Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality literature
Gender equality in literature
Gender equality in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality literature
Gender equality in literature
Gender equality in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Civil War, fought mostly by men, is often referred to as the war of brother against brother. Although there were a few women who engaged in the battles alongside the men, the number was very small and their direct contribution to battle was probably not very significant. This is not to say that women were not important to the Civil War. Women were very influential in the national crisis and their contributions were arguably just as important as the male soldier’s on the battlefield. On both sides of the war, women employed their strength, intelligence, and compassion in the critical roles of abolitionists, civil right’s advocates, nurses and spies.
In the feature article “All Guts, No Glory”, I agree with the author Molly M. Ginty, that women participating in combat. If I was in the military some of the things that might affect me would be probably because of my gender. First, women would not be put into battle because people think women cannot handle the work or bloodshed. They think women are better off bring a nurse for helping men in battle if they get injured. Second, they think women in combat would be a distraction.
This meant that women had to step up. This war changed the ideal image of the common American woman. Before the war, women were supposed to be structured as known by Historians as, “The Cult of True Womanhood.” This was the
As said in Women in War Industries Interview with Sybil
Even some women would go so far to gather money to put clothes on the soldier’s back or sew their clothes. Others would travel with the men, whether it is camp followers, who were women who washed, cooked, nursed, sew, gather supplies, and even in some cases be sex partners or spies. Women dressed up as men and changed their name to fight as a soldier, or General’s wives who just wanted to be with their husbands like Martha Washington or Caty Greene. Not only do we see the point of the war through the women’s eyes that resisted British rule, but also from the eyes of Frederika von Residesel whose husband, Fritz Residesel, who fought for Britain. Indian women also felt the effects of the war, because they thought that “if America won their social roles would be changed and their power within their communities diminished” (Berkin.107).
She describes the front as, “a city of the dead” (79). This statement is key because it shows the importance of how this war has affected the whole community. Women sacrificed their service in the war, while leaving behind their own family. She explains that as a nurse, she has to care for other mother’s sons, while she also has her own kids at home to feed. Even though all women may not have been war combatants, many still experienced the devastation and trauma of the war.
Tim O’Brien’s novel The Things They Carried focuses on the US war in Vietnam. In this novel the author provides numerous details about the war and tries to riseraise as many important themes based on situations. as possible. which are important according to the situation. O’Brien was a participant in the war himself.
During World War I, many women started to protest in groups and form political organisations against the concepts behind war, as women believed war to be “[...] Another version of the strong oppressing the weak, and thus an empathic for of patriarchy” (Gilchrist, 2014). An example of these anti-war organisations was the ‘Women Peace Society’, founded by women for women, which lasted from 1915 to 1919. They openly campaigned on the streets and in newspapers against the conscription movement in Australia (Gilchrist, 2014). This shows that the women on the home front were determined to express their opinion and make sure it was taken seriously in consideration.
Not only was Jane Addams a leader in the American Progressivism Movement, but she contributed in many other aspects of American history. Her most notable contribution is Hull House, one of the first settlements in America, she created in the West Side of Chicago in 1889. Jane Addams’ motivation for creating the Hull House was not only what I think she felt as her moral and religious obligation to provide some type of relief to those suffering around her, but everyone else’s lack of action and her need to find some type of meaning in her life. After her father’s death and her traveling through Europe for six years Jane began experiencing self-doubt and depression which caused her to notice a lack of meaning in the “comfortable life of a privileged woman” (Lane).
Yet, women were expected to set aside their personal beliefs to insure that America could still make further advancements without its men. However, women still complied because they knew the responsibility laid with them to keep the nation running. Still, much of propaganda had a purpose to motivate women to lend a helping hand in the war. As Susan Mathis said, “The patriotic appeal had two aspects… ‘do your part’... ‘a soldier may die if you don’t do your part’...”
Women’s involvement in the war did not end in affecting the war itself, but also in paving the way for future gender equality movements meaning that Summit women’s involvement in the war was not strictly limited to aiding in food preservation but in aiding in the fight for equal gender rights for women
Women also faced, “severe shortages of food, clothing, and other goods, while inflation raised the price of everything they had to buy. Spare parts for farm equipment were hard to find,” (Senker). That never stopped these strong females. Without them, the community life during the war would have been in ruins. The whole town would have suffered if females didn’t step up when their male partners left for war.
Women and girls were given more importance in society because of their involvement in the war effort and so were continually given more importance outside of the home. But this also proved difficult in some aspects of a woman’s life, such
Jacoway, Peggy. “Womanhood in War”. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, Vol. 1, No.4, December 1942 For my second article review, I chose to read Peggy Jacoway’s article, titled, “Womanhood in War” At the time of this article, Ms. Jacoway lived in Kansas City, Missouri.
Western feminism has faced several issues over the years in its ideals, where many people challenged this notion on whether it truly assists all women from different regions of the world. Chandra Talpade Mohanty’s book Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity critiques Western feminism and promotes the ideas of feminism through a global context. Mohanty illustrates the importance of “feminism without borders,” signifying the necessity of feminism recognizing the realities of the issues faced by women of all backgrounds from all over the world.