Returning To No Country For Old Men Analysis

444 Words2 Pages
Returning to No Country for Old Men and Stagecoach, the differences continue to display themselves, mainly with the problem of fatalism. Fatalism is the idea that a person’s life is already determined by fate. This meaning that all natural freedoms and government allowed freedoms are essentially not existence because all the decisions or events that come through out a person’s life have already been decided. Making any idea of freedom moot. This was displayed in No Country for Old Men when Chigurh flips his coin to decide whether a person will live or die. This including when Chigurh claims the coin and Carla Jean got to that same point in time the same way. Another piece of material that helps us understand freedom is the competing arguments