George Orwell’s Essays are valued by audiences due to their ability to effectively communicate and address universal concerns. Born in 1903, Orwell grew up through two World Wars and fought in the Spanish Civil war leading him to develop strong political beliefs and views about events that were occurring during his lifetime. Orwell incorporates these views in his writing by making specific comments against totalitarianism, nationalism and other left wing ideologies in his work. His works The Sporting Spirit and Writers and Leviathan draw upon his discontent with the influence of Nationalistic values in depraving sport and debasing literature into political propaganda. My response to Orwell’s Essays has been an greater appreciation of the ability of language in formulating a persuasive body of …show more content…
In essence, Orwell’s use of highly skillful use of language allows him to make his highly subjective opinions more factual which increases the chance of the reader supporting him. Orwell expands on the same idea of Nationalistic values corrupting society by highlighting the “the invasion of literature by politics”. As a writer living during post WWII, Orwell is conscious of the emergence of different political attitudes and ideals which have heavily influenced writing and subjected them to bias. Orwell insinuates in Writers and Leviathan that in a time of war, writers will write about war by using the analogy “When you are on sinking ships, your thoughts will be on sinking ships”. His use of Logos is highly effective as he has already gained high credibility from his earlier use of Ethos, allowing audiences to perceive his writing as “the truth”. This allows him to express that although “it is inevitable in tumultuous, revolutionary ages like our own” he is dissatisfied with books being judged based on their “political reason” instead of their “literary standards”. By manipulating rhetoric to his own