They may have animals they care for or they might be by themselves men and women. Even Though Maurice wasn’t homeless, he acted and was treated like he was homeless. All my time
More about Reaction: The Singer Solution To World Poverty
What Should A Billionaire Give Peter Singer Summary
1471 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of Unemployed And Working Hard By Simon Wykoff
925 Words | 4 PagesPeter Singer Solution To World Poverty
302 Words | 2 PagesPeter Singer's Arguments For Helping Overseas Aid Groups
557 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty By Peter Singer
1234 Words | 5 PagesPeter Singer's Argument Essay: Global Poverty
283 Words | 2 PagesSinger Solution To World Poverty Argument
1292 Words | 6 PagesThe Singer Solution To World Poverty Analysis
1805 Words | 8 PagesPeter Singer Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis
2133 Words | 9 PagesPros And Cons Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty
576 Words | 3 PagesPeter Singer's Argument In Famine, Affluence And Morality
3128 Words | 13 PagesHow Does Twain Use Satire In The Lowest Animal
665 Words | 3 PagesBarbara Lazear Ascher's 'On Compassion'
820 Words | 4 PagesFamine Affluence And Morality Peter Singer Analysis
705 Words | 3 PagesThe Invisible Thread Personal Response
772 Words | 4 Pages