Red Scare And Mccarthy Trials In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

1284 Words6 Pages

Compare and contrast the Red Scare and the McCarthy trials to the situation in The Crucible; contrast Deputy Governor Danforth with Senator Joseph McCarthy. Could this type of hysteria happen today? Discuss. Response: Miller composed The Crucible to demonstrate the impacts of mass mania, relative to that of the Red Scare, and to endeavor and help foresee it later on. In the midst of the Red Scare, people were being charged of espionage, communism, and contempt of the court. Various of these people absolutely guiltless. Predictable mistakes had a gigantic influence in the feelings of the faulted. If you denied you had communist ties, the courts considered it to be a lie concealing reality that you are a communist. In a couple of cases, it was …show more content…

In the play, The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrays John Proctor, the protagonist, as a tragic hero who has a major flaw and lust for Abigail, his teenage house servant. Because of a paranoid fear of being banished in a town where notoriety assumes such a vast part in their day by day lives, Proctor at first tries to conceal his wrongdoing of infidelity, yet his issue with Abigail triggers a noteworthy arrangement of occasions in Salem, where basic, problematic allegations at that point raise to a far bigger issue, “Abby...you mean to cry out still others?” “If I live, if I am not murdered, I surely will, until the last hypocrite is dead” (Miller …show more content…

Since Abigail’s modern quality (of being misled and crazy) is as it were displayed in this cut scene, I think that may be Arthur Miller left the scene out so he could make a character whose infamous acts were exclusively vindictive, and not a side impact of being crazy. Clearly, Abigail was not implied to turn out crazy; I think Arthur Miller needed to show his readers what could happen when the corrupt seize control. This could only happen if Abigail were a persuasive person with her mind. This way, the ruin of man could not be faulted on craziness, but on man’s manipulative, misleading behavior. “Additionally, when the girls are treated as ‘officials of the court’ with the power to charge and condemn, the thrill in arousing hysteria and anxiety in others, combined with the power to condemn, proves too seductive for a young girl to ignore.”— "Sheffield Theatres Education Resource." Welcome to Sheffield Theatres Checking Plugin. 26 Jan. 2009.) This quote describes Abigail and the other girls have let the lure of newfound power control them. This much is evident without the omitted scene. So perhaps the play is better off without the second scene in Act II. Abigail’s obsession with power is enough for the reader to think about without throwing the question of her insanity into the