Reno Vs Alcu Essay

1300 Words6 Pages

The Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, consists of the first ten amendments made to the United States Constitution. Its purpose was to list and guarantee the rights of American citizens, and to limit the power of the general, or federal government. The first amendment, among other things, enforces the idea of freedom of speech and press. “The free press is necessary in order to preserve the republican aspect of the government from abuse of power on the part of the monarchy.” There have been many intervals in history when the details of freedom of the press and freedom of speech have been questioned. During these times, the Supreme Court became involved with the affairs. The Supreme Court was established through the Constitution in 1787, along with the district courts and appellate courts. The Supreme Court cases Reno v. ACLU of 1996, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan of 1964, and Abrams v. United States (???), are such occasions.
On June 26, 1997, the Supreme Court ruled the CDA, or the Communications Decency Act, unconstitutional. This occurred through the case Reno v. ALCU. The ALCU was the American Civil Liberties Union, Janet Reno was …show more content…

“’I’m addicted to the Internet, I admit it.’ He wrote. ‘It has transformed the way I work as a senator, communicate with my children, and keep tabs on news and cultural developments.’” He was one of the many Americans that saw the potential in the internet. It can not only help adults in their daily activities, but it can also help educate children and young adults in modern problems that they will face. He, along with many Americans, believed the Communications Decency Act could affect such information and discussions. He proposed a study of the internet by the Justice Department. He wanted the Department to evaluate and search for ways to improve the enforcement of the existing laws, in addition to help parents monitor their children’s internet