ipl-logo

Resistance To Civil Government By Henry David Thoreau

665 Words3 Pages

The concept of civil disobedience, as defined by Henry David Thoreau in his essay "Resistance to Civil Government," has become an increasingly controversial topic in modern society. In this essay, Thoreau argues that individuals have a moral obligation to resist laws that are unjust or unreasonable, even if it means breaking the law and facing consequences such as imprisonment. This idea has been embraced by many activists and protestors who claim that people should protest laws that are unfair or unreasonable. However, there is also a counterargument that suggests that protesting laws is not the most effective way to bring about change, and that individuals should instead work within the system to bring about reform. Thoreau's argument for civil disobedience is rooted in the belief that individuals have a higher moral obligation to themselves and their conscience than to the laws of the state. He argues that when a law becomes unjust or unreasonable, it is no longer a valid law and that individuals have a duty to resist it. In this sense, Thoreau believes that civil disobedience is a form of self-defense, as it allows individuals to preserve their own integrity and sense of morality in the face of oppressive laws. …show more content…

He believed that peaceful resistance, such as petitioning the government and speaking out against unjust laws, was often the most effective means of bringing about change. However, when peaceful resistance is not enough, he believed that individuals should take bold and direct action to resist unjust laws, even if it means breaking the law and facing

Open Document