ipl-logo

Rene Descartes Myth Of Sisyphus

962 Words4 Pages

A. Introduction to Descartes’ ‘I’ “If one could only say just once: 'this is clear', all would be saved” Albert Camus, Myth of Sisyphus Questioning of any sort of an “a priori” and the rise of new existentialist movements clearly have their roots back to Descartes’skepticism as seen in the quote above from Myth of Sisyphus. The restless idea of doubting every concept Descartes builds in his first meditation develops more and more throughout ages to become a new starting point to redescribe certain values such as ethics, God, freedom etc. which were to be accepted by people as basics. Along with these concepts, the skeptic goes even further to question the existence of the self which is the subject of any experience for a ‘thinking …show more content…

(Descartes, 6) Having this particular purpose, Descartes’ approach could be criticized as a deviation from the skeptic view which he had started his examination with. According to Hegel, skepticism would be both the aim and the product of itself at the same time and a skeptic would be satisfied when he achieves to put every notion into doubt.(Hegel) This however, was not Descartes’ intention in his Meditations on First Philosophy. He used skepticism as a tool to arrive at specific unconditioned conclusions rather than making it a destination point. After demanding the refusal of every knowledge and belief in the first meditation, Descartes acknowledges the absolute existence of a being in the second meditation: the ‘I’. The source of this crack in skeptic view is defined as the thinking of the self, in other words, …show more content…

While defining the essence of the self, Descartes leaves out the sensual experiences as well as any material substance. When he points out to a consciousness that has its own unity, he also defines it as an eternal substance independent from the body and bodily received knowledge. In the first meditation, Descartes uses dreams as examples of deceived sensual information and further claims that the world we define as reality could also be a dream or any false imagery. As he states from the very beginning, any knowledge that cannot be absolutely certain has to be thought as falsity for Descartes, so the existence of the outer world becomes an

Show More
Related
723 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes finishes up this Meditation with some more ethics about the self. Information of the self, or psyche, is more particular and sure than knowledge of the body. The technique for uncertainty in the First Meditation seemed to debilitate all information, yet in the Second Meditation Descartes discovers something that cannot be questioned. I think each of us must affirm our own particular presence and set up the means of our own

Read More
1656 Words | 7 Pages

Juliet Arowosaye UCOR 132: Basic Philosophical Questions Meditations on First Philosophy; Descartes’ Doubts and Resolutions In Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes, the meditator presents the possibility that everything he, and all humans, have known and seen could be false. He struggles to find any reason to not doubt that our senses have just been deceiving us our whole lives. Thus, he reaches the conclusion that everything we have seen and known, as well as our existence, must be called into doubt. Descartes attempts to unravel the meditator’s mentality by presenting ways in which we are possibly being deceived.

Read More
1654 Words | 7 Pages

However, Descartes is indeed certain of the fact that he is a thinking being, and that he exists. As a result of this argument, Descartes makes a conclusion that the things he perceives clearly and distinctly cannot be false, and are therefore true (Blanchette). This clear and distinct perception is an important component to the argument that Descartes makes in his fifth meditation for the existence of God. This paper explains Descartes ' proof of God 's existence from Descartes ' fifth meditation, Pierre Gassendi 's objection to this proof, and then offers the paper 's author 's opinion on both the proof and objection.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

Read More
3649 Words | 15 Pages

Descartes differentiates himself from other skeptics since he only doubts to only rebuild all of his beliefs in absolute certainty — thereby removing the skeptic. ! We might call Descartes skepticism a kind of “hyperbolic” kind of skepticism; even though he knows that not all his beliefs are not necessarily false, he assumes that they all are. We might ask, why does Descartes do this? To inaugurate what we discussed earlier, Descartes says: !

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will deliver a reconstruction of Descartes’ Cogito Argument and my reasoning to validate it as indubitable. I will do so by justifying my interpretations through valid arguments and claim, by showcasing examples with reasoning. Rene Descartes is a French Philosopher of the 17th century, who formulated the philosophical Cogito argument by the name of ‘cogito ergo sum,’ also known as “I think, therefore, I am.” Rene was a skeptic philosopher amongst many scholastic philosophers of his time. To interpret his cogito argument as indubitable and whether it could serve as a foundational belief, he took a skeptical approach towards the relations between thoughts and existence.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes is trying to establish firm foundations for knowledge; in doing so he adopts ‘The Method of Doubt’ where he tests knowledge by subjecting them to sceptical arguments. There are three main arguments considered by Descartes in the First Meditation, ‘The Argument from Sensory Error’, ‘The Argument from Dreaming’, and ‘The Argument from the Possibility of a Deceitful God’. In Descartes’ ‘Argument from Sensory Error’, he says “Whatever I have accepted until now as most true has come to me through my sense. But occasionally I have found that they have deceived me, and it is unwise to trust completely those who have deceived us even once”.

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In the sixth meditation, Descartes postulates that there exists a fundamental difference in the natures of both mind and body which necessitates that they be considered as separate and distinct entities, rather than one stemming from the other or vice versa. This essay will endeavour to provide a critical objection to Descartes’ conception of the nature of mind and body and will then further commit to elucidating a suitably Cartesian-esque response to the same objection. (Descartes,1641) In the sixth meditation Descartes approaches this point of dualism between mind and matter, which would become a famous axiom in his body of philosophical work, in numerous ways. To wit Descartes postulates that he has clear and distinct perceptions of both

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes’ argues that God’s perfect existence can be proven through humankind’s imperfection. Descartes asserts that whenever he is made aware of his own existent imperfections, such as his doubtfulness and dependency, he comes to the conclusion that a perfect being, a God, exists (Mediation Four, 53, pg.81). According to Descartes, “this conclusion is so obvious that I am confident that the human mind can know nothing more evident or more certain (Meditation Four, 53, pg.81).” While Descartes firmly maintains the idea that doubt can cast a shadow over the truth, thus making it difficult to find, he also argues that the existence of human doubt, as well as deception and error, could lead someone towards the truth. Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy is ultimately a treatise where the existence of doubt

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

The idea that if one can comprehend something in a dream, it therefore must exist in real life. The fact of this is that we know no positive transition between our dream state and the state of reality, and since dreams are so similar to reality, one can never tell when they are truly dreaming. Descartes demonstrates this idea with his own experiences, “How often, asleep at night, am I convinced of just such familiar events-that I am here in my dressing-gown, sitting by the fire – when in fact I am lying undressed in bed! Yet at the moment my eyes are certainly awake” (Descartes 145). By using simple experiences like these Descartes is able to emphasize that when a person is dreaming, they do not usually know they are dreaming, and the sensations they experience are as real as if they were awake.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Descartes said, “Several years have now elapsed since I first became aware that I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true, and that consequently what I afterward based on such principles was highly doubtful. ”(1) After analyzing my fellow classmates’ thoughts on Descartes’ first and second meditation, I came to the conclusion that Descartes no longer had faith in what he learned throughout his entire life. Descartes radicalized his mindset to purge himself of what he perceived to be weak principles. He had hoped to strengthen his resolve in his pursuit of a life without doubt.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

The First Meditation is a exercises in learning to doubt everything that one believes at three different levels. Descartes notes that nothing is always as they seem at first glance and then notes to never trust in the truth of what we perceive (Perceptual Illusion). Descartes raised a more systematic way to doubt the legitimacy of sensory perception. He claims that anything we perceive in the physical world is nothing more than a fabrication of our imagination (Dream Problem).

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

In the second meditation, Descartes uses this cogito of consciousness and existence to assume that the mind is distant from a body. “I am, I exist”. This essay I will clearly discuss an outline of Descartes cogito in the second meditation and how it deals with the subject of existence and also Descartes’s strongest and weakest arguments in this case. “The Meditation of yesterday filled my mind with so many doubts that it is no longer in my power to

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Descartes Epistemology: Descartes attempts to discover a foundation of knowledge as seen in his book ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’. He is essentially looking for total certainty. In order to do so, Descartes doubted everything, coming to the realization that he can only prove his

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

Descartes Methodological Doubt and Meditations Methodological doubt is an approach in philosophy that employs distrust and doubt to all the truths and beliefs of an individual to determine what beliefs he or she is certain are true. It was popularized by Rene Descartes who made it a characteristic method of philosophy where a philosopher subjects all the knowledge they have with the sole purpose of scrutinizing and differentiating the true claims from the false claims. Methodological doubt establishes certainty by analytically and tentatively doubting all the knowledge that one knows to set aside dubitable knowledge from the indubitable knowledge that an individual possesses. According to Descartes, who was a rationalist, his first meditation

Read More

More about Rene Descartes Myth Of Sisyphus

Related Topics

Open Document