ipl-logo

Reynolds V United States Case Study

516 Words3 Pages

Case Name: Reynolds v. United States

Essential Facts:
• District Court of Utah is charging George Reynolds with bigamy.
• George is the member of the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day saints, which is commonly known as the Mormon Church.
• George received permission from the church to practice polygamy. However, if he does not follow the churches’ rules, then he would receive eternal punishment in hell.
• In the constitution the word religion has not been defined. Therefore, there can be multiple different religious beliefs in the U.S
• The government cannot interfere with all religious beliefs and viewpoints. Yet, they have some authority to interfere with certain practices that does not abide the law.

Legal Issue: Can a person who …show more content…

• Every person has the right to have their own religious belief.
• There should be a separation between the church and state.

The Application of the Law to the Facts:
• The word religion is not defined in the constitution. Therefore, people are allowed to have many beliefs.
• In this case, Mr. Reynolds was following the rules of his religion because he was believing that it was a way to please his god.
• Mr. Reynold has the right to have his own belief, but once he committed the act of bigamy he broke the law.
• In 1786 Jefferson wrote a bill for the Establishment of Religious Freedom, which basically says that there should be a separation of church and state.
• The U.S government says that giving certain rights to a specific religion is wrong.
• The laws of the land must apply to everyone because it can allow peace and have exclusive control of the territories.

Religious Studies and Public Policy Questions: 1) Why does the U.S government decide not to define the word religion in the constitution? 2) How come some religious followers still continue to break certain laws? Shouldn’t they be educated about the laws of the land they live

Show More
Related
728 Words | 3 Pages

Tax Commission. In this case, the court noted that in the absence of a stated constitutional prohibition, it is essential to refer to three evils that the establishment clause was intended to protect. These evils are financial support, sponsorship and the active involvement of a sovereign in religious activities. The appellant in this case sought to prevent the tax commission from granting property tax exemptions to religious organisations for properties used exclusively for worship. The court held that tax exemptions are not aimed at sponsoring, establishing or supporting religion because they create a minimal and remote involvement between the state and the

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Meaning that while laws cannot interfere with religious belief and opinions, laws can be made to regulate some religious practices. For example, Human sacrifices are a part of some religious rituals, but they cannot be tolerated in the United States.  Chief Justice Waite stated that "If we do not make the Constitution the Supreme Law, and allow each person to make up their mind about what law to obey on religious grounds, we would put religious belief over the Constitution." Meaning this would undermine order and the government would only exist in

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

That this unalienable right (religion) is formed by personal opinions and evidence created in an individuals’ mind. He continues on with saying how religion is an obligation given to every man to respectfully pay homage to his creator, and man cannot be a member of civil society without it, but if the General Authority imposes his religious beliefs in civil society he shall live in a state of reservation. Additionally, Madison recognizes that even if this Bill were the want of the majority, that it would crush the want of the minority. He also strongly believed in the legislative’s body removal from all religious mandates, claiming that to have a free government you must preserve the separation of power and each branch must never cross the line which over step’s the individual rights of the people and that previous rulers that have

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

“Liberty which is essential to its existence, the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” One of the many issues is the ability that religion

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

Document D shows a statute from Virginia protecting an individual’s right to practice or to not practice religion: it says that an individual cannot coerce others or be coerced into practicing a religion. Document H shows an ordinance banning slavery in the Northwest Territory of 1787. An individual has the right to his own thought, being it's not a violation of anybody else's rights when he thinks. This individual right is protected by the Virginia statute, and that this right is specifically mentioned and defended by the government is proof that the government admits to their responsibility to protect it. The ban on slavery on the Northwest Territory north of the Ohio River, as noted in Document H, is yet more proof that the government is assuming the role of the guardian to individual rights.

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

Secular governing, also known as the separation of church and state, has not been around for a long period of time. Since before the United States was founded, there have been many radical changes in the general consensus on whether or not a government should encourage or even force a religion on its people. With Puritanism, Deism, and Transcendentalism, it is easy to see a change in attitudes as the years went by. The canonical literature created by some of the celebrated writers in the United States shows a progression over time in regards to different beliefs and their views on secular governments.

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

This is a negative right, since it prohibits something rather than entitles it. Under this clause, the U.S. government is prohibited from establishing one religion above others. This is usually interpreted to mean that the Founding Fathers were trying to avoid the imposition of a 'state religion. ' Just like the Free Exercise Clause, though, there are times when it seems that religion and government can 't get out of each other 's way. Fortunately, the Constitution includes a process for resolving these questions: the U.S.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

How would you feel if you were not allowed to believe in your faith because of the constitution? The article, "Some Lawmakers Are Making The Separation Of Church And State Seem Like A Total Joke", written by Julia Craven (staff reporter) and edited by Nick Wing (senior viral editor) at the Huffington Post. Craven graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in International Politics and Wing graduated with a Bachelor of Art in Political Science and Journalism. This allows them to provide accurate and informational explanations about this article 's topic. In the article, they explain how lawmakers and citizens are debating the importance of separation of church and state.

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

The changes made in the Protestant Reformation greatly affect our life today. Without the Reformation, religion would play a very different role in the lives of the average person. The lasting effects of the Reformation play a key role in our lives. Religion used to be the basis of a person’s life.

Read More
1049 Words | 5 Pages

In today 's society, religious freedom is the freedom of the individual or community to practice any religion they believe in. It was often misunderstood that American colonist were in search of religious liberty, but in reality groups such as the Puritans and Pilgrims who left Europe to escape religious persecution sought the liberty to practice their own faith and often were intolerant of religious diversity. During this time, religion and the government went hand and hand. These leaders of the church were also leaders in the government and would enforce strict religious observance. In the beginning of Colonial America, religion and the government were inseparable and often leaders like John Winthrop would persecute dissenters who didn 't

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Overview of the principle In the United States, separation of church and state is sometimes believed to be in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and by legal precedents interpreting that clause, some being extremely controversial. The Establishment Clause states that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" However, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Fourteenth Amendment (one of the Reconstruction Amendments) makes the Establishment Clause and other portions of the Bill of Rights binding on state and local governments as well, although it is arguable that this restriction on state and local government existed in Article VI of

Read More
1424 Words | 6 Pages

This suggests that the separation of church and state is in place so that the government can't influence or be influenced by religion. It is then necessary to then discuss what the separation of the two effects. The United States constitution

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

There are many views and opinions of the state of the United States on this subject. It has long been a puzzling issue that never seems to seize. America should have religious freedom, because it is a constitutional right to Americans. Prayer in school, gay marriage, and governmental control, are among some of the main issues in this topic.

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

People should have the right to defend themselves judicially and should obviously have the right to religious

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

“Religious liberty might be supposed to mean that everybody is free to discuss religion. In practice, it means that hardly anybody is allowed to mention it.” ― G.K. Chesterton Many occasions in the United States history have shown that religion has caused many controversial questions. These questions have brought the American Justice System to a running halt, leading society to begin to ponder about the importance of freedom of religion, true meanings of the free exercise and establishment clause, and if there should be limitations imposed on the free exercise of one’s religious beliefs.

Read More

More about Reynolds V United States Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document