ipl-logo

Research Paper On Missouri Compromise

575 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Missouri compromise quiz and key

Erin Rall History 113 Professor Townsend 11/14/15
Missouri Statehood: Compromise or Conflict
According to Oxford Dictionaries, compromise is defined as an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions (Oxford University Press).
Although compromise is usually the best solution to resolve a conflict, it does not always work.
Compromise has played a long role in the history of the United States. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise which caused one of America's most famous and heated political conflicts. This essay will discuss the crisis that developed around the admission of Missouri as a state and how this crisis was resolved.
Since the Revolution, the country had grown from 13 states …show more content…

In February 1819, New York Representative James Tallmadge Jr. electrified the proceedings by proposing an amendment to ban the transport of more slaves in
Missouri as a condition of statehood, even though there were more than 2,000 slaves living there.
From here the debate began (Text p. 316). The South felt that the U.S. government had no power to restrict slavery, which was protected under the Constitution. The North felt that slavery was evil and should be restricted to the current slave states. The Southern states dependent upon slave labor, and 200 years of living with the institution had made it an integral part of Southern life and culture (Ch. 10 PowerPoint). In 1819, Maine, which had been part of Massachusetts, put in its application for statehood. Then a compromise developed (Text p. 316).
Erin Rall History 113 Professor Townsend 11/14/15
The Missouri Compromise came as a two part solution to the admission problem. First,
Missouri gained admission to the Union as a slave state, with a provision that portions of

Show More
Related
136 Words | 1 Pages

While the North tried to stop the South from withdrawing their spot in the Union, the North also denied the Southern states rights. Sectional groups assembled in the North regarding the “unnatural feeling and hostility” to slavery in the South. “ By consolidating their strength, they have placed the strength... no avail in protecting Southern rights (Document I). The Northerners believed that slavery is not right, and also that “the demand of African slavery throughout the confederacy” is unheard of.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri compromise, the tariffs, and slavery

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Although in the Missouri Compromise, Missouri became a slave state and Maine became a free state, it was an example of disunity. All new states north of the Mason-Dixon Line would be free and new states southward would be slave states. As a result, there was also an unbalanced sectional population between the North and South. (Doc. E & F).

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

P.6 Compromises seemed to be working in 1820 as a solution to political issues that America agreed to disagreed on. As seen in the Missouri Compromise, where Henry Clay made slaves free in twelve states and not free in the other twelve; in order to keep everything balanced. But between the period of 1820 to 1860, compromising took a shift and no longer seemed to be the solution. Compromises worked with Henry Clay in the Missouri compromise in 1820 but by 1860 due to a series of geographic, political, and social changes compromises were impossible.

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 done what it set out to do, it kept the nation united, but the solution was only for a little while. Over the following decade the country's citizens became further separated over the issue of

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

The admission of Missouri to the Union was met with discontent because many believed it would disrupt the tranquility of having an even number of slave states and free states. The solution was raised to admit the newest northern state of Maine into the union as a free state, maintaining the balance. After this decision was made, they banned slavery in the new territories above the latitude of 36°30’. This solution was referred to as the Missouri Compromise. This may have been seen a victory because of its limitation on the spread of slavery, but the compromise also led to slavery also becoming more deep-seated in the southern way of

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

The vast territories gained with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, opened up a slew of disputed between the North and South over the issue regarding slavery and its expansion west. The possibility of western states becoming slave states created the greatest debate of the nineteenth century. In 1819, there were an equal number of free states and slave states which maintained a delicate balance of representatives in the senate. However, when Missouri applied for statehood into the Union as a slave state it threatened to break the delicate balance and grant political representation in favor of the South. Desperately trying to prevent this balance from breaking, Representative James Tallmadge Jr. of New York, proposed a resolution to ban the transport

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

The U.S was only able to settle political disputes through compromise until 1860 because of the increasing sectionalism, the Abolitionist Movement and the Secession of South Carolina. New states joined into congress creating an unbalanced senate forcing congress to make decisions to balance the nation between freedom and slavery. The Missouri Compromise failed as an attempt to maintain peace between the North and South because it created an greater sense of sectionalism throughout the country. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a decision to make Missouri a slave state to maintain an even number of free and slave states. It led to uproar in congress and the North retaliated by declaring the rest of the Louisiana territory to be free.

Read More
2152 Words | 9 Pages

The Missouri Compromise passed into law in 1821, and many worshipped it as the compromise that permanently solved the problem of expansion of slavery in the West. Others, like Thomas Jefferson, felt that new land “signaled the beginning, not the end of conflict” (Smith 26). John Adams, an aged statesmen from the North, said that the Compromise was “the title page to a great tragic volume” (Smith

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

Slavery in the United States was the main form of labor in the late 1700’s. While being thought of as a normal way of life, many whites took in colored people as slaves for field work, house work, and much more. Their mistreatment and injustices began to raise red flags in the ethics of the society. From 1776 to 1852, opposition to slavery was quickly spreading as many forces caused the prolonged debate of slavery to come into question. The increase in the black population, the facts and rights outlined in the Declaration of Independence, and the harsh mistreatment of slaves were all factors in the continuous growth of the idea of abolition until eventual reconstruction after the Civil War in 1867.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Southern states even threatened to secede because of the differences in opinion on slavery. To prevent this, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state, but in exchange, Maine was admitted as a free state. In addition, all states and lands north of the 36°30’ parallel would be free (except for Missouri). This ‘compromise’ somehow managed to hold America together, but no one was really satisfied.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

Read More

More about Research Paper On Missouri Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document