Discuss Dr. King’s use of restraint in the “Letter”. What does it reveal about his purpose, and what is its effect?
- Throughout his career, many critics have argued that Dr. King has been too deferential to the white authorities that have made segregation and other racial policies. The tone reveals his purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. The restraint also lets him reinforce the connection of men and that all men are responsible for others.
How does the “Letter” deal with the subject of race?
- The letter was written during a situation and time period where there were racial issues. Most of the letter is presented with issues of “justice” and the relatedness of men being equal. He argues that the clergymen should support his cause not only because they are black but because it is the right thing to do.
Why does Dr. King decry Moderation?
- Because moderation is nothing but a handy disguise for
…show more content…
- The clergymen because they had good will.
Discuss Dr. King’s use of allusions throughout the text. How do they strengthen his argument and underscore his overall message?
-
In what ways does the “letter” attack the clergymen even when being outwardly deferential towards them?
- He is always deferential. He is suggests that the clergymen backtrack from their sin of ignorance and error. He attacks them through threats and suggestions. In what ways do Dr. King’s repeated references to Socrates, help to elucidate his overall approach?
-
Detail the distinction between just and unjust laws. Why is it important Dr. King make this distinction?
- One has a legal and moral responsibility to obey “just” laws because they are a “ man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God.” Any “just” law uplifts human personality. One has a moral responsibility to disobey “unjust” laws because they are “ a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.” Any “unjust” law degrades human