Recognising And Addressing Linguistic Bias In Jury Trial

1219 Words5 Pages

Linguistic bias can have a significant impact on legal outcomes in jury trials. Valerie Fridland's argument highlights the importance of recognising and addressing linguistic bias in the judicial system to ensure fairness and equal treatment. This essay examines the ways the judicial system can prevent potential linguistic bias from influencing court outcomes.According to Valerie Fridland, recognizing and eliminating potential language bias is essential to guaranteeing fair and reasonable judicial proceedings. She contends that prejudice toward African-American English speakers can influence the results of jury trials. This essay argues that the judicial system may address linguistic prejudice by recognizing linguistic diversity, offering education …show more content…

According to Stevens and Stovall, "Students can acquire the knowledge and abilities to detect and oppose discrimination based on language by critically evaluating language and its function in society." This highlights the importance of critical thinking and analysis when it comes to language use, especially in the legal system. Valerie Fridland also emphasizes the need for critical scrutiny and awareness of language use in legal circumstances, stating that "a potential cure to prevent linguistic bias from influencing legal results is to encourage critical scrutiny and awareness of language use in legal circumstances." This suggests that language use can have a significant impact on legal outcomes and that it is important to be mindful of this when communicating in legal contexts.In order to combat language discrimination and bias, it is important to appreciate and embrace linguistic variety. Both Stevens, Stovall, and Fridland emphasize the need for awareness and education in fighting language-based prejudices and biases. By developing an understanding of how language is used to perpetuate discrimination, individuals can work towards creating a more just and fair society. Furthermore, critical literacy can help students challenge language use in legal situations. By analyzing the language used in legal documents and proceedings, students can identify instances of bias or discrimination and work to address these issues. This approach can be especially effective in cases where language use has a direct impact on legal