ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference

848 Words4 Pages

Elie wiesel once said, “ A strange and unnatural state in which the lines blur between light and darkness”. Elie Wiesel is a holocaust survivor. He gave a wonderful speech called “ The perils of indifference”. He delivered this speech at the white house in washington D.C hoping to encourage the audience to learn from the past. Elie wiesel builds an argument to persuade the people of the new generation that we can all learn and grow to be better in the new millennium. In “the perils of indifference” Elie Wiesel gives a message of hope while condemning the past, and persuading the audience by using the emotional language, etho, rhetorical questioning, and compare and contrast to incite change.

Elie starts his speech by bring the audience attention …show more content…

He also inform the audience about the indifference that happened during the holocaust .Elie wiesel uses another rhetorical questioning to start off his second main idea and to bring the audience attention to what he is about to point out. In his speech he said, “ what is indifference?” To make the listener ask themselves do they really know what the meaning of indifference is referring to the event. He also use the technique of comparing and contrasting by stating “more dangerous than anger and hatred”. Elie thinks that indifference is worse than anger and hatred. People that knew about this disturbing event did nothing to help, instead they ignore the fact that many innocent people were being killed. He wants the audience to understand how awful indifference is. This shows how effective his argument is. To extend his main idea about indifference, he use etho to express how indifference is a sin and also a punishment by saying “indifference, then is not only a sin, it is a punishment”. Elie expresses this to let the audience know it was very wrong to ignore the truth and not do anything about it knowing that it was wrong. Being an indifference is a lot worst than the person that is doing the killing of innocent. It was wrong to sit back and not do anything and let the situation get worst because a person thinks they can’t make a significant

Show More
Related
455 Words | 2 Pages

Firstly, in “The Perils of Indifference”, Elie Wiesel uses rhetorical questions to get us thinking on the thought of what life would be like for people after the Holocaust. “Does it mean that we have learned from the past?” “Has the human being become less indifferent and more human?” “Have we really learned from our experiences?”

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

Author, Elie Wiesel in his powerful speech, The Perils of Indifference claims history must not repeat. Wiesel develops his message by emphasizing how many were dehumanized. “They no longer felt pain, hunger or thirst. They feared nothing. They felt nothing.

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

Famous author and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel claims in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” that indifference is dangerous. He supports his claim by first defining indifference as “a blurred line between light and dark,” then by illustrating how indifference can benefit the aggressor and be a friend to the enemy. Finally, Wiesel’s imagery and diction helps support his claim. For example, by listing all of humanity’s failures he helps us imagine how dangerous indifference can really be. Wiesel’s purpose is to illustrate all of the dangers of indifference by using personal and historical experiences in order to prevent the same failures from happening again.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

According to Elie Wiesel, our sorrow and suffering are little in compared to the apathy with which we have not responded. The fact that we choose to ignore other people's pain shows that the problem of indifference will never be overcome. As a child, Wiesel observed horrific injustices that inspired him to not only teach people about indifference, but also to show them the risks of indifference's anguish and despair. “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred.(Wiesel)”This comment also helps him comprehend apathy since he utilizes words like "hate" to make his audience feel wounded in some way because no one appreciates being a target. Wiesel used rhetorical questions and references to make his point relatable to every individual in his audience, making his address clear, dependable, and, most importantly, pleasant by putting the audience in his shoes and the shoes of those who have suffered as a result of apathy.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

Holocaust survivor and author, Elie Wiesel in his thought-provoking speech, The Perils of Indifference, maintains the idea that indifference is dangerous and inhuman. He develops his message through the use of imagery, rhetorical questions, and anecdotes. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn readers of the danger that comes with indifference in order to instill a sense of urgency in the readers so that they can avoid indifference. He establishes a serious yet hopeful tone for readers by using stylistic devices such as imagery, metaphor, and rhetorical questions in order to develop his message that indifference is the most dangerous and inhuman thing known to man.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

All through Elie Wiesel’s memoir, he sends a message to his audience about his concern with the amount of indifference being practiced throughout the world. Indifference is enticing, it seems easier to stay out of the way and not contribute, but, if one is aware of the horrific events occurring to their fellow human beings, then one should speak out and show support. In other words, if one stays silent when they know that others are casualties of genocide, persecution, oppression, they are not only indifferent, yet, accomplices to the ones administering the torment. In addition,the individuals who are silent, deny humanity to their fellow human beings and essentially violate, and disregard their human rights. For instance, Wiesel expresses

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

“The Perils of Indifference” is a speech written and given by Elie Wiesel in April 1999. It’s a relatively brief speech that illustrates the after effects of being a prisoner of the Holocaust. Wiesel was there. He lived through it. The feelings that he shares in this speech are not only valid, but rather eye opening as well.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

More specifically, Elie Wiesel is suggesting that indifference is very tempting and ignorant. He writes, “Of course, Indifference can be tempting--more than that, seductive.” In this article, Elie Wiesel belief is that indifference is hazardous because we are tempted to be like everyone else and just as ignorant. In conclusion, Elie Wiesel’s belief is that we don't want to notice and see further into the world that we live in and what others live through. Elie Wiesel is right because we are ignorant and we lack in the feelings of others and the importance for what others are living through.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

The general statement made by Elie Wiesel in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, is that indifference is sinful. More specifically, Wiesel argues that awareness needs to be brought that indifference is dangerous. He writes “Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end”. In this speech, Wiesel is suggesting that indifference is dangerous it can bring the end to many lives. In conclusion Wiesel's belief is suggesting that indifference is an end, it needs to be noticed and taken care of.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Read More
106 Words | 1 Pages

To conclude, Elie Wiesel’s purpose is still relevant to present times and has been an enlightenment for many who felt moved by his speech. His skill of using his personal experience to build a new revolution of an empathetic human race helped his audience obtain a new perspective on the indifferences the human race has enacted. Today, society can see more and more of the injustices of the past, and although some people do take action in minimizing indifferent actions, there is still many occasions where society has failed to go accordingly with solutions like the one Elie Wiesel so passionately delivered an entire speech to.

Read More
855 Words | 4 Pages

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Not only was it disappointing to see the Germans burn children and people, but that nobody does anything to help. “World to keep Silent?” underscores his pain farther. Not only are the Germans doing atrocious acts, but humankind itself lets it happen. Nobody addresses, or handles the situation. Elie does not see the reason for people to keep quiet and not speak up.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference

Related Topics

Open Document