Rhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Reagan's Address On Religious Liberty

When publically speaking, a person must have a certain tone. You must address the matter if it’s serious or persuasive into establishing a law or a proclamation. Ronald Reagan uses a specific tone when addressing his people. Ronald Reagan’s National Affairs campaign Address on Religious Liberty”, speech demonstrates how he clearly accept different religion. In the speech it states,” We’re told that any public policy approach incorporating traditional values is out og bonds”, this shows that many people are against religious freedom. They are against the different religion that imposes their values on people actually wanted to follow. There is two different points of view in which are pro- with religious freedom/liberty and dispute-which is

Religious liberty should be able for everyone and every religion should be able to impose their values on people who want to listen. No one should be able to control a delicate subject such as religion. Many people are with religious liberty such as Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan gave a speech on Religious Liberty in which he stated, “when you stand up for your values, when you assert your civil rights to vote and to participate fully in government, your defending our true heritage of religious liberty”, which shows how he encourages his people to stand up and assert your civil right on religious freedom. Ronald Reagan’s view on religious liberty is that it should be liberated for every religion to impose their beliefs and values on people who are willing to listen to them and that people have to stand up and fight for religious liberty because if not who will. His point of view is pro-with religious liberty and uses the element anaphora because he says,” if you don’t not speak your mind and cast your ballots, then who will speak and work for the ideas we cherish”? Ronald Reagan makes it seem like if we don’t speak or vote then who will give us a voice and work for our

There are never going on the same page and will always go head to head even for the simplest things. Religion itself is a delicate and fragile topic that one wrong world could make it all go tumbling down. Now bring different religions and their freedom and values on other people it’s like a hurricane blowing through a town leaving everything in disaster. Since many people go against religious liberty one can say that the former president Ronald Reagan was wrong and never had the simplest idea about religion. While other could say that he hit it on the mark with religious liberty and how everyone should independent with their values, views on religion, and beliefs. We can never be one sided there are always going to be people who questions or doesn’t understand the delicateness of religious liberty. It’s up to us to a pick a side in which he can relate or feel is right and determine what happens in the far off future of religious