ipl-logo

Reasons For The Compromise Of 1850

485 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Describe the compromise of 1850 essay

The Civil War also known as “ The War Between the States” was one of the many wars that changed the United States for the greater good. The war went on for about four years.There were tremendous amount of soldiers and people dead or either wounded. The war occurred due to the different opinions of slavery resulting in the separation of the north and south states, farming, and failing compromises. The differences between the North and South is one of the many attributes to the uprising of the Civil War. In the North there were very few slaves but on the other hand the South had many slaves. The South had a big farming economy and work needed to be done on those plantations, it led to slavery. The South was very dependent on slaves to do work on the plantations like picking cotton. Meanwhile, in the North the didn’t need to use slaves because they had moved away from the farming business. Meaning that the North didn’t really need slaves for anything while the South needed slaves to do their hard labor on the plantations. …show more content…

The Compromise of 1850 was a compromise that was an attempt to prevent a catastrophe to happen between the North and the South. California had just applied to becoming. Most of the Southerners believed that since majority of California was below that 36 30’ parallel that it should be a slave state. Due to many of the states wanting to secede from the nation then after Stephen Douglas came up with the compromise.Now there would be 16 free states and 15 slave states and the new territories New Mexico and Utah would then be able to decide whether or not they wanted to be a free or slave state.Though Washington D.C. had abolished slavery. Within that Compromise was a Fugitive Slave Act that stated that prohibited you to return any runaway slaves back to their owner and if not it would result in some type of

Show More
Related
738 Words | 3 Pages

The South became a crop-based society that depended on the cheap labor of slaves. The North became a manufacturing and trading society that had saw slaves as helpful, but not absolutely crucial. Further into the future, this difference would drastically affect the Americas, through racial tension and ethical dilemmas. It would become a huge part of the civil war’s cause, a war that irrefutably shaped today’s world. All of these implications arose simply from the fact that the Northern colonies adapted to their environment in a way that did not require workers whereas the South adapted differently, demanding slave

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an agreement that was made to defuse the crisis over slavery. Thus the issue of slavery in fact had the biggest impact that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.” Henry Clay was the one who introduced The Compromise of 1850 into Congress. The Compromise of 1850 was the an agreement that attempted to defuse the crisis of slavery. California asked and was granted permission to go into the Union as a free state.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

The Breakdown of the Compromise of 1850 After the Mexican war, the balance of the slave and free states was being tested by the new state of California. If California was admitted as a free state, the southerners would succeed, while the northerners would revolt against the admittance of California as a slave state. The reasons for this reaction by the North and the South was because of slavery, and of the Senate’s balance. The main reason why the admittance of California was so heavily weighed, was because of the balance in the Senate. Since the North had a greater population, they had control over the House of Representatives, while the balance in the Senate was perfectly equal.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the importance of slavery to its economy, the south held very different ideals than the north. For instance, during the Civil War, the North's Emancipation

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Though it was to maintain peace, it only brought trouble. The Compromise of 1850 made it so that the fugitive slave act was in motion and abolished the slave trade in Washington, D.C. This compromise also made California a slave-free state. In 1854, the Missouri compromise was set aside and declared unconstitutional.

Read More
1723 Words | 7 Pages

The Civil War, which began in 1861, had the American states divided into 2 parts, and pitted against one another in the name of slavery. Accounts of slavery have viewed the situation as “wicked, cruel, and unjust” (John Brown). However, this view, at the time, was controversial at best, due to the overwhelming fact that the south was in favor of slavery, and the north was appalled by tit. Slavery was their main source of labor in their area that relied on agriculture for production and sustaining financial wealth. The north had mostly factories and industries, and did not require as much manual labor, hence the idea of opposition at the time.

Read More
161 Words | 1 Pages

The crisis arose from the request of the territory of California On December 3, 1849 , the territory of California asked to join the Union with a constitution that did not allow slavery. The question of slavery being extended into other areas made this a difficult situation because the question was never resolved from the start. In 1850 , with the support of a couple senators , Henry Clay suggested another compromise. California would be allowed to join the Union as a free state, and the rest of the land that was taken from Mexico would be divided up and slavery status would be concluded by each as they would determine slavery by having its people to decide for themselves.

Read More
246 Words | 1 Pages

Once again, American politicians were forced to revisit the issue of slavery and its expansion west when the United States gained vast tracts of land in the west after the end of the Mexican-American War. The issue of slavery, which had not been at the forefront of national politics, once again came to great prominence. Political factions divided and some threatened that their states would leave the Union if President Taylor brought California and New Mexico into the Union without going through the territorial phase (Shi and Tindall p. 501). As a result, the Compromise of 1850 was formed by the great compromiser Henry Clay, which ensured that both the North and South’s interests remained intact. In short, the Compromise guaranteed that California

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

If the slaves missed a few days working on the plantation because of illness or what the case maybe that resulted in revenue loss. Whereas the North had many other alternatives to making revenue, such as mills and other manufacturing companies; the South basically depending on slaves to have income and to support their

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

In the south, they were focused on agriculture. They were reliant on the production of cotton and required many slaves to make that happen. The north on the other hand, was more focused on industrialization and urbanization.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

When California petitioned to enter the union there was a bit of uproar. There were many difference of views on whether California should be a slave state or a free state. The south wanted California to be slave and the north wanted the opposite. January 29, 1850, Henry Clay (great compromiser, Missouri compromise) comes along and brings up the idea of a Compromise between the states. The main people that came together to go over and debate this compromise included Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, Massachusetts senator John C.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was a serial publication of laws that attempted to change The territorial and slavery disagreements arising from the Mexican-American War from 1846 to 1848. The five laws, legal philosophy, balanced the interests of the slave states of the South. California turned into a free state. The Texas Lone-Star State received financial help for claiming the lands of the west of the Rio Grande in what is now known as the territory of New Mexico also including what is now known as Arizona and Utah were organized without any specific prohibition of slavery. The slave trade, but not slavery itself was abolished in Washington, D.C.; and the Fugitive Slave law was passed, requiring all U.S. citizens to help in the return of all runaway

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

In exchange for slavery in the territories, the Compromise included the Fugitive Slave Act which gave an official mandate to capture fugitive slaves fleeing to the north. Before this act, most in the north simply let the slaves walk free after reaching free territory, even though legally they should be returned. This mandate set up a series of commissioners to decide whether any suspected fugitives were free or run-aways. They also received twice the money for decided they were a slave then free. This easily corrupt system angered many northerners as free blacks in northern territories were being kidnapped and send back south.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

These actions, although they solved the problem regarding California 's status as a free or slave state, did not provide any long-term, fundamental principle for future decisions on the sectional balance of new territories. The Compromise of 1850 additionally permitted

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was meant to solve problems, but instead caused the division between the North and South to be worse. It left the definition of popular sovereignty vague, so the south thought they could not ban slavery, but the north wanted the people of the area to decide if they should have slavery or not. The Fugitive Slave Act helped the owners return their slave property from any state, even free states by proving ownership of the slave. It also states that one could be arrested if they hid a slave, both of which angered the north.

Read More

More about Reasons For The Compromise Of 1850

Open Document