Religion Based Court System In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

470 Words2 Pages

Religion based court systems often lead to downfalls within a community. In addition, religion based courts also can lead to cruelty within a community. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller uses characters to show human cruelty in the name of righteousness can be used as a tool for their own interest. For example, Reverend Parris and Judge Danforth both used God in order to harm others. This is also used in determining, and eventually kills Giles Corey. Reverend Parris used religion in order to protect his family and his own reputation. When Abigail was accused of witchcraft, she blamed Tituba for what happened to Betty. Reverend Parris would believe Abigail, troubled and insane, of being under Tituba’s command. Parris would then use his power to threaten Tituba. “You will confess yourself or I will take you out and whip you to your death, Tituba!” (161), Parris commanded. To explain, Parris uses his power of the religion based court in order to threaten and whip her. Parris would go to the extent of whipping someone just to keep up his “good” reputation. …show more content…

Hale and Parris wanted the trials to end, Hale notices that the trials are getting out of hand, and Parris gets threats from the townspeople. However Danforth, authoritative and cruel, decides that the trials should continue. He even uses religion to persuade the men to continue the trials. “...Now draw yourselves up like men and help me, as you are bound by heaven to do…”(205), he demands. In other words Danforth argues, if these men don’t continue the trials with him, they'll be sinners. In the same way as Reverend Parris, Judge Danforth only refuses for the trials to stop because he wants to maintain a “holy”