Reasons For The Flaws Under The Articles Of Confederation

1149 Words5 Pages

In 1777, after the American Revolution had ended, the new United States of America adopted the Articles of Confederation as the new central government. The Articles made the government weak, powerless, and vulnerable out of fear for tyranny. This system had many flaws and created a lack of unity between the states. As a result, the Constitution of the United States was developed in 1789 to solve many of the problems that arose from the Articles. This new system re-constructed the government into three branches and created a system of checks and balances to prevent the government from becoming corrupt. The Constitution revised the government under the Articles of Confederation to create a more united and well oiled government. The Articles …show more content…

By creating a federal court system, headed by the Supreme Court, and controversy could easily be settled. Under the Articles, if a crime was committed, it would be tried in the state committed. This created a lot of bias especially if the accused person was from out of state. The Constitution stated that any crimes committed in a different states than the person in question was from would be handled by the Supreme Court to eliminate any bias. Another problem that was solved with the federal court system was the ability to appeal the court. Under the Articles, if the first court found the accused guilty they were designated as guilty. The new Judicial branch made it so that the accused could appeal the court and receive a new hearing as many times as they would like. However, one the case got to the Supreme Court, whatever their ruling was is the final decision. This gave the people the right to a fair trial. That way, if they were innocent but deemed guilty, they could appeal and have the chance to be found innocent. Lastly, the Judicial branch was given the power of Judicial Review under the Constitution. This gave the branch the power to rule the actions of the Legislative and Executive branches as unjust and unconstitutional. This helped to prevent one branch from abusing the power that they had. If any actions were deemed as unconstitutional, it would stop immediately and be revised until it was seen as constitutional and acceptable by the Judicial