ipl-logo

Reputation And Moral Rights In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

1292 Words6 Pages

Reputation vs Moral Rights in The Crucible
Every day, human beings are faced with having to choose between keeping a stellar reputation, or pursuing what is morally right. This is apparent in Arthur Miller’s tragic play, The Crucible, when multiple characters have to make the choice of good reputation, or following good morals when they are dealing with witchcraft and The Salem Witch Trials. Through the use of well thought out characters, Arthur Miller is able to portray that when one’s actions are chosen by the intention of maintaining a perfect public image, instead of doing what is morally right, he/she ends up ruining that reputation in the end.
While reading the play, the very first character that the reader is introduced to is Reverend …show more content…

At the sound of a prayer, Betty awoke, screaming and covering her ears, making it clear to the townspeople in the room that the causes of Betty’s illness had something to do with witchcraft (Miller 21). Once the rest of the town had heard what had happened, accusations began towards people within Salem. Parris is quick to jump to the communities good side in order to maintain his reputation, and helps create the list of people to put on trial (Miller 49). Parris is then surprised when his good friends John and Elizabeth Proctor, who both have such great reputations, are sentenced to be hung. Parris then tries to convince Judge Danforth to postpone the hangings until they have more evidence by saying, “I would to God it were not so, excellency, but these people have great weight yet in the town” (Miller 118). Parris was not able to convince Danforth to postpone the hangings because Danforth was concerned that it would change his own reputation as a strong judge (Miller 119). If Parris had followed his morals earlier in the play instead of trying to maintain his perfect public image, he may have been able to save the lives of multiple innocent townspeople who did not confess due to their moral good. If he had done so, he may have maintained his image as a noble townsman instead of being the one who was incharge of hanging the

Open Document