In his article, “Gun Control Kills,” Jack Hunter tackles the controversial topic of gun control. Hunter makes the point that gun control is in fact bad for the United States and that banning guns would actually lead to more deaths per year, the opposite of the goal for those that support gun control. Hunter does this using a number of argumentative techniques in order to convince his readers that gun control is wrong. Many of the techniques that Hunter uses are effective in attempting to make people believe in his cause, however some of the points that he makes are also ineffective and somewhat discredit his point. There are times in the article in which Hunter shows his own bias towards the subject, and tries to service the article towards …show more content…
By starting his article with “Is there an evil worse than killing children?” he effectively grabs the attention of whomever is reading the article by using an extreme scenario as the first sentence. Throughout the article Hunter mentions multiple cases of gun crimes where a passerby happened to have a concealed gun on them and was able to stop the violence. These examples show situations where a legally owned gun was able to stop crime; exactly what Hunter is trying to prove. Hunter later on in the article mentions a quote from an article about the death penalty. This is an effective argument technique as it re-peaks the readers interest in what they’re reading due to the death penalty also being such a widely controversial topic. Hunter also provides examples spanning from 1997 to 2012 to prove his point. Hunter closes the article by stating that more people will die from harsher gun controls. While this isn’t necessarily proven, closing with this statement helps secure the people who were on the fence about their opinion. These techniques almost certainly swayed at least a few people in the direction that Hunter wants them to go due to their