In the last 30 years, the revolution of technological innovation storms our planet earth covering us as a blanket. Since, after the birth of internet it changes the world influences on people day to day life by creating negative effects upon user’s concentration. The future of the intelligent life tied up of human being with cybers community. In the 1990s, the emerging of internet to the public, finally it brought the Google into existence. Writer Nicholas Carr, in 2008 in his article entitled “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr poses the question about the Internet and gives for readers some thought by revealing the hidden truth about the Internet. Carr strongly believes that in adverse ways how the Internet shapes our way of thinking and processing of information. How Carr creates a very persuasive point even if his views may be considered a minority opinion? One of the most vital tool that Carr utilizes is the rhetorical tactic of Prolepsis. In his article, as I have analyzed, the …show more content…
Disagreement has its own features, but most people prefer to live among like-minded because agreeing is usually easier than confronting someone. Undeniably, disagreement is uncomfortable, but it is the source of true innovation, for a critical process in identifying and justifying risks. Even though a fixed amount of value gained in a disagreement, but it has a limit for toleration. ‘The Dying Art of Disagreement’ was the title of a lecture delivered by Bret Stevens at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, Australia, on Saturday, 23 September 2017. Thus, “The Dying Art of Disagreement” has a vital ingredient for a decent society whom openly and respectfully disagreed in fully or partially by analyzing things from the other person’s perspective. Stephens tells inquirer there is one critical precondition to disagreement. What relevant facts do we agree upon? and how significant is our