ipl-logo

Research Paper On John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

456 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: John stuart mill's version of utilitarianism

Mill’s Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism have lots of agreements and applications in society. Jeremy Bentham (1789) was the great man who come out with utilitarianism. He claimed that pain and pressure are two sovereign masters to “point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.”(Bentham, 1907, p.4) Then, a question occurs. What if a person neither do nothing, or produce no pressure and no pain? Is it goodness and happiness for himself or herself? In 1861, John Stuart Mill argued that all desirable things should have “promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain.”(Mill, 1998, Ch.2) And this statement meets the requirement of utilitarianism, which is making the greatest total utility. Promotion of …show more content…

John Rawls’ Theory of Justice does not only guide modern policies and laws, but also mindset of modern people. In Rawls’s theory, he suggests people should making fair decision behind “Veil of Ignorance”(Rawls, 1972, Ch.1). Rawls said, “the original position of equality corresponds to the state of nature in traditional theory of the social contract.”((Rawls, 1972, Ch.1) For example, if there is a prince kill a kind farmer for taking his beautiful wife, will the law pardon this prince because he is a prince? If so, can this issue be justice? In real society, a person may have several hypothetical position. However, the same position of each other, person’s original position, is possibility that can achieve fairness and justice in the complicated society. Thus, majority people prefer using Rawls’ Theory of Justice to search for justice and fairness. Consequentialism meet majority people’s demand of profit. In this information age, news are spread fast and briefly by internet, like fast food. In this situation, people focus on “what happens” only, instead of process. They will figure out whether the issue meet the greatest amount of people’s benefit, and whether the issue is justice or not. Then, they will definite whether this things are right or wrong, causing heated discussions online. In personal opinion, if social news media can report news with more detail and fair description, public will not be mislead and have no online

Show More
Related

Rawls Theory Of Justice In Blade Runner

1521 Words | 7 Pages

People have long considered how to appropriately structure society in order to provide the most justice and equality for all. Governments have been attempting to implement constitutions that provide these justice. However, before an emerging state can provide a just constitution, the theories of justice behind the constitution must be valid. Although Rawls has created a theory of justice that can detect injustice well, the rational falls short of persuasive as it disregards interpersonal comparisons of utilities, alternatives to the maximin strategy, and the end result principle. Before we can understand what Rawls’ theory of justice is, we must first understand the situation in which he imagines the theory of justice being initiated for society -- he calls this the original position.

Read More

John Rawlss: The Most Just Theory Of Justice

1036 Words | 5 Pages

In this essay, it is argued that to achieve a truly fair conception of justice that could be applied to social and economic structure of society is only possible from the initial position of equality that ensures a complete dissociation from any knowledge about personal position in the society. Such a conception of justice leads to a just society that equally distributes the benefits of every member of such a community (Rawls, 1999: 3-19). This essay first elaborates on Rawls’s understanding of justice. The next part addresses why and how the veil of ignorance is crucial for the original position of equality and the importance of difference-principle emerging from this position.

Read More

John Rawls: A Theory Of Justice

4259 Words | 18 Pages

The shape and content of both political and social philosophy has been significantly revolutionized since the emergence of John Rawls’ ideas. His’ A Theory of Justice’, most significantly, has been a rich source of ideas which continue to impact contemporary discussions about society and politics. Rawls 's Theory of Justice is extensively considered as one of this century 's most important pieces of political philosophy. The renowned philosopher’s ideology takes as its starting point the argument that "the most reasonable principles of justice are those everyone would accept and agree to from a fair position". By using a similar alternative to the social contract, in his Theory of Justice, Rawls addresses the problem of distributive justice.

Read More

John Rawls's View Of Social Justice In Society

1290 Words | 6 Pages

The claim that rational individuals behind a veil of ignorance would choose the greatest possible equality has been challenged as arbitrary and unverifiable. Rational individuals might well choose a social structure with large rewards for the majority of people and small rewards for the minority on the grounds that one is more likely to end up as part of a majority than a minority. Moreover, the veil of ignorance of where one will be in a society also takes away all knowledge of what one will do. Legal justice is generally considered a matter of appropriate responses to actions: In the version offered by Rawls, justice is detached from anything that anyone has done and thus may have nothing to do with any idea of what people

Read More

Rawls Principles Of Justice Essay

969 Words | 4 Pages

Principles of Justice Reflective Equilibrium is Rawls’ attempt to argue that persons within society’s judgments are derived from a set of principles, namely principles of justice . These two principles of justice include: 1) Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others 2) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and b) attached to positions in offices open to all. Equal Liberty These principles are in order of importance, in the sense that it is not until the first principle is completely satisfied that the second principle can come into effect. These principles are not only concerned

Read More

Rawls Vs Kant

1253 Words | 6 Pages

According to Rawls, justice is what society agrees is just. Justice is how we relate with others and does not make sense for a single person. Rawl’s social contract theory is based on the justice that people choose together. His main idea of a theory of justice considers what kind of society people would choose if they did not know what place that would be in within this society. Rawls refers to this state as the original position.

Read More

Analysis Of John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

2052 Words | 9 Pages

THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY ANANYA MISHRA 214026 ON THE TOPIC (JURISPRUDENCE) IN THE MONSOON SEMESTER 2016-17 INTRODUCTION: John Rawls developed a conception of justice as fairness in his classic work A Theory of Justice. Using elements of both Kantian and utilitarian philosophy, he has described a method for the moral evaluation of social and political institutions.

Read More

Social Justice Theory

759 Words | 4 Pages

However, their approaches are different thus creating more conflict between theories. Rawls proposes that a veil of ignorance is the ideal way to make proper decisions. The veil of ignorance is, in essence, a group of people would walk into a room with no knowledge of who they were, what their gender or sexuality was, where and how they grew up, what their ethnicity was, or what their beliefs were. They would then be presented with a pressing social issue like what just solution will allow the three men to equally see over the wall. Theoretically, the veil of ignorance would be an effective way to eliminate all personal bias.

Read More

Justice In John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

802 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls believe that the way to set up justice as fairness must go beyond human-being who still can choose their benefit by bias stuffs which effected to them. To find out the principles in society would be chosen by people who do not know their position and do not know how they are going to be impacted by their decision. Rawls’ principle is a principle of distribution and so on when critic or look depth into this, we much concerned more what is the main point that he set up justice as fairness for

Read More

John Rawls Theory Of Civil Disobedience

1348 Words | 6 Pages

Rawls’ first principle of justice outlines that social institutions in a just society must aim for maximum equal liberty (Rawls, p. 82). His second principle, the difference principle, justifies inequality, but only when it maximally benefits those who are worse off (Rawls, pp. 65-66). Rawls ‘acknowledges that these principles are an oversimplification of distributive justice, but believes they should be applied to the basic structures of society (Rawls, p. 77). Rawls acknowledges that there needs to be regulations on when civil disobedience is justifiable.

Read More

Difference Between A Theory Of Justice By John Rawls

2679 Words | 11 Pages

According to John Rawls, his ‘A Theory of Justice’ is an attempt to offer a system of justice, which is a viable substitute to the prevalent practice of choosing a deviation of the principle of utilitarianism which is limited by the intuitionism of people (Rawls, viii). This, Rawls reasons, is because despite the sophistication of the various theories of Utilitarianism presented by philosophers like Bentham and Mill, it failed to work out a “systematic moral conception” leaving a difference between the principles of Utility and the moral sentiments of the people (ibid). The alternative system of justice provided by Rawls is an attempt to address this difference with rationality. The function of rationality here is to produce a theory that can consistently provide an explanation for human behaviour and motivation. This alternative system of justice is described as ‘justice as fairness’.

Read More

Critical Analysis Of John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More

On Liberty John Stuart Mill Analysis

887 Words | 4 Pages

John Stuart Mill, born London 1806 was an influential moral and political philosopher. His philosophy which aims for reform rather than revolution formed the basis of British Victorian Liberalism. Struck by the elegant simplicity principle of “the greatest happiness for the greatest number” Mill quickly became an advocate of how utilitarianism might be applied in the real world. By creating an “indissoluble association” between the individual’s happiness and the good of society, one established a community where all individuals were allowed the freedom to pursue happiness. In Mill’s writing On Liberty chapter two “Of the liberty of thought and discussion” Mill sets out an important argument for freedom of speech in which a state without “the liberty of thought and discussion” was one in which the individual could not pursue happiness.

Read More

John Rawls Concept Of Justice Essay

1118 Words | 5 Pages

Justice explained What is justice? According to Wikipedia.com, justice is defined as a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, religion, equity and fairness. The views of justice differ from person to person. John Rawls was an American philosopher, and a leading figure in moral and political philosophy. His view on justice was similar to Karl Marx’s belief.

Read More

Overlapping Consensus Analysis

1320 Words | 6 Pages

Walzer’s main point of contention with this theory is that all the ideas or principles of justice have to be arrived at from pre-conceived notions of rationality. The social sphere of man greatly contributes towards developing this side of him. Rawls’ stripped-down individual is completely removed from this set-up and hence his decisions will not be relevant in a real social context as his ideas of what is good are formulated as a result of what the society around him creates and holds to be good and it is not the result of individual rationality and

Read More

More about Research Paper On John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document